Suped

OnDMARC vs Docker DMARC Reports

Choose OnDMARC for enterprise, Docker for self-hosting.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC provides a comprehensive suite of features beyond basic DMARC reporting. Its dynamic services allow for the management of SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI, all from a unified platform. We found the Investigate tool particularly useful for instant deliverability diagnostics.
Beyond core authentication, OnDMARC offers forensic reporting, API access for integration, and smart alerts to proactively notify us of issues. Higher tiers include advanced features like Radar Pro for threat intelligence, DNS Guardian, Event Hub for SIEM integration, and Global IP Lookup. It is a feature-rich, managed solution.
Docker DMARC Reports, as an open-source project, offers a more barebones feature set. Its primary function is to parse DMARC aggregate (RUA) reports and display them in a basic web interface. We appreciate that it provides a foundational view of DMARC compliance, showing email sources and authentication results.
However, it lacks advanced features like forensic reporting (RUA reports only), active spoof detection, and integrated management of other email authentication protocols. It relies on the user to manually configure DNS records and does not offer dynamic SPF flattening, BIMI support, or MTA-STS. It is a simple tool for basic DMARC visibility.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC generally offers a smooth and intuitive user experience, designed for both DMARC novices and seasoned professionals. We found its guided workflows helpful for setting up DMARC records and moving towards enforcement. The dashboard provides a clear overview of email authentication status, with visual reporting to easily identify misconfigurations.
While some users mention the interface can be a bit overwhelming or clunky at times due to the sheer volume of data and features, the learning curve is mitigated by clear guidance and responsive support. Once familiar, the single pane of glass approach simplifies managing multiple domains and complex authentication protocols.
Docker DMARC Reports provides a straightforward, albeit functional, user interface. It focuses on presenting aggregate report data clearly, allowing us to see authentication results and sending sources. Its simplicity means less clutter, which can be a plus for users only needing basic DMARC visualization.
However, the user experience for setup and maintenance is entirely self-managed. We need significant technical expertise to deploy, configure, and troubleshoot the Docker containers, IMAP mailbox, and database. There are no guided wizards or interactive tools, making it less accessible for those without strong technical backgrounds.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC is highly regarded for its excellent customer support. We experienced responsive, knowledgeable assistance from their team, which is crucial when navigating complex email security configurations. They offer email support across all tiers, with chat and phone support, dedicated account managers, and custom SLAs available in higher-tier plans.
Their support extends to proactive engagement, with regular check-ins and account reviews to ensure optimal DMARC implementation and compliance. This level of guided assistance helps users confidently move to enforcement policies, and they are generally quick to resolve any dashboard inconsistencies or configuration issues we encountered.
Docker DMARC Reports, being an open-source project, does not offer traditional commercial support. Support primarily comes from the community through GitHub issues or forums. We found that users are responsible for their own setup, maintenance, and troubleshooting, which requires significant internal expertise.
While the project's documentation is available, it requires technical interpretation and hands-on implementation. There are no dedicated support teams, account managers, or SLAs. This model is ideal for those comfortable with self-sufficiency and open-source collaboration, but it can be challenging if we need immediate, expert assistance.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC is highly suitable for SMBs, mid-market companies, and large enterprises that require a robust, managed DMARC solution. Its tiered pricing model and feature set cater to growing organizations looking for comprehensive email security, including SPF flattening, BIMI, and advanced threat intelligence.
For MSPs (managed service providers), OnDMARC offers features like multi-tenancy and user permissioning, making it an excellent choice for managing DMARC for multiple clients. Organizations prioritizing ease of use, comprehensive features, and dedicated support will find OnDMARC to be a strong fit, even with its higher price point.
Docker DMARC Reports is best suited for technically proficient individuals, small development teams, or organizations with a strong DevOps culture that prefer open-source solutions and self-hosting. It is an ideal choice for those who want full control over their data and infrastructure and are comfortable with manual configuration and maintenance.
It is less suitable for SMBs, mid-market, or enterprise organizations that lack the in-house technical resources for self-hosting or require advanced features, dedicated support, or multi-tenancy capabilities (for MSPs). While free, the total cost of ownership can increase due to the time and expertise needed for setup and ongoing management.

How does OnDMARC compare with Docker DMARC Reports?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When evaluating OnDMARC, a common feedback point revolves around its user interface. While powerful, some users find it can be a bit overwhelming or clunky to navigate, especially for those new to DMARC. Also, the cost of certain advanced features (add-on modules) or higher tiers can be a consideration. For Docker DMARC Reports, the primary drawbacks stem from its self-hosted, open-source nature. It requires significant technical expertise for setup and ongoing maintenance, and it lacks many advanced features and dedicated support that commercial products offer.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Great for Managing Multiple DMAC Traces, Needs Auto-Triage for Forensic Reports
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?Managing multiple DMARC traces has become much simpler. By enabling BIMI, we were able to significantly reduce our key risks with both customers and partners.What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?There is a need for automatic triaging of forensic reports, along with notifications if any anomalies are detected.What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?BIMI helps our customers and partners recognize phishing scams more easily.
Verified User in Retail
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Dynamic SPF and Powerful Features, GUI Could Use Improvement
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?I have been using Red Sift OnDMARC for over three years for monitoring DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across multiple domains, which would be difficult to manage without such a tool. It offers the ease of dynamic SPF and dynamic DMARC, which simplify complex monitoring tasks. The software provides a powerful set of features, making any initial setup challenges worthwhile. I especially value the single pane of glass interface as an IT administrator managing domains that engineers use, allowing me to track domain usage, detect spam issues, and dynamically update DMARC, DKIM, and SPF with ease. The dynamic SPF and DMARC/DKIM reports are integral for my operations, as they save considerable time by turning potentially lengthy tasks into several-minute jobs. Furthermore, the friendliness and support from our account manager, alongside our quarterly meetings, enhance the overall experience and decision to continue using the platform.What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?I find the GUI a little bit difficult to navigate sometimes and a bit clunky, which sometimes makes it hard to find what I want.What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?I use the product to monitor DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across domains, simplifying updates and detecting spam issues with ease. It turns lengthy tasks into minutes, providing a comprehensive view of domain usage and security.
Brice P.
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC implementation with great visibility
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?OnDMARC makes it very easy to set up and maintain DMARC records. The guided workflows and clear reporting helped us move from monitoring to full enforcement confidently. The user interface is intuitive, and support is very responsive whenever we have questions.What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?It would be helpful if some of the reporting dashboards allowed more customization or export options. Sometimes, the volume of daily reports can feel overwhelming without filtering.What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?It is helping us prevent domain spoofing and phishing attacks by enforcing DMARC policies. It has also improved visibility into who is sending emails on behalf of our domain, so we can take quick action if needed. Overall, it has strengthened our email security posture and improved trust in our communications.
Shashi K.
SR Manager IT Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
It is quite a useful tool to manage SPF/DKIM/DMARC records and understand it's impact on the domain.
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?The ease of using the application and the UI that is provides that helps in managing the records of the domain. Plus the customer service for the tool is quite responsive.What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?The limitation of the feature of MTA-STS, in which it reports only a few of the domains.What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?It helps us in getting a clearer picture of the use case of our domain, plus the acceptance and the rejection rate.
Ashman B.
CyberSecurity Analyst Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC setup
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?We have had OnDMARC for several years, we onboarded all of our managed domains over the past 12months. It was very easy adding SPF, DKIM records and moving DMARC to 100% Reject. We had support from Red Sift all the way.What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?Sometimes the dashboard is misleading, i had moved a domain to reject 50% and the dashboard didn't reflect that. but customer support fixed that very quicklyWhat problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?Securing our domains to bring them up to 100% Reject
Verified User in Law Practice
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

Pricing

OnDMARC offers tiered SaaS pricing with a free trial, starting at an affordable rate for small to large email volumes, while Docker DMARC Reports is a free, self-hosted open-source solution requiring technical resources for implementation.
Logo
Logo
Small
$9 USD/month (billed annually)
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
$9 USD/month (billed annually)
Free (self-hosted)
Large
$9 USD/month (billed annually)
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with OnDMARC or Docker DMARC Reports?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions