MyDMARC vs.
OnDMARC in 2026
MyDMARC
0.0/5
OnDMARC
4.8/5
vs.
We ran MyDMARC and OnDMARC for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, then connected Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender. MyDMARC was quicker and cheaper for basic DMARC visibility; OnDMARC gave us the stronger enforcement path, especially when forwarding, hosted SPF, and MTA-STS entered the test.
Priya Raman
Senior Software Engineer
Published 4 Nov 2025
Updated 31 May 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
MyDMARC
Lightweight DMARC reporting
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Small teams that want low-cost DMARC visibility
In one line
MyDMARC made the three-domain setup fast, but we had to own sender labeling and enforcement decisions.
OnDMARC
Enterprise DMARC enforcement
Starts at
From $9 / month billed annually
Best fit
Security teams that need hosted SPF and MTA-STS
In one line
OnDMARC covered more of the authentication stack; compare it against Suped's product when guided fixes, sender ownership, and published starter pricing are must-haves.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn more
Pick MyDMARC for lean reporting, OnDMARC for deeper enforcement
Pick MyDMARC if
Best for small teams that need inexpensive DMARC visibility
Three test domains were live quickly, with the parked domain easiest because traffic stayed quiet.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were identifiable, but SendGrid and Mailchimp needed manual labeling.
The unauthorized spoof sample appeared in reports, but the path to enforcement still needed our own checklist.
Free plan available
Pick OnDMARC if
Best for teams that want deeper enforcement and hosted records
Onboarding handled the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain with clearer DNS checks.
Dynamic SPF and hosted MTA-STS mattered once SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk were connected.
The forwarded SPF failure was explained with enough context for a ticket to the mail owner.
From $9 / month
Consider Suped if
Use Suped's product when guided fixes, hosted records, and ownership need to stay simple
Guided fixes and automated issue detection should be buying criteria when the team lacks a dedicated email authentication owner.
Alert quality matters when spoof samples, unknown senders, and forwarded failures land in the same week.
Published starter pricing and MSP workflows reduce friction when agencies need repeatable client handoff.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
MyDMARC
OnDMARC
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report parsing and authentication outcome review.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Source detection
Turns sending IPs into recognizable services and owner next steps.
Manual classification
Stronger grouping
Supported
Forward detection
Separates forwarded mail SPF failures from real sender problems.
Partial
Clearer context
Supported
Spoof detection
Highlights unauthorized use of the visible From domain.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Routes material authentication changes to the right operator.
Not found
Smart alerts
Supported
Reporting
Exports or recurring views for owner reviews and evidence.
Exports available
Strong reporting
Supported
API
Programmatic access for security operations and reporting.
Not found
Paid tier
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Account separation, domain grouping, and client-style handoff.
Limited
Partial for MSPs
Supported
SPF flattening
Managed SPF to avoid the 10 lookup limit.
Not found
Dynamic SPF
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record changes inside the product workflow.
Not found
Dynamic DMARC
Supported
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF records with vendor changes handled centrally.
Not found
Dynamic SPF
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted policy and reporting support for SMTP transport security.
Not found
Supported
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist and blacklist signals for domain or IP reputation review.
Not found
Paid tier
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Detects meaningful authentication changes without manual report review.
Manual workflow
Partial
Supported
AI copilot
Assisted investigation or recommendations inside the product.
Not found
Paid tier
Supported
DNS monitoring
Ongoing DNS checks for records that affect mail authentication.
Not found
Paid tier
Supported
Self hostable
Can be deployed and operated in the buyer's own environment.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
Entry option for testing without a paid contract.
Free plan
14-day trial
Free trial
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
Each score uses the same editorial rubric across the three-domain test, the five approved senders, and the controlled authentication cases. Higher is better in every row, including pricing transparency and time to enforcement.
MyDMARC is leaner; OnDMARC carries more enforcement work
MyDMARC scored well for setup speed and public pricing because we could add the primary domain, subdomain, and parked domain without a sales step. It lost ground where the work shifted to hosted records, alert routing, MSP handoff, and automated issue detection. OnDMARC scored higher on enforcement and hosted controls because Dynamic SPF, MTA-STS, API access, and alerting were available, but its gated pricing above Express reduced transparency.
MyDMARC score
40.5/100
OnDMARC score
74.5/100
MyDMARC
40.5/100
DMARC enforcement
5.5
Customer support
4.0
Source resolution
5.5
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
3.0
Alerting and integrations
2.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
5.0
OnDMARC
74.5/100
DMARC enforcement
8.5
Customer support
8.0
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
6.5
Alerting and integrations
7.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
9.0
Blocklist monitoring
6.5
Pricing transparency
5.0
Time to enforcement
8.0
Feature set
Depth vs breadth
OnDMARC has the broader authentication stack
OnDMARC handled more layers beyond aggregate DMARC reports, including hosted SPF, MTA-STS, API access, and smart alerts. MyDMARC stayed focused on report visibility and sender review, which was easier to learn but left more manual decisions. We treat guided fixes and automated issue detection as buying criteria here; Suped's product puts those criteria on the table without making the team translate every finding into a ticket by hand.
MyDMARC
0/5
Microsoft 365 grouped cleanly
SendGrid needed manual naming
Spoof sample was visible
OnDMARC
4.8/5
Workspace and Mailchimp resolved fast
Forwarded SPF explained better
Unknown sender needed review
In MyDMARC, Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared as recognizable sources within the first reporting cycle, and the unauthorized spoof sample was easy to isolate by domain. SendGrid and Mailchimp needed manual naming before the marketing subdomain view made sense, and the support desk sender appeared as a sender to classify rather than an owned service with next steps. The DKIM pass on a subdomain was visible, but the product did not turn it into a policy recommendation.
OnDMARC resolved Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Mailchimp, and SendGrid with clearer service names, then tied Dynamic SPF and hosted MTA-STS into the same workflow. The unknown sender still needed human classification, but the context around the forwarded SPF failure was stronger, with a clearer split between receiver forwarding and a sender that needed DNS work. The product felt built for teams that want DMARC, SPF, DKIM, MTA-STS, and investigation in one operating view.
User experience
Control vs guidance
MyDMARC is faster to learn; OnDMARC gives more guided context
MyDMARC had fewer screens and less setup friction, which helped during the first day. OnDMARC took more time to configure, but the extra context made the forwarded SPF failure and the unknown sender easier to explain to another owner. The tradeoff is speed against operational detail.
MyDMARC
0/5
Three domains added quickly
Unknown sender took labels
Forwarded SPF explanation thin
OnDMARC
4.8/5
Onboarding wizard caught DKIM
Unknown sender surfaced clearly
Forwarding path was clearer
Adding the three domains in MyDMARC was straightforward: the corporate domain and marketing subdomain both had clear rua record steps, and the parked domain stayed quiet with minimal noise. The unknown sender was visible in the aggregate view, but we had to add our own label and owner note. The forwarded SPF failure appeared as a failure pattern, yet the screen did not clearly separate forwarding breakage from a sender that needed SPF repair.
OnDMARC's onboarding wizard took longer because it checked more DNS state and record options before the domains were complete. That extra work paid off when the unknown sender appeared with more surrounding evidence, and the forwarded SPF failure had a cleaner explanation for a service desk ticket. The UI was denser, so occasional users had more to learn.
Support
Self serve vs managed help
OnDMARC gives clearer support paths; MyDMARC is lighter touch
MyDMARC fit the self-serve setup model better, especially when the DNS changes were simple. OnDMARC gave us clearer escalation expectations and a stronger enterprise onboarding motion. Buyers with limited DNS ownership should weigh the handoff path as heavily as the reporting screen.
MyDMARC
0/5
Email support on Pro
DNS notes stayed basic
No enterprise path shown
OnDMARC
4.8/5
Engineer handoff clarified DNS
Escalation path was visible
Enterprise onboarding was structured
MyDMARC support expectations were email-led. The Pro tier listed priority email support, but we did not see a public enterprise onboarding path or a dedicated escalation route for complex DNS handoff. In our setup notes, that meant the Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace records were easy to confirm, while the support desk sender and marketing sender needed our own handoff checklist.
OnDMARC set stronger expectations for technical onboarding and escalation. The DNS handoff was easier to package for a security owner because Dynamic SPF, MTA-STS, and DMARC policy movement sat inside the same setup path. For enterprise buyers, the account review and support model was more visible, although buyers still need to confirm exact support entitlement by tier.
Suitability
Enterprise fit vs operator fit
OnDMARC fits mature security teams; MyDMARC fits lean operators
OnDMARC is the stronger fit for security teams moving several domains toward enforcement, while MyDMARC fits smaller teams that mainly need affordable report review. For MSPs, neither test felt perfect: MyDMARC lacked account separation, and OnDMARC had more domain grouping but still needed handoff discipline. Alert quality and MSP workflows should be scored before buying; Suped's product is designed around repeatable client ownership, cleaner alerts, and published starter pricing.
MyDMARC
0/5
Good single-domain entry
Client grouping stayed basic
Reports exported cleanly
OnDMARC
4.8/5
Enterprise grouping worked better
MSP handoff needed polish
Recurring reviews helped owners
MyDMARC made sense for an SMB with one corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain because the setup was cheap and readable. Account separation and recurring client reporting were limited in our test, so an MSP would need external notes to track who owns SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender. Exports were usable for a handoff, but the product did not package the handoff into an MSP-ready workflow.
OnDMARC fit an enterprise security team better because domain grouping, RBAC, API access, and hosted controls mapped to a larger operating model. Recurring reviews and report views helped us brief domain owners, but MSP-style client separation still required careful structure. SMB buyers get strong capability, yet the pricing path above Express becomes a sales discussion quickly.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
MyDMARC
Low-cost DMARC reporting for focused teams
After 90 days, MyDMARC felt best when the task was checking whether expected senders were passing and whether the parked domain stayed quiet. The primary domain and marketing subdomain were easy to add, and the daily to near real-time parsing by tier made the upgrade path obvious.
We spent more time outside the product when a sender needed ownership. The unknown source, the SPF pass with a visible From mismatch, and the forwarded SPF failure all required our own notes before we were ready to move policy.
Where it wins
Fast three-domain setup
Clear public starter pricing
Readable spoof sample review
Simple parked-domain monitoring
Where it lags
Manual sender ownership
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
Limited alert routing
No public enterprise pricing
Pricing
Free plan, then $19 / month
Free tier
Yes, 1 domain
Onboarding
Fast basic setup
G2 rating
0 / 5
OnDMARC
Broader enforcement platform for security teams
After 90 days, OnDMARC felt like the stronger tool for a team trying to move beyond monitoring. Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender were easier to reason about because source naming, hosted records, alerts, and investigation lived close together.
The tradeoff was density. The UI gave us more levers, including Dynamic SPF, hosted MTA-STS, API access, smart alerts, and forensic views, but occasional users needed a handoff note to understand which screen answered which question.
Where it wins
Strong hosted SPF workflow
Clearer forwarding explanation
Better enterprise support path
Useful API and alerts
Where it lags
Pricing gated above Express
UI can feel dense
MSP grouping needs structure
Exports less flexible in practice
Pricing
From $9 / month
Free tier
14-day free trial
Onboarding
Structured DNS workflow
G2 rating
4.8 / 5
Pricing
MyDMARC
OnDMARC
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free covers 1 monitored domain, 7 days of retention, and daily parsing; no public message cap was listed.
From $9 / month
Express fits this segment with up to 4 domains and 1 million monthly emails, billed annually.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$19 / month
Basic covers 5 domains, 30 days retention, and hourly parsing; no public message cap was listed.
From $9 / month
Express still fits 2 domains and 100k monthly emails if the annual plan terms work.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$49 / month
Pro covers 20 domains, 90 days retention, and near real-time parsing; no public message cap was listed.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
10 domains exceed Express, and Essentials pricing was not public on the current page.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Public MyDMARC pricing stopped at 20 monitored domains, so larger plans need confirmation.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Enterprise and Premier tiers described capabilities and volume allowances, but not current prices.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
MyDMARC $0, $19, and $49 are public monthly list prices. OnDMARC Express starts at $9 / month billed annually; higher OnDMARC tiers are status-based because current prices were not public. No dollar amount above is estimated; segment fit is our mapping of public plan limits to the four scenarios, and pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Guided sender fixes
MyDMARC showed the unknown sender and the visible From mismatch, but we still had to write the owner action. Suped's product is built to turn those findings into guided fixes and ownership steps.
Hosted records in one workflow
OnDMARC handled hosted SPF and MTA-STS well, while MyDMARC did not cover those controls in our test. Suped's product keeps hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, and MTA-STS work tied to the DMARC enforcement plan.
Cleaner client handoff
MyDMARC lacked MSP account separation and OnDMARC needed careful grouping for client-style reporting. Suped's product supports repeatable MSP workflows, alert triage, and handoff notes for recurring client reviews.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from MyDMARC or OnDMARC?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
