Suped

Report-URI vs DMARCLytics

Choose Report-URI for in-depth, flexible DMARC data analysis, or DMARCLytics for a more guided DMARC implementation with direct support.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI offers granular control over DMARC reporting, allowing users to drill down into raw data for detailed analysis. Its strength lies in providing a comprehensive overview of email authentication, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, often favored by those who prefer to manage their own configurations.
The platform's extensive data logging capabilities make it a strong choice for technical users who need to process large volumes of authentication data and identify specific issues. We have found it to be highly flexible for custom integrations and unique reporting needs.
DMARCLytics provides a more guided experience, focusing on clear dashboards and actionable insights. It aims to simplify the DMARC implementation process with features like Hosted DMARC and an "unlimited SPF" option, which, while not true flattening, helps manage complex SPF records.
We found it particularly useful for organizations looking for a more hands-on approach to DMARC enforcement with a structured reporting interface. It clearly presents key DMARC metrics and compliance status, making it accessible for a broader audience.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
The Report-URI interface, while functional, reflects its origins as a tool built by and for technical users. It prioritizes data density and configuration options, which can feel somewhat overwhelming for newcomers.
Navigation can sometimes require a bit of exploration to find specific reports or settings. However, once accustomed, its power becomes apparent for those who enjoy a deep dive into logs and require high configurability.
DMARCLytics offers a cleaner, more streamlined user interface that is generally easier to navigate for less technical users. The dashboards present information clearly, with a focus on DMARC compliance status and potential threats.
Its guided setup process and intuitive reporting make it a good option for teams that prefer clarity and a quicker path to understanding their DMARC posture without requiring extensive technical knowledge.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI's support is primarily ticket-based, complemented by extensive documentation and a community forum. For users comfortable with self-service and technical documentation, this can be an efficient way to find answers.
However, direct, real-time assistance might require a bit more patience compared to platforms offering dedicated account management, especially when urgent issues arise. We have observed that the community is quite active and helpful.
DMARCLytics provides email support across all tiers, with more personalized options available at higher plans, including a "Dedicated DMARC Engineer" for Enterprise customers. This suggests a stronger focus on direct customer interaction.
We appreciate that this tiered approach can be invaluable for organizations seeking more hands-on guidance through their DMARC journey, ensuring they have expert assistance when needed.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI is best suited for tech-savvy SMBs and enterprises with internal security teams who want full control over their DMARC data. Its robust data access is a significant plus for those who prefer to integrate and analyze data with their own tools.
MSPs (managed service providers) might find its flexibility appealing for managing multiple client domains, provided they have the technical expertise to leverage its deeper functionalities and navigate its somewhat spartan interface.
DMARCLytics is a good fit for SMBs looking for a more structured and guided DMARC solution, as well as growing businesses needing clearer insights without requiring deep technical dives into raw data. Its user-friendliness lowers the barrier to entry.
Enterprise clients benefit from features like dedicated support and hosted solutions. MSPs could leverage its multi-domain management and clearer reporting for clients who prefer a simpler, more automated approach to DMARC enforcement.

How does Report-URI compare with DMARCLytics?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Report-URI's primary drawback is its interface, which, while powerful, can be intimidating for those not accustomed to deep technical analysis. The learning curve for leveraging its full capabilities can be steep. Support is also more self-service oriented, which may not suit all users. DMARCLytics, while user-friendly, appears to offer less granular control over raw data compared to Report-URI. Its feature set beyond core DMARC is also less comprehensive. With no public reviews on G2, it is harder to gauge widespread user satisfaction and identify common pain points.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Monitoring for PROs
What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks. Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system. It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Report-URI primarily caters to self-service with a free tier, requiring direct contact for higher volume plans, while DMARCLytics offers clear tiered monthly pricing, with a significant discount for annual commitments.
Logo
Logo
Small
Free tier available for limited use. Contact for higher volumes.
£9.99/month (Starter: 150k emails)
Medium
Contact for pricing
£9.99/month (Starter: 150k emails)
Large
Contact for pricing
£30/month (Business: 3M emails)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing (Enterprise)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Report-URI or DMARCLytics?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions