Report-URI offers a comprehensive suite of tools for DMARC, SPF, and DKIM reporting. We found it provides granular detail into email authentication results, which is excellent for those who need to deep-dive into every aspect of their email streams. It parses DMARC aggregate reports, offering views on authentication success, failures, and sending sources.
Beyond DMARC, it extends its capabilities to content security policy (CSP), HTTP public key pinning (HPKP), and certificate transparency (CT) reporting. This breadth of features makes it a powerful option for organizations with diverse security reporting needs, but also adds to its complexity.
DMARC SaaS focuses on simplifying the entire DMARC adoption and management process. We observed that it aims to provide a more guided experience, abstracting away some of the underlying complexities of email authentication. Its platform emphasizes automated detection of sending sources and helps in easily adjusting DMARC policies.
It positions itself with both automated and partner-managed DMARC solutions. This dual approach caters to businesses that prefer a hands-on approach with a user-friendly interface, as well as those that require a fully managed service to ensure compliance and protection without dedicated internal resources.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Our experience with Report-URI indicates a steeper learning curve, especially for those new to DMARC. The interface, while functional, prioritizes data density over immediate visual simplicity. Navigating through the various reports and understanding the implications requires a solid grasp of email authentication protocols.
While highly capable, users might find themselves consulting documentation frequently initially. It’s a tool built for technical users who appreciate direct access to information and are comfortable with a more raw data presentation rather than heavily abstracted dashboards.
DMARC SaaS aims for a more intuitive and streamlined user experience. We found its dashboards to be cleaner and more focused on actionable insights, making it easier for users to understand their DMARC status and identify issues quickly. The platform is designed to guide users through the process of achieving DMARC enforcement.
Its focus on automation and managed services contributes to a lower barrier to entry. While it provides essential data, it often presents it in a way that minimizes the need for deep technical interpretation, catering to users who want effective DMARC without getting lost in the weeds.
Which product has the best support
Support
Report-URI's support model often relies heavily on comprehensive documentation and community resources. For users with technical proficiency, these resources are usually sufficient for troubleshooting and understanding advanced features. Direct support typically becomes more accessible with higher-tier, paid subscriptions.
Our observations suggest that while the self-service options are robust, users requiring personalized, hands-on assistance might need to opt for plans that include dedicated support channels. This approach works well for independent experts but can be a hurdle for organizations needing immediate, guided help.
DMARC SaaS generally places a strong emphasis on providing hands-on support, particularly with its partner-managed DMARC offerings. We noticed that their support aims to guide users through the setup, monitoring, and policy enforcement phases, which is beneficial for organizations that prefer a more assisted approach.
This level of guidance can be invaluable for ensuring successful DMARC implementation and ongoing compliance, especially for those who may not have extensive in-house DMARC expertise. They often highlight their ability to handle the complexities of DMARC on behalf of their clients.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Report-URI is best suited for organizations with in-house email security expertise, particularly those needing detailed insights into DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and other security policies like CSP. Its robust data presentation makes it ideal for forensic analysis and advanced troubleshooting.
For MSPs, it's a powerful tool if they have the technical staff to leverage its depth for multiple clients. Enterprise clients with dedicated security teams will find its extensive reporting capabilities valuable. However, SMBs might find its technical nature overwhelming without expert guidance.
DMARC SaaS is ideal for organizations seeking a more managed or simplified approach to DMARC implementation and ongoing maintenance. Its user-friendly interface and automated features cater to those who prioritize ease of use and streamlined workflows.
It's an excellent fit for MSPs looking to efficiently manage DMARC for a portfolio of clients without needing deep technical dives for each. Enterprise businesses seeking an effective, less hands-on solution, and SMBs wanting strong email protection without significant internal resources, will find it highly suitable.
How does Report-URI compare with DMARC SaaS?
DMARC report analysis
Parses and presents DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Source detection
Identifies legitimate and illegitimate email sending sources.
Forward detection
Detects email forwarding that can impact DMARC authentication.
Spoof detection
Identifies attempts to spoof your domain.
Notifications and alerts
Provides alerts for DMARC issues or changes.
Reporting
Offers customizable reports on DMARC performance.
API
Application programming interface for integration.
Multi-tenancy
Supports managing multiple domains or clients.
SPF flattening
Helps manage SPF record lookup limits.
Requires manual management or third-party tools.
Often included in managed DMARC services.
Hosted DMARC
Provides DMARC record hosting and management.
Focuses on reporting, not record hosting.
Core offering of a DMARC SaaS platform.
BIMI
Supports Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Not a primary focus of the platform.
Often integrated with DMARC for brand visibility.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Supports secure email transport protocols.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors IP reputation and blocklist (or blacklist) status.
Offers some reputation monitoring capabilities.
Primary focus is DMARC, not general reputation.
AI copilot
AI-powered assistant for DMARC insights.
Does not feature an AI copilot.
Does not feature an AI copilot.
DNS monitoring
Monitors changes to DNS records beyond DMARC.
Not a core feature.
Not a core feature.
Self hostable
Option to host the software on private infrastructure.
Cloud-based SaaS solution.
Cloud-based SaaS solution.
Free trial/free tier
Offers a free version or trial period.
Has a generous free tier.
No public free tier or trial offered.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Report-URI, while powerful, can present a steep learning curve due to its data-rich interface and technical focus. Users sometimes report difficulty managing (e.g. deleting) certain trackers if they are still receiving traffic. DMARC SaaS, on the other hand, lacks public reviews, making it challenging to gauge community sentiment, and its pricing can be less transparent due to a contact-for-pricing model.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
5 / 5(1)
0 / 5(0)
Monitoring for PROs
5.0 / 5
What do you like best about Report URI?What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great.What do you dislike about Report URI?Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networksRecommendations to others considering Report URI:Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific systemWhat problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you?It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Pricing
Report-URI offers a free tier for basic DMARC monitoring, scaling up with paid plans based on data volume, while DMARC SaaS primarily operates on a contact-for-pricing model, emphasizing tailored solutions like automated or partner-managed DMARC.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Free tier available for basic usage
Contact for pricing
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Starts at ~$15/month
Contact for pricing
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Starts at ~$100/month
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Custom pricing
Contact for pricing
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with Report-URI or DMARC SaaS?
5 / 5(1)
