OnDMARC offers a comprehensive suite of features beyond basic DMARC reporting. Its Dynamic Services feature is a highlight, allowing for the management of SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI from a single interface. This is particularly useful for overcoming SPF lookup limits with its Dynamic SPF capabilities.
We found the 'Investigate' tool to be excellent for diagnosing deliverability issues. Depending on the plan, the platform also includes forensic reporting, API access, and smart alerts for anomaly detection. Higher tiers introduce advanced features like Radar Pro for deeper insights, DNS Guardian, and an Event Hub for SIEM integration.
Centera DMARC Compliance is less transparent about its feature set, with limited public information available. Based on the name, we would expect it to offer fundamental DMARC reporting and monitoring capabilities, helping organizations achieve DMARC compliance.
Without detailed documentation or user reviews, it is challenging to ascertain the depth of its features, such as advanced analytics, SPF flattening, or support for other email authentication protocols like BIMI or MTA-STS. We anticipate it covers the essentials but lacks the breadth of features found in more established platforms.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
OnDMARC generally receives high marks for its user-friendly interface and intuitive dashboard. We found the platform provides clear, actionable guidance, especially for DMARC implementation, moving from monitoring to enforcement. The step-by-step workflows are a significant aid.
However, some users have noted that the GUI can feel a bit clunky or overwhelming initially, particularly for those new to DMARC concepts. While the amount of data is robust, finding specific information or customizing reports might require some familiarity with the system.
For Centera DMARC Compliance, we have no direct user feedback or detailed product tours to evaluate its user experience. We would expect a DMARC compliance tool to offer a dashboard for viewing reports and managing records, but without hands-on experience or public information, we cannot definitively comment on its ease of use.
The lack of transparency around its interface and workflow means potential users would need to engage directly with Centera to assess whether it meets their expectations for usability and navigation. This makes it difficult to compare objectively against other platforms.
Which product has the best support
Support
OnDMARC's support consistently garners praise from its users. We observed that their team is highly responsive, knowledgeable, and proactive, offering guidance throughout the DMARC implementation journey. Many reviews highlight regular check-ins with customer success managers and quick issue resolution.
The level of support, including dedicated account managers, phone support, and custom SLAs, improves with higher-tier plans. While email support is reliable across the board, some users mentioned that web chat response times can vary, suggesting email as a more consistent contact method for basic plans.
Information regarding Centera DMARC Compliance's support structure is not publicly available. This absence of detail makes it impossible to assess the quality, responsiveness, or channels of support offered to customers.
Organizations considering Centera would need to inquire directly about their support packages, including availability, response times, and types of assistance provided. Without this information, evaluating its support capabilities against industry standards is not feasible.
Who should use each product
Suitability
OnDMARC is highly suitable for organizations of all sizes, from SMBs to large enterprises, thanks to its tiered pricing and feature sets. The Express plan caters to smaller businesses or those just starting their DMARC journey, while Essentials and Premier offer advanced features crucial for growing and large organizations needing robust email security.
MSPs would find OnDMARC particularly useful due to its multi-domain management capabilities and user permissioning features in higher tiers, allowing them to manage numerous client domains effectively. It is a strong choice for those prioritizing comprehensive protection and guided implementation.
Given the lack of public information, Centera DMARC Compliance's suitability is difficult to determine precisely. We would hypothesize it might appeal to SMBs or organizations with very basic DMARC needs, provided its pricing is competitive and its core functionality is robust.
However, without details on scalability, multi-tenancy, or advanced security features, it is less likely to be a primary choice for enterprise-level organizations or MSPs requiring extensive management capabilities and a high degree of transparency. It might suit those who prefer a less feature-rich, potentially simpler solution, assuming it exists.
How does OnDMARC compare with Centera DMARC Compliance?
DMARC report analysis
Ability to parse and present DMARC aggregate reports.
Assumed basic functionality
Source detection
Identify legitimate and illegitimate email sending sources.
Not verifiable, assumed limited
Forward detection
Recognize legitimate email forwarding that may impact DMARC.
Not verifiable, assumed limited
Spoof detection
Identify and alert on domain spoofing attempts.
Assumed core DMARC benefit
Notifications and alerts
Automated alerts for DMARC anomalies or policy changes.
Available in Essentials/Premier
No information
Reporting
Comprehensive dashboards and customizable reports.
Detailed, forensic reporting
No information on depth
API
Programmatic access for integration with other systems.
Available in Essentials/Premier
No information
Multi-tenancy
Manage multiple domains or client accounts from one interface.
User permissioning in Premier
No information
SPF flattening
Consolidate SPF records to bypass the 10-lookup limit.
