Suped

OnDMARC vs DMARC 25

Choose OnDMARC for robust features, choose DMARC 25 for basic monitoring.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC provides a comprehensive suite of features, moving beyond basic DMARC reporting to include Dynamic SPF, DKIM management, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI. We found its 'Investigate' tool particularly useful for diagnosing deliverability issues instantly, providing deep insights into email authentication flows.
Higher tiers also offer advanced capabilities like forensic reporting, API access, smart alerts, DNS Guardian, and Event Hub integration. The platform's Radar AI feature helps identify sophisticated threats, offering a strong defense against various email-based attacks.
DMARC 25 focuses on core DMARC report monitoring, offering a straightforward approach to understanding your email's authentication status. It provides the essential visibility needed to begin your DMARC journey, helping to identify legitimate and unauthorized email sources.
While effective for fundamental DMARC oversight, DMARC 25 does not publicly advertise advanced features such as SPF flattening, BIMI support, or integrated DNS management. Its primary strength lies in its simplicity and direct focus on DMARC reporting without additional complexities.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC generally offers a clean, intuitive dashboard that makes DMARC management accessible. Many users praise its guided workflows for moving to full enforcement. We found its interface easy to navigate once familiar, though some areas could be overwhelming for complete novices.
Despite some comments about the GUI being a bit clunky at times, the overall consensus is that OnDMARC simplifies complex tasks. The visual reporting and step-by-step guidance aid in quickly identifying misconfigured senders and threats, making the user experience largely positive.
DMARC 25 presents a minimalist interface, prioritizing ease of access to essential DMARC reports. Its focus on core functionality means less clutter and a quicker learning curve for users primarily interested in monitoring email authentication.
The user experience is designed for simplicity, making it a good choice for those who prefer a no-frills tool. However, this simplicity also means it lacks the richer data visualization and advanced diagnostic tools found in more comprehensive platforms.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC receives consistent praise for its excellent and responsive customer support. Users frequently mention dedicated account managers, regular check-ins, and knowledgeable technical teams. Their support ranges from email assistance to chat and phone support in higher tiers.
We found the support staff to be proactive and very helpful in guiding through implementation and resolving issues. The presence of annual or quarterly account reviews for Essentials and Premier plans further enhances the support experience, ensuring long-term success.
DMARC 25 directs users to contact their sales team via phone or web form for pricing and support inquiries. While specific details about their support quality are not publicly available, this direct contact model suggests a more personalized, possibly less scalable, support approach.
Without transparent information on support channels or SLAs, it is difficult to fully assess their responsiveness or expertise. Customers would need to engage directly to understand the level of support offered beyond initial setup.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC is highly suitable for enterprise organizations and mid-market businesses that require comprehensive email security. Its advanced features, scalability for thousands of domains, and robust support make it ideal for complex environments. It's also a strong contender for MSPs managing multiple client domains.
The platform's ability to handle dynamic SPF, BIMI, MTA-STS, and detailed forensic reporting caters to organizations with sophisticated security needs and a desire for proactive threat detection and brand protection. It's a full-featured solution for those aiming for 100% DMARC enforcement.
DMARC 25 is best suited for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) or individuals who need a straightforward tool to monitor their DMARC reports. Its free trial and direct approach to DMARC data make it accessible for those just starting their email authentication journey or with limited budgets.
It offers basic DMARC report visibility without the complexities of advanced features. While it serves a foundational role in DMARC implementation, it might not be the ideal choice for large enterprises, MSPs, or organizations requiring extensive brand protection, multi-tenancy, or highly customized reporting.

How does OnDMARC compare with DMARC 25?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

OnDMARC's main drawbacks often revolve around its user interface, which some users find clunky or overwhelming initially, and the pricing of some advanced add-on modules. DMARC 25, conversely, offers very limited transparency regarding its pricing and features, making it challenging for potential users to make informed decisions without direct sales contact. Its feature set appears basic compared to more robust solutions.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Great for Managing Multiple DMAC Traces, Needs Auto-Triage for Forensic Reports
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? Managing multiple DMARC traces has become much simpler. By enabling BIMI, we were able to significantly reduce our key risks with both customers and partners. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? There is a need for automatic triaging of forensic reports, along with notifications if any anomalies are detected. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? BIMI helps our customers and partners recognize phishing scams more easily.
Verified User in Retail
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Dynamic SPF and Powerful Features, GUI Could Use Improvement
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? I have been using Red Sift OnDMARC for over three years for monitoring DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across multiple domains, which would be difficult to manage without such a tool. It offers the ease of dynamic SPF and dynamic DMARC, which simplify complex monitoring tasks. The software provides a powerful set of features, making any initial setup challenges worthwhile. I especially value the single pane of glass interface as an IT administrator managing domains that engineers use, allowing me to track domain usage, detect spam issues, and dynamically update DMARC, DKIM, and SPF with ease. The dynamic SPF and DMARC/DKIM reports are integral for my operations, as they save considerable time by turning potentially lengthy tasks into several-minute jobs. Furthermore, the friendliness and support from our account manager, alongside our quarterly meetings, enhance the overall experience and decision to continue using the platform. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? I find the GUI a little bit difficult to navigate sometimes and a bit clunky, which sometimes makes it hard to find what I want. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? I use the product to monitor DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across domains, simplifying updates and detecting spam issues with ease. It turns lengthy tasks into minutes, providing a comprehensive view of domain usage and security.
Brice P.
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC implementation with great visibility
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? OnDMARC makes it very easy to set up and maintain DMARC records. The guided workflows and clear reporting helped us move from monitoring to full enforcement confidently. The user interface is intuitive, and support is very responsive whenever we have questions. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? It would be helpful if some of the reporting dashboards allowed more customization or export options. Sometimes, the volume of daily reports can feel overwhelming without filtering. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? It is helping us prevent domain spoofing and phishing attacks by enforcing DMARC policies. It has also improved visibility into who is sending emails on behalf of our domain, so we can take quick action if needed. Overall, it has strengthened our email security posture and improved trust in our communications.
Shashi K.
SR Manager IT Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
It is quite a useful tool to manage SPF/DKIM/DMARC records and understand it's impact on the domain.
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? The ease of using the application and the UI that is provides that helps in managing the records of the domain. Plus the customer service for the tool is quite responsive. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? The limitation of the feature of MTA-STS, in which it reports only a few of the domains. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? It helps us in getting a clearer picture of the use case of our domain, plus the acceptance and the rejection rate.
Ashman B.
CyberSecurity Analyst Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC setup
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? We have had OnDMARC for several years, we onboarded all of our managed domains over the past 12months. It was very easy adding SPF, DKIM records and moving DMARC to 100% Reject. We had support from Red Sift all the way. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? Sometimes the dashboard is misleading, i had moved a domain to reject 50% and the dashboard didn't reflect that. but customer support fixed that very quickly What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? Securing our domains to bring them up to 100% Reject
Verified User in Law Practice
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

Pricing

OnDMARC offers clear tiered pricing with a paid Express plan and higher tiers requiring sales contact, while DMARC 25 maintains complete opacity, only providing a free trial and requiring direct contact for all other pricing.
Logo
Logo
Small
$9-12/month (Express)
Contact for pricing
Medium
$9-12/month (Express)
Contact for pricing
Large
$9-12/month (Express)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with OnDMARC or DMARC 25?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions