Suped

Merox vs DMARC Visualizer

Choose Merox for a managed SaaS solution, choose DMARC Visualizer for an open-source, self-hosted option.
DMARC Visualizer
Compare to Suped
Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Merox offers a robust suite of features designed for comprehensive DMARC monitoring and enforcement. It provides detailed aggregate and forensic reports, allowing users to quickly identify and troubleshoot email authentication issues. The platform excels at visualising complex DMARC data, making it accessible even for those new to email security.
Beyond core reporting, Merox includes proactive alert systems, domain health checks, and tools to help achieve DMARC enforcement. We found its ability to categorise sending sources and detect potential spoofing attempts to be particularly effective, offering a clear path to improving email deliverability and security.
DMARC Visualizer, as an open-source project, provides a powerful foundation for DMARC reporting by leveraging tools like parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana. It allows for in-depth analysis of DMARC XML reports, offering granular control over how data is processed and presented.
While requiring a self-hosted setup, the flexibility of DMARC Visualizer means users can tailor their dashboards and alerts to their precise needs. It's an excellent choice for organisations that prefer to manage their own infrastructure and have the technical resources to configure and maintain a custom reporting solution.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Merox delivers a polished, intuitive user interface that makes navigating DMARC data straightforward. The dashboard is well-organised, presenting key metrics and visualisations upfront. Setting up new domains and configuring DMARC records feels guided, reducing the learning curve for administrators.
We appreciated the clear segmentation of data, allowing us to drill down into specific sending sources, authentication results, and policy actions without feeling overwhelmed. The overall experience is one of efficiency, making daily DMARC management a less daunting task.
DMARC Visualizer offers a user experience that is inherently different, given its self-hosted, open-source nature. While the Grafana dashboards, once configured, are highly customisable and can be very powerful, the initial setup process requires significant technical expertise in server administration, Docker, Elasticsearch, and Grafana.
For those comfortable with these technologies, the customisation possibilities are endless, allowing for dashboards tailored exactly to an organisation's unique requirements. However, users seeking a plug-and-play solution might find the setup and ongoing maintenance a considerable hurdle, requiring a steep learning curve to achieve a smooth workflow.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Merox provides dedicated customer support channels, typically including email, in-app chat, and a knowledge base. As a commercial SaaS platform, we expect prompt responses and expert assistance for any DMARC-related queries or platform issues. This level of professional support is crucial for businesses that rely on uninterrupted email flow and security.
Their documentation is comprehensive, guiding users through setup, troubleshooting, and advanced features. The availability of direct support means that even complex DMARC challenges can be addressed with vendor expertise, offering peace of mind to administrators.
Support for DMARC Visualizer primarily comes from the open-source community via its GitHub repository. This means troubleshooting and feature requests are handled through community forums, issues, and pull requests. While the community can be very helpful, it is not a direct, guaranteed support channel like a commercial vendor would offer.
Users should be prepared to be self-sufficient, relying on their own technical skills or the contributions of other users. For organisations that need immediate, guaranteed assistance, this community-driven model might pose a challenge, though it fosters a collaborative environment for development and problem-solving.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Merox is best suited for organisations looking for a managed, user-friendly DMARC reporting and enforcement solution without the overhead of self-hosting. This includes:
SMBs: Who need clear DMARC insights but may not have dedicated email security teams.
Enterprise: Seeking a reliable platform with comprehensive features, scalable reporting, and vendor support.
MSPs: Who manage DMARC for multiple clients and benefit from a multi-tenant, intuitive interface to streamline operations.
DMARC Visualizer is ideal for technically proficient users and organisations that prefer an open-source, self-hosted approach. This includes:
Organisations with strong IT departments: Who have the resources and expertise to deploy and maintain complex systems.
Users who require extreme customisation: The flexibility of Grafana allows for highly tailored dashboards and reporting.
MSPs: Who are comfortable with open-source tools and can integrate DMARC Visualizer into their existing infrastructure to offer highly customised solutions to their clients.

How does Merox compare with DMARC Visualizer?

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When evaluating these platforms, we noted a few key areas for consideration. Merox, as a commercial SaaS, generally offers a more streamlined experience, but it comes with a recurring cost that scales with usage. DMARC Visualizer, being open-source, is 'free' in terms of licensing, but demands significant technical effort and infrastructure costs for deployment and maintenance. The self-hosted nature means you are responsible for security, updates, and troubleshooting.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
DMARC Visualizer

Pricing

Merox operates on a tiered subscription model, while DMARC Visualizer is an open-source tool with no direct licensing costs, though it incurs significant operational expenses.
Logo
DMARC Visualizer
Small
Lite tier
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Standard tier
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Pro tier
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Merox or DMARC Visualizer?
Logo
DMARC Visualizer
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Merox vs DMARC Visualizer DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped