Report-URI offers a robust suite of features extending beyond DMARC, including reporting for CSP (Content Security Policy), SRI (Subresource Integrity), and Expect-CT. This makes it a comprehensive tool for web security reporting, not just email.
For DMARC, it provides detailed aggregate reports, allowing us to see authentication results for SPF and DKIM. Its focus on raw data presentation means users need a good understanding of DMARC to interpret the findings effectively.
KDmarc focuses primarily on DMARC reporting and enforcement. We found its feature set to be more streamlined, concentrating on making DMARC data accessible and actionable for domain owners.
It processes DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, offering insights into email authentication status. While it lacks the broader web security reporting capabilities of Report-URI, it provides a dedicated and clear overview of DMARC performance.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Report-URI's user interface is functional and provides a lot of raw data, which can be overwhelming for those new to DMARC or web security. The dashboard prioritizes information density, which is great for experts but can feel less intuitive for beginners.
Setting up new reports and configuring various policies requires a certain level of technical proficiency. We found that navigating the detailed reports and filtering through data required a learning curve to extract meaningful insights efficiently.
KDmarc generally offers a more user-friendly experience, especially for those who primarily need DMARC insights. The interface is cleaner, with a focus on simplifying complex DMARC data into digestible visualizations and reports.
Onboarding and initial setup are straightforward, with guided steps to configure DMARC records and start receiving reports. Its dashboard is designed to provide quick overviews of DMARC compliance and potential issues, which we found beneficial for daily monitoring.
Which product has the best support
Support
Report-URI provides support primarily through documentation and a community forum. For direct technical assistance, options are available but may be limited depending on the subscription tier. We generally relied on their comprehensive guides for troubleshooting.
Their support model aligns with a more self-service approach, catering to users who are comfortable finding answers independently or have a strong technical background. For specific, complex issues, direct intervention might require patience.
KDmarc offers customer support through various channels, including email and potentially chat, depending on the plan. Their support aims to assist users with DMARC setup, interpretation of reports, and general platform usage.
From our experience, KDmarc's support is generally responsive and helpful for DMARC-specific inquiries, guiding users through the process of achieving enforcement. They focus on practical advice to improve deliverability based on report data.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Report-URI is highly suitable for larger enterprises and technically proficient individuals or teams who need a broad web security reporting tool. Its extensive feature set, including CSP and SRI, makes it valuable for organizations with complex security postures. For MSPs, it could be a powerful tool if they manage comprehensive web security for clients.
SMBs might find Report-URI to be overkill if their primary need is solely DMARC enforcement, as the interface and feature breadth require a steeper learning curve and a dedicated resource to manage effectively. It's best for those who prioritize granular control and advanced data analysis across multiple security protocols.
KDmarc is an excellent choice for SMBs and organizations whose main objective is to implement and enforce DMARC efficiently. Its simplified interface and DMARC-focused features make it accessible even for those with limited technical expertise. MSPs could find it useful for quickly onboarding clients to DMARC.
While enterprise-level organizations can certainly use KDmarc for DMARC, they might seek more comprehensive solutions for broader email and web security needs. It's designed for straightforward DMARC management, offering clear insights without the added complexity of other security protocols.
How does Report-URI compare with KDmarc?
DMARC report analysis
Analysis of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Source detection
Identifies sending sources based on DMARC data.
Forward detection
Helps distinguish legitimate forwards from spoofing attempts.
Requires careful interpretation of raw data.
More intuitive visualization for forwards.
Spoof detection
Identifies unauthorized use of your domain.
Notifications and alerts
Automated alerts for DMARC failures or policy changes.
Configurable, but setup can be complex.
More straightforward alert setup.
Reporting
Provides various types of reports and dashboards.
Extensive raw data and technical reports.
User-friendly, DMARC-specific reports.
API
Provides an API for programmatic access to data.
Multi-tenancy
Manages multiple domains or client accounts from one dashboard.
Suitable for agencies and large organizations.
Supports managing multiple domains.
SPF flattening
Helps manage SPF record limits.
Hosted DMARC
Manages DMARC records for you.
BIMI
Supports Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Helps monitor BIMI DNS record status.
Guidance and monitoring for BIMI.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security and TLS Reporting.
Comprehensive reporting for these protocols.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors domain/IP reputation on email blocklists (or blacklists).
AI copilot
Utilizes AI for insights and recommendations.
DNS monitoring
Monitors DNS records for changes and health.
Broader DNS security monitoring.
Self hostable
Option to host the software on your own infrastructure.
Free trial/free tier
Offers a free trial or a permanently free tier.
Limited free tier available.
Free trial available.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Report-URI's primary drawback is its complexity for non-technical users, coupled with a focus on raw data that necessitates a deep understanding of email and web security protocols. While powerful, this can be a hurdle for faster DMARC implementation. KDmarc, on the other hand, is generally well-regarded for its DMARC-centric approach, but its more limited feature set compared to broader security platforms might be a drawback for those seeking an all-encompassing solution.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
5 / 5(1)
0 / 5(0)
Monitoring for PROs
5.0 / 5
What do you like best about Report URI?
What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great.
What do you dislike about Report URI?
Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks
Recommendations to others considering Report URI:
Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system
What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Pricing
Both Report-URI and KDmarc offer subscription models, but without publicly available pricing details for either, we can only infer that both require contacting their sales teams for tailored quotes, likely varying based on domain count and email volume.
5 / 5(1)
