Suped

Report-URI vs DMARCly

Choose Report-URI for deep DMARC RPT analysis, and DMARCly for a feature-rich, integrated email security suite.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We recall Report-URI's robust reporting for RUA and RUF, offering a clear, albeit sometimes dense, view into DMARC compliance. It excels in parsing complex data streams, presenting them in an actionable format. The focus is heavily on raw DMARC data analysis and reporting, providing detailed insights into email authentication.
While its DMARC report analysis is highly granular and offers extensive control, it can sometimes feel geared towards users with a solid technical background. Report-URI provides the tools to monitor DMARC enforcement and identify sending sources effectively, making it a strong choice for those who want to dive deep into the data.
We've found DMARCly to offer a more integrated email security suite, simplifying the setup for multiple protocols. This includes robust DMARC report analysis alongside features like SPF flattening, BIMI support, and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT monitoring. It aims to be a comprehensive platform for all email authentication needs.
DMARCly's feature set extends beyond basic DMARC reporting to incorporate broader email deliverability and security elements such as IP reputation monitoring and DNS timeline. This holistic approach means users get a wider array of tools under one roof, which can be particularly appealing for those looking for an all-in-one solution.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We've observed Report-URI's interface is functional and direct. It provides extensive detail, which is excellent for DMARC specialists who require granular insights and are comfortable navigating complex data sets. The dashboard prioritizes data presentation, offering a deep dive into email traffic and DMARC compliance.
However, this depth can sometimes lead to a steeper learning curve for new users or those less familiar with the intricacies of DMARC reporting. While highly effective for technical users, others might find its visual design less intuitive, requiring a bit more effort to interpret the information presented.
DMARCly offers a more polished and intuitive user experience. The dashboards are generally cleaner and easier to navigate, presenting complex DMARC data in a more digestible format. We appreciate their effort to simplify the onboarding process, making it more accessible for a wider range of users.
The visual presentation of reports and alerts in DMARCly is designed for clarity, which makes it easier for users who are not daily DMARC experts to quickly grasp their domain's email authentication status. Its user-friendly approach helps in making informed decisions without getting bogged down in excessive technical detail.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Our experience with Report-URI's support has shown it to be highly technical and responsive, especially for complex DMARC issues. They primarily offer email-based support, which typically provides detailed answers and guidance for troubleshooting specific DMARC configurations or reporting anomalies.
It's worth noting that live support options are less prominent, which might mean a slight delay for urgent queries. However, for in-depth technical assistance where detailed explanations are required, their email support is generally comprehensive and effective, catering to a more technically oriented user base.
DMARCly provides live chat support across its Growth, Business, and Enterprise plans, alongside email support for all tiers. We've found their live chat to be efficient for quicker resolutions and immediate questions, making it a good choice for those who prefer more interactive assistance.
Beyond direct support channels, DMARCly also offers a comprehensive knowledge base and thorough documentation. This allows users to self-service many common questions and issues, which complements their responsive live chat and email support, providing a multi-faceted support system.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI is particularly well-suited for technically proficient users, IT professionals, and larger organizations that require granular control and deep dives into raw DMARC data. Its focus on detailed reporting and analytics makes it a powerful tool for those with in-house DMARC expertise.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), it offers the core functionality needed for DMARC monitoring, though it lacks specific multi-tenancy features that simplify managing multiple client domains. Enterprise users will appreciate its robust reporting capabilities, while Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs) might find it a bit overwhelming without dedicated DMARC expertise or a technical team.
DMARCly caters well to a broader audience, from SMBs seeking a more user-friendly interface to enterprise clients needing a comprehensive email security suite. Its integrated approach, combining DMARC with SPF, BIMI, and MTA-STS, offers a more complete solution for email authentication.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), its domain grouping and multiple user features make it more adaptable for managing various clients, especially in higher tiers. Enterprise users benefit from API access and Single Sign-On (SSO), and Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs) will find its simplified setup and broader feature set, including SPF flattening, quite appealing for maintaining good deliverability and security posture.

How does Report-URI compare with DMARCly?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Report-URI's primary drawback lies in its somewhat less intuitive user interface, which can be challenging for those without a strong DMARC background. Its deep technical focus, while a strength for experts, can create a steeper learning curve for new users. DMARCly, while feature-rich, can become more expensive as domain and message volumes increase, with tiered pricing that might push smaller businesses into higher plans quickly if they exceed quotas for email volume or domains.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Monitoring for PROs
What do you like best about Report URI? What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. What do you dislike about Report URI? Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks Recommendations to others considering Report URI: Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you? It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Report-URI offers a generous free tier and transparent, usage-based pricing, while DMARCly structures its pricing around a tiered model with specific domain and message quotas, scaling up significantly for higher volumes and features.
Logo
Logo
Small
Free (10k messages, 10 domains)
Professional: $17.99 (up to 100k messages, min 2 domains)
Medium
£10/month (100k messages, 20 domains)
Professional: $17.99 (up to 100k messages, min 2 domains)
Large
Contact for pricing
Business: $69 (up to 1M messages, min 15 domains)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Enterprise: $199 (up to 5M messages + over-quota)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Report-URI or DMARCly?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Report-URI vs DMARCly DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped