Report-URI offers robust DMARC reporting, helping us gain visibility into our email ecosystem. It excels at parsing DMARC aggregate (RUA) and forensic (RUF) reports, presenting the data in clear, actionable dashboards. We can easily identify legitimate sending sources, detect unauthorized senders, and monitor authentication results for SPF and DKIM.
Beyond core DMARC, Report-URI also supports the monitoring of other email security standards like MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and even BIMI. This broader scope allows us to consolidate our email security posture monitoring into a single platform, ensuring comprehensive visibility across various protocols. It's a focused tool that does its primary job exceptionally well.
Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense (EFD) is a more comprehensive email security suite that includes DMARC reporting as a critical component. It provides extensive capabilities for DMARC deployment, leveraging dedicated consultants and guided workflows. We found its ability to identify legitimate senders and provide authentication support crucial for large-scale implementations.
EFD goes further by offering hosted authentication services for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, which can be invaluable for organizations with complex DNS needs or those hitting SPF lookup limits. Its integration with other Proofpoint products, like their secure email gateway, allows for a unified approach to email security, extending beyond just DMARC enforcement to include broader threat protection and domain discovery for lookalike spoofing.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
When we first started using Report-URI, we immediately appreciated its straightforward interface. The dashboards are intuitive, making it easy to navigate and understand DMARC data at a glance. Setting up DMARC records and getting the reports flowing was a smooth process, largely thanks to their clear documentation and user-friendly wizard.
The focus on DMARC means the UI isn't cluttered with extraneous features. This simplicity is a major advantage for teams primarily concerned with DMARC compliance and monitoring. While it might lack some of the advanced enterprise-grade controls, its ease of use for its core function is commendable, allowing us to quickly interpret data and make decisions.
Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense, as part of a larger security ecosystem, presents a more complex user experience. While powerful, we found that configuring and managing its various components can require a steeper learning curve. The interface, though functional, can sometimes feel less intuitive, especially for users not already familiar with other Proofpoint offerings.
The strength of Proofpoint lies in its depth and breadth, which inherently adds complexity. Features like hosted authentication services and integration with a secure email gateway provide immense value, but navigating these advanced settings and customizing policies often required more time and expertise. This is typical for comprehensive enterprise solutions, but something to be aware of.
Which product has the best support
Support
Report-URI offers solid support primarily through documentation, community forums, and email. We found their online resources to be quite extensive and helpful for self-service problem-solving. For specific issues, their email support was responsive, providing clear guidance on DMARC configuration and data interpretation.
Given its pricing model and target audience, Report-URI's support structure is efficient and effective for its scope. It might not offer the same level of dedicated account management found in enterprise solutions, but for a focused DMARC reporting tool, their support met our needs without major hitches.
Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense provides enterprise-grade support, often including dedicated consultants for DMARC deployment and ongoing management. This level of personalized assistance is a significant advantage for large organizations navigating complex email environments. We found their team knowledgeable, especially when dealing with intricate integrations and policy enforcement.
While the support is comprehensive, some G2 reviews mention that scheduling time with their busy team can occasionally be a challenge. However, once engaged, the expertise available is top-tier, aligning with the needs of large enterprises requiring hands-on guidance for critical security infrastructure. This high-touch model is a hallmark of Proofpoint's service.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Report-URI is an excellent fit for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and individual developers who need a cost-effective and straightforward DMARC monitoring solution. Its generous free tier makes it accessible for those just starting their DMARC journey. Managed Service Providers (MSPs) could also leverage Report-URI for managing DMARC for multiple clients, benefiting from its multi-tenancy capabilities and clear reporting.
For enterprise clients, Report-URI might serve as a foundational reporting tool, but it typically requires integration with other security solutions to meet the broader, more complex needs of large organizations. Its focused nature means it excels at DMARC reporting without the overhead of a full email security suite.
Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense is primarily designed for enterprise-level organizations with complex email infrastructures and a high need for integrated, comprehensive email security. Its professional services for DMARC deployment and hosted authentication services are particularly beneficial for large companies facing strict compliance requirements and significant spoofing threats.
While robust, Proofpoint EFD might be overkill for SMBs due to its extensive feature set and associated cost. MSPs could implement Proofpoint EFD for their enterprise clients, given its multi-tenancy and advanced management features, but it typically requires a substantial investment and technical expertise to deploy and maintain effectively.
How does Report-URI compare with Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
DMARC report analysis
Parses and presents DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Source detection
Identifies legitimate and unauthorized sending IP addresses.
Identifies unauthenticated emails attempting to spoof domains.
Notifications and alerts
Provides alerts for DMARC compliance changes or failures.
Reporting
Offers various reports and dashboards for DMARC data.
API
Provides an API for programmatic access to data and management.
Multi-tenancy
Allows managing DMARC for multiple domains or clients.
SPF flattening
Reduces SPF DNS lookup count to avoid exceeding limits.
Not a direct feature, focuses on reporting.
Offered as part of Hosted SPF service.
Hosted DMARC
Provides a service to host and manage DMARC records.
Primarily a reporting tool.
Offered as a hosted authentication service.
BIMI
Supports monitoring and reporting for BIMI.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Monitors and reports on MTA-STS and TLS-RPT policies.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors IP blacklists (or blocklists) and domain reputation.
Not a primary focus of the product.
Integrated as part of broader email security.
AI copilot
Assisted analysis or actions using artificial intelligence.
DNS monitoring
Monitors DNS records for changes or misconfigurations.
For relevant DMARC, SPF, DKIM records.
Includes comprehensive domain discovery and monitoring.
Self hostable
Option to host the software on your own infrastructure.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free version or trial period.
Offers a generous free plan.
Requires direct contact for pricing and access.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Both Report-URI and Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense are powerful tools, but they cater to different needs. Report-URI's primary drawback is its singular focus, meaning organizations requiring a broader email security suite will need to integrate it with other tools. For Proofpoint EFD, the main concerns often revolve around its complexity, potential for over-filtering legitimate emails, and the high-touch enterprise sales model which may not suit all budgets or immediate needs.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
5 / 5(1)
4.3 / 5(12)
Monitoring for PROs
5.0 / 5
What do you like best about Report URI?
What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great.
What do you dislike about Report URI?
Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks
Recommendations to others considering Report URI:
Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system
What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Overkill
2.0 / 5
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
Great filters for junk and spam. Easy widgets in email notifications to release legit email that is not spam
What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
Too much filtering. At times, overkill. Filters out legitimate emails.
What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you?
Protect network from illicit email spoofing. Employees that are non tech savvy that click on fishing emails.
Verified User in Food & Beverages
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Not sure if it's worth the hassle
2.5 / 5
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
I do like that it auto scans my emails and sorts out the scam/fraudulent ones.
What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
I greatly dislike having to wait for the flagged emails, that are actually not fraudulent, but something that I am looking for. It does not send me the alert until the next day, and then once its been released and approved, it ends up taking another 10 minutes or so (Max) to get to me.
What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you?
I am getting significantly fewer fraudulent/scam emails
Verified User in Construction
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Email Protection by Proofpoint Fraud Defence
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
This product provides email protection for both Inbound and outbound emails from all the domains which help in securing the mailboxes. This adds the advantage of the analytics features alike continuously shows the volume of mails as phishing /secures messages.
What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
Like other proofpoint products this also has implementing and configuring problems as they are not easy to configure in the organization environment.
Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense:
This product offers you great security over emails and customers can leverage the support and different product portfolio they offer.
What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you?
We are securing our emails from phising mails /messages for all the domains and for both inbound outbound messages.
Anjali V.
Cyber Security Analyst Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Reliable tool for spam emails!
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
It's a great reliable tool and keep your inbox more secure and spam free. As a security measure this is great tool which prevents from any fraudulent emails and send alerts as necessary. I am currently using at my company and find all the spam emails being avoided. We usually receives too many on our generic email alias and this help in securing.
What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
It's a great tool, though I find the use of it a very little. Only being capable of avoiding spam emails. Also the dashboard is not much interactive
Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense:
It was always better to have precaution than being penalized by unwanted threat. It's always good to be more secure and spam free and take preventive steps towards running your business securely.
What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you?
We consider our emails to be safe and spam free. And probably easy to set up
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
We use it as our Email Proxy.
4.5 / 5
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
Ability to filter by most likely spam emails. We also have the ability to open up domains.
What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
The UI can be a bit more intuitive if it was up to me.
Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense:
I would recommend for the ease of use and security features offered.
What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you?
Fraud emails and Spam emails for our Enterprise account.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Pricing
Report-URI offers a free tier for basic DMARC reporting, with paid plans scaling based on email volume. Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense is an enterprise solution that requires direct contact for all pricing tiers, reflecting its comprehensive features and professional services.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Free tier available
Contact for pricing
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with Report-URI or Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
5 / 5(1)