Dynamic SPF feature
No information
Hosted DMARC
Platform hosts DMARC records for easier management.
Dynamic Services
No information
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Dynamic Services
No information
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security.
Dynamic Services
No information
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring email blocklists and sender reputation.
Radar, brand reputation monitoring
No information
AI copilot
AI-driven assistance for DMARC management.
Radar AI mentioned by users
No information
DNS monitoring
Monitor DNS records for changes and compliance.
DNS Guardian, DNS History
No information
Self hostable
Option to host the DMARC solution on private infrastructure.
SaaS product
SaaS product
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free trial or a permanently free service tier.
Free trial available
No information
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
OnDMARC is a robust platform, but some users report challenges with its GUI being clunky and the sheer volume of forensic reports. There are also mentions of limited customization for reporting and some initial overwhelm during setup. Conversely, Centera DMARC Compliance suffers from a significant lack of public information, making it impossible to identify specific drawbacks or strengths from a user perspective.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
4.9 / 5(94)
0 / 5(0)
Great for Managing Multiple DMAC Traces, Needs Auto-Triage for Forensic Reports
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?
Managing multiple DMARC traces has become much simpler. By enabling BIMI, we were able to significantly reduce our key risks with both customers and partners.
What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?
There is a need for automatic triaging of forensic reports, along with notifications if any anomalies are detected.
What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
BIMI helps our customers and partners recognize phishing scams more easily.
Verified User in Retail
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Dynamic SPF and Powerful Features, GUI Could Use Improvement
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?
I have been using Red Sift OnDMARC for over three years for monitoring DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across multiple domains, which would be difficult to manage without such a tool. It offers the ease of dynamic SPF and dynamic DMARC, which simplify complex monitoring tasks. The software provides a powerful set of features, making any initial setup challenges worthwhile. I especially value the single pane of glass interface as an IT administrator managing domains that engineers use, allowing me to track domain usage, detect spam issues, and dynamically update DMARC, DKIM, and SPF with ease. The dynamic SPF and DMARC/DKIM reports are integral for my operations, as they save considerable time by turning potentially lengthy tasks into several-minute jobs. Furthermore, the friendliness and support from our account manager, alongside our quarterly meetings, enhance the overall experience and decision to continue using the platform.
What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?
I find the GUI a little bit difficult to navigate sometimes and a bit clunky, which sometimes makes it hard to find what I want.
What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use the product to monitor DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across domains, simplifying updates and detecting spam issues with ease. It turns lengthy tasks into minutes, providing a comprehensive view of domain usage and security.
Brice P.
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC implementation with great visibility
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?
OnDMARC makes it very easy to set up and maintain DMARC records. The guided workflows and clear reporting helped us move from monitoring to full enforcement confidently. The user interface is intuitive, and support is very responsive whenever we have questions.
What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?
It would be helpful if some of the reporting dashboards allowed more customization or export options. Sometimes, the volume of daily reports can feel overwhelming without filtering.
What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is helping us prevent domain spoofing and phishing attacks by enforcing DMARC policies. It has also improved visibility into who is sending emails on behalf of our domain, so we can take quick action if needed. Overall, it has strengthened our email security posture and improved trust in our communications.
Shashi K.
SR Manager IT Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
It is quite a useful tool to manage SPF/DKIM/DMARC records and understand it's impact on the domain.
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?
The ease of using the application and the UI that is provides that helps in managing the records of the domain. Plus the customer service for the tool is quite responsive.
What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?
The limitation of the feature of MTA-STS, in which it reports only a few of the domains.
What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps us in getting a clearer picture of the use case of our domain, plus the acceptance and the rejection rate.
Ashman B.
CyberSecurity Analyst Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC setup
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?
We have had OnDMARC for several years, we onboarded all of our managed domains over the past 12months. It was very easy adding SPF, DKIM records and moving DMARC to 100% Reject. We had support from Red Sift all the way.
What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?
Sometimes the dashboard is misleading, i had moved a domain to reject 50% and the dashboard didn't reflect that. but customer support fixed that very quickly
What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
Securing our domains to bring them up to 100% Reject
Verified User in Law Practice
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Pricing
OnDMARC offers clear, tiered pricing starting with an Express plan for small organizations, whereas Centera DMARC Compliance does not provide any public pricing information, requiring direct contact for quotes.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
From $9/month (billed annually)
Contact for pricing
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
From $9/month (billed annually)
Contact for pricing
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
From $9/month (billed annually)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact sales
Contact for pricing
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with OnDMARC or Centera DMARC Compliance?