Suped

Report-URI vs DMARC Manager

Choose Report-URI for deep technical insights, choose DMARC Manager for a straightforward experience.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI is undeniably powerful for those who thrive on granular data. Its core strength lies in its raw DMARC aggregate and forensic (RUA/RUF) reporting capabilities. We found it provided an extensive array of filters and visualization options, allowing us to slice and dice data in numerous ways. This platform truly caters to the technically inclined, offering deep dives into email authentication issues.
Beyond just DMARC, Report-URI also supports various other security policies like CSP (Content Security Policy) and HPKP (HTTP Public Key Pinning), which, while not directly DMARC-related, demonstrate its breadth as a security reporting service. Its interface, while functional, prioritizes data density over sleek design, giving us all the details we could ever want, sometimes almost too many.
DMARC Manager, in contrast, aims for simplicity and ease of use. It focuses squarely on DMARC reporting, presenting data in a much more digestible format. We appreciated its intuitive dashboards that quickly highlighted key issues without overwhelming us with technical jargon. For domains with fewer complexities, or for teams without dedicated DMARC experts, this approach is a significant advantage.
Its feature set is robust enough for most standard DMARC implementations, offering clear visibility into authentication results, sending sources, and potential threats. While it might not offer the same level of raw data manipulation as Report-URI, its guided setup and actionable insights make it highly effective for quickly achieving DMARC enforcement. We found it strikes a good balance between functionality and user-friendliness.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Navigating Report-URI requires a certain level of technical proficiency. The interface is packed with information, which is excellent for detailed analysis but can feel overwhelming for newcomers. We sometimes found ourselves digging through menus to find specific filters or reports, a process that is efficient once mastered, but has a learning curve. The emphasis is on functionality, so aesthetic polish takes a backseat.
Setting up DMARC records and integrating them with Report-URI is straightforward for those familiar with DNS management. However, interpreting the initial reports and understanding the nuances of various authentication failures definitely benefits from prior DMARC knowledge. It's a tool built by engineers, for engineers, and we recognize that its power comes at the cost of a steeper onboarding process.
DMARC Manager excels in user experience with its clean and modern interface. From initial setup to daily monitoring, we found the platform to be highly intuitive. The dashboards provide at-a-glance summaries of DMARC compliance, making it easy to spot trends or issues quickly. The guided workflows helped streamline the process of moving through DMARC enforcement stages.
Its focus on simplification means that even users new to DMARC can grasp the core concepts and take action with confidence. We especially liked the clear recommendations for policy adjustments, which helped us optimize our DMARC records without needing extensive external research. It makes DMARC management feel less like a chore and more like an achievable goal.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI offers support primarily through documentation and a community forum. For highly technical questions, we found the forum to be a valuable resource, with many experienced users and occasionally staff members contributing. However, direct, personalized support can be less immediate than what we might expect from a SaaS platform.
Their documentation is comprehensive, covering many common issues and configuration steps. For those accustomed to self-service and leveraging community wisdom, the support model works well. If you prefer direct, hands-on assistance, you might find yourselves waiting a bit longer for detailed responses.
DMARC Manager provides customer support through email and potentially in-app chat, depending on the plan. We found their responses to be timely and helpful, often guiding us through specific configuration challenges. This more direct approach to support is beneficial for users who prefer guided assistance over extensive self-discovery.
Their knowledge base also covers the essentials, making it easier to troubleshoot common problems. The overall support experience felt more aligned with a traditional SaaS offering, which is a plus for those who value readily available assistance from a support team when navigating DMARC complexities.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI is particularly well-suited for organizations with complex email infrastructures, or those that have dedicated security and email teams. MSPs (managed service providers) looking for a tool that offers deep customization and raw data access for multiple clients might find its capabilities invaluable, assuming they have the technical resources to leverage them fully. Enterprises with specific reporting needs and integration requirements will also appreciate its depth.
It's less ideal for SMBs (small to medium businesses) or individuals who need a plug-and-play solution without heavy technical involvement. The learning curve and feature set can be overkill for simpler DMARC implementations. Its strength truly shines when comprehensive data analysis and multi-protocol reporting are paramount.
DMARC Manager is an excellent fit for SMBs and organizations that need a clear, actionable DMARC solution without the overhead of overly complex dashboards. It simplifies the DMARC journey, making it accessible to a broader audience, including marketing teams and general IT staff. MSPs can also benefit from its straightforward client management capabilities, offering a streamlined approach to DMARC for their smaller clients.
While capable, larger enterprises with highly specific, advanced DMARC forensic analysis needs might find its reporting slightly less granular than Report-URI. However, for most standard DMARC enforcement goals, it provides more than enough functionality in a user-friendly package. Its focus on ease of use makes it a strong contender for those prioritizing efficiency and clarity.

How does Report-URI compare with DMARC Manager?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When evaluating these platforms, we noted a few areas that might be less than ideal. Report-URI, while feature-rich, can be daunting for those without a strong technical background, and its user interface isn't the most modern. DMARC Manager prioritizes simplicity, which means it might lack the deep forensic analysis capabilities that highly technical users or large enterprises with complex needs might require.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Monitoring for PROs
What do you like best about Report URI? What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. What do you dislike about Report URI? Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks Recommendations to others considering Report URI: Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you? It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Report-URI offers a tiered pricing structure with a free plan for low volume, while DMARC Manager primarily offers a free trial with details available upon contact.
Logo
Logo
Small
Free tier available
Contact for pricing
Medium
Paid tiers
Contact for pricing
Large
Paid tiers
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Report-URI or DMARC Manager?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions