Suped

Parseddmarc vs Splunk TA-DMARC add-on

Choose Parseddmarc for a simple, CLI-based solution, or Splunk TA-DMARC for integrated Splunk environments.
Parseddmarc
Compare to Suped
Parseddmarc
Logo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Parseddmarc
Logo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Parseddmarc is primarily a DMARC report parsing utility. It excels at consuming various types of DMARC aggregate (RUA) and forensic (RUF) reports, along with SMTP TLS Reporting, from sources like IMAP, Microsoft Graph, or the Gmail API. Its core strength lies in its ability to process these raw reports and output structured JSON or CSV data, making it a flexible backend for custom DMARC analysis.
While Parseddmarc provides the raw data, it doesn't offer a graphical user interface for visualizing DMARC compliance. Organizations using Parseddmarc typically integrate its output into other systems like Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, Splunk, or Apache Kafka to build their own dashboards and alerting mechanisms. This approach offers significant customization potential, but requires additional setup and configuration.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is designed to integrate DMARC reporting directly into an existing Splunk environment. It parses DMARC aggregate reports and indexes the data within Splunk, allowing users to leverage Splunk's powerful search, correlation, and visualization capabilities. The add-on often comes with pre-built dashboards that provide insights into DMARC compliance, sources, and failures.
This add-on is excellent for organizations already heavily invested in Splunk for their security information and event management (SIEM) or operational intelligence. It allows DMARC data to be correlated with other logs and data sources within Splunk, offering a more holistic view of email security. However, its functionality is tied directly to the Splunk platform, so it's not a standalone DMARC solution.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Parseddmarc
Logo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
The user experience for Parseddmarc is command-line driven. For those comfortable with Python and shell scripting, it's quite straightforward to set up and run. We found the documentation clear enough to get started with parsing reports and outputting data. However, for a complete DMARC monitoring solution, you'll need to integrate Parseddmarc with a separate data visualization tool, which adds a layer of complexity.
There's no graphical interface to interact with Parseddmarc directly. Its "user experience" is more about programmatic interaction and backend processing. While it provides immense flexibility for developers and system administrators, it's not a turn-key solution for non-technical users looking for immediate visual insights into their DMARC compliance. It demands a DIY approach to creating a front-end for the data.
For existing Splunk users, the TA-DMARC add-on's user experience is seamless. It integrates directly into the familiar Splunk interface, leveraging its search language (SPL) and dashboarding capabilities. Once the add-on is installed and configured to ingest DMARC reports, data appears within Splunk, and users can interact with pre-built dashboards or create their own custom visualizations.
However, for those new to Splunk, there's a significant learning curve. Splunk itself is a powerful but complex platform, and mastering SPL and its intricacies takes time. While the DMARC add-on simplifies the DMARC data ingestion, the overall user experience is dictated by the user's proficiency with Splunk. It's not a standalone, easy-to-use DMARC reporting tool for those without Splunk expertise.
Which product has the best support

Support

Parseddmarc
Logo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As an open-source project, Parseddmarc relies on community support. We've found that issues and questions are typically handled through GitHub issues, where developers and contributors provide assistance. There's no dedicated support team or official service level agreements (SLAs) for Parseddmarc. If you encounter a bug or need help, you're dependent on the goodwill and availability of the open-source community.
This model of support can be highly effective for straightforward problems or for users who are comfortable troubleshooting and contributing themselves. However, for critical, time-sensitive issues, or for organizations that require guaranteed response times, the lack of formal support can be a significant drawback. It requires internal expertise to maintain and resolve issues.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is explicitly listed as "Not Supported" by its developer and is also archived. This means there's no official support channel or team available for assistance with the add-on itself. If you run into problems, you'll need to rely on the general Splunk community, online forums, or your own internal Splunk experts to troubleshoot and resolve issues.
While Splunk itself offers robust enterprise support for its core platform, this support does not extend to community-contributed add-ons like the TA-DMARC. The archived status further implies that it may not receive future updates or bug fixes, which can be a concern for long-term reliability and security. Any maintenance falls squarely on the user's organization.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Parseddmarc
Logo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Parseddmarc is best suited for organizations with strong internal technical capabilities, particularly those with Python expertise and a desire for maximum control over their DMARC data processing. It's ideal for developers, system administrators, and security analysts who want to build custom DMARC reporting solutions or integrate DMARC data into existing security dashboards. For small to medium businesses (SMBs) without a dedicated IT security team, it might be overly complex.
Enterprise users can leverage Parseddmarc as a component within a larger security infrastructure, especially if they have specific compliance or data retention requirements that necessitate a self-hosted solution. Managed Service Providers (MSPs) could potentially build a multi-tenant DMARC offering around Parseddmarc, but it would require significant development effort to create a user-friendly interface and management layer. It's a foundational tool, not an end-user product.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is explicitly designed for enterprise organizations that are already established users of Splunk. If your organization relies on Splunk for log management, security analytics, or operational intelligence, this add-on provides a convenient way to consolidate DMARC data within your existing ecosystem. It's not suitable for SMBs or organizations without a pre-existing Splunk deployment.
For MSPs, integrating this add-on into a client's Splunk instance can be valuable, but deploying and managing Splunk itself often comes with considerable cost and complexity. While the add-on allows for DMARC data to be viewed alongside other security events, its archived and unsupported status makes it a less ideal choice for new deployments or for those seeking long-term, vendor-supported DMARC solutions. It's a niche tool for a specific audience.

How does Parseddmarc compare with Splunk TA-DMARC add-on?

Parseddmarc
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Both Parseddmarc and the Splunk TA-DMARC add-on are robust open-source tools for processing DMARC reports, but their primary drawback is the significant technical overhead required for setup, maintenance, and building out a complete DMARC monitoring system. Parseddmarc offers raw data flexibility but demands custom development for visualization and alerting. The Splunk add-on integrates well into existing Splunk deployments but suffers from its archived, unsupported status, presenting long-term reliability and security concerns. Neither offers a fully managed, out-of-the-box solution.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Parseddmarc
Logo

Pricing

Both Parseddmarc and the Splunk TA-DMARC add-on are free, open-source tools, but their true cost comes from the significant infrastructure and expertise required to host and manage them.
Parseddmarc
Logo
Small
Free, self-hosted, infrastructure costs vary.
Free add-on, requires Splunk instance, infrastructure costs vary.
Medium
Free, self-hosted, infrastructure costs vary.
Free add-on, requires Splunk instance, infrastructure costs vary.
Large
Free, self-hosted, infrastructure costs vary.
Free add-on, requires Splunk instance, infrastructure costs vary.
Enterprise
Free, self-hosted, infrastructure costs vary.
Free add-on, requires Splunk instance, infrastructure costs vary.

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Parseddmarc or Splunk TA-DMARC add-on?
Parseddmarc
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions