What is the primary difference between InboxMonster and Parseddmarc?

InboxMonster is a comprehensive, paid SaaS platform for email deliverability, creative testing, and DMARC reporting with dedicated support. Parseddmarc is a free, open-source Python tool for self-hosting DMARC report parsing, requiring technical expertise for setup and integration.

Which product is better for small businesses or individuals?

For small businesses or individuals, Parseddmarc could be an option if they possess strong technical skills and want a free, self-hosted parser. However, commercial DMARC reporting tools like Suped , with its generous free plan, often provide a more accessible and managed DMARC reporting solution without the complexity of self-hosting. InboxMonster's pricing typically targets larger organizations.

Does Parseddmarc offer a graphical user interface?

No, Parseddmarc is a command-line interface, CLI, utility. It processes DMARC reports and outputs data in formats like JSON or CSV, but it does not include a built-in graphical user interface or dashboard for visualization. Users need to integrate it with other tools, such as Elasticsearch or Splunk, to create a visual reporting interface.

How does support differ between the two DMARC solutions?

InboxMonster provides dedicated account managers and proactive, hands-on support, including assistance with email providers. Parseddmarc, being open-source, relies on community support through documentation and forums, requiring users to be more self-sufficient in troubleshooting and maintenance.

Can InboxMonster help with issues beyond DMARC, like inbox placement?

Yes, InboxMonster is a comprehensive email performance platform. While it includes DMARC reporting, its core strengths lie in broader email deliverability monitoring, inbox placement testing, spam trap detection, creative rendering, and sender reputation management. It aims to optimize the entire email lifecycle.

What are the hidden costs associated with using Parseddmarc?

While Parseddmarc itself is free open-source software, there are potential hidden costs related to infrastructure for self-hosting, such as server costs, cloud services, and storage for reports and databases. Additionally, labor costs for setup, ongoing maintenance, security, and integration with data visualization tools can be significant.

InboxMonster vs Parseddmarc

Choose InboxMonster for managed deliverability services, or Parseddmarc for a self-hosted open-source parser.

4.9 / 5(44)

Compare to Suped

Parseddmarc

0 / 5(0)

Compare to Suped

Parseddmarc

Compare product functionality

Feature set

Parseddmarc

InboxMonster positions itself as a comprehensive email performance platform, extending beyond DMARC to cover creative pre-send workflows, device rendering, and extensive deliverability monitoring. While DMARC is part of their offering, their strength lies in a holistic approach to email success, including inbox placement, spam trap monitoring, and reputation analysis. Their feature set indicates a focus on proactive management and detailed diagnostics across the entire email lifecycle.

The platform offers a broad range of tools for understanding email performance metrics. This includes deep dives into deliverability, real-time platform support, and shareable custom reporting. Their capabilities span from basic email authentication to advanced reputation management, providing insights into various aspects that influence email reaching the inbox. We found its feature set to be well-rounded for marketers and email teams.

Parseddmarc is an open-source Python package and command-line utility specifically designed for parsing DMARC reports. It's a foundational tool, focusing purely on processing aggregate (RUA) and forensic (RUF) reports, as well as SMTP TLS Reporting. Its functionality is precise: ingest reports from various sources like IMAP or Gmail API, and output them into structured formats such as JSON or CSV. This makes it a powerful backend component for DMARC data handling.

Being a self-hosted alternative, Parseddmarc's feature set is centered around raw data processing and integration. It doesn't offer a ready-to-use dashboard or a fancy UI out of the box, but rather provides the engine to build one. It supports sending processed data to systems like Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, Splunk, or Apache Kafka, which then require additional setup for visualization and alerting. Its strength is in its customizability and control over your DMARC data.

Parseddmarc

How easy is each product to use

User experience

Parseddmarc

Our experience with InboxMonster's user interface suggests a platform built for professional marketers and deliverability specialists. The dashboard is intuitive, presenting key metrics and insights in an accessible manner, though some users might find the sheer volume of data initially overwhelming. However, the platform is designed to distill complex email performance data into actionable insights, making it a powerful tool once familiarized with its layout.

The onboarding process is often described as 'white glove', indicating a guided setup experience, which helps new users navigate its extensive features. While there might be a slight learning curve due to the depth of its offerings, the overall user journey is supported by clear reporting and a focus on understanding deliverability. We found it efficient for daily monitoring and troubleshooting.

The user experience with Parseddmarc is fundamentally different, as it is a command-line interface, CLI, tool. This means there's no graphical user interface, GUI, in the traditional sense. Users interact with it via scripts and terminal commands, making it ideal for developers, system administrators, or teams with strong technical capabilities. For those accustomed to GUIs, the learning curve will be steep, requiring comfort with Python and command-line operations.

Setting up Parseddmarc involves configuring IMAP or API access, running scripts, and potentially integrating with external data visualization tools like Elasticsearch. The 'experience' is more about hands-on coding and system integration rather than dashboard navigation. Its benefit lies in the complete control and automation possibilities it offers, but it's certainly not a plug-and-play solution for non-technical users.

Parseddmarc

Which product has the best support

Support

Parseddmarc

InboxMonster consistently receives high praise for its customer support, often highlighted as a significant differentiator. Many reviews mention dedicated account managers and proactive support that provides actionable insights and helps remediate issues quickly. This hands-on, consultative approach is a strong suit, providing extensive guidance on improving deliverability and sender reputation. We experienced responsive and knowledgeable assistance.

Their support extends beyond just platform usage, often involving direct engagement with email providers to troubleshoot and address inboxing issues. This level of service is particularly valuable for complex deliverability challenges, saving teams considerable time. The 'white glove' setup also signals a strong commitment to client success from the outset.

As an open-source project, Parseddmarc's support model is community-driven. Users primarily rely on documentation, GitHub issues, and community forums for assistance. While the project is well-documented and maintained, direct one-on-one support from the developers isn't typically part of the offering. This model suits users who are self-sufficient and comfortable troubleshooting technical issues or contributing to the project themselves.

For businesses needing commercial-grade support, this open-source model may present challenges. There's no dedicated account manager or proactive outreach. Users are responsible for their own implementation, maintenance, and problem-solving, though the open-source community can often provide valuable peer support. Organizations seeking managed support would need to look for third-party service providers or commercial DMARC tools.

Parseddmarc

Who should use each product

Suitability

Parseddmarc

InboxMonster is best suited for businesses that prioritize comprehensive email deliverability, content rendering, and proactive reputation management.

For **MSPs**, it offers robust monitoring and reporting, allowing them to manage multiple client programs effectively with dedicated support. **Enterprise** clients benefit from its extensive features, scalability, and the consultative approach that helps navigate complex email ecosystems and maintain high sender reputation across large volumes. **SMBs** with significant email marketing efforts can also find value, particularly if they need hands-on support to improve deliverability, though the pricing may be a consideration. The platform excels for organizations that require deep insights into inbox placement, spam trap detection, and the ability to troubleshoot issues with expert guidance. It's designed for teams looking for a partner in their email success, particularly those who may not have in-house deliverability specialists or want to augment their existing team's capabilities.

Parseddmarc caters to a very specific technical audience and use case.

**MSPs** or large enterprises with robust DevOps teams could leverage Parseddmarc to build highly customized DMARC monitoring solutions in-house, assuming they have the resources for integration and maintenance. For **Enterprise** companies with strict data sovereignty requirements or those already heavily invested in their own data analytics infrastructure, like Elasticsearch or Splunk, Parseddmarc provides the raw data processing engine without vendor lock-in. **SMBs** would likely find Parseddmarc too complex and resource-intensive, as it requires significant technical expertise for setup, configuration, and ongoing management. It's ideal for organizations that prefer a self-hosted, open-source approach to DMARC data, allowing for maximum control and customization. It's not a ready-to-use DMARC reporting solution but rather a component that enables a technical team to build their own. Organizations that value flexibility and complete ownership of their data processing pipeline will find it suitable.

Parseddmarc

How does InboxMonster compare with Parseddmarc?

Parseddmarc

DMARC report analysis

Ability to process and interpret DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.

Source detection

Identifies sending sources based on DMARC data.

Forward detection

Detects forwarded email traffic and its impact on DMARC.

Spoof detection

Identifies email spoofing attempts.

Notifications and alerts

System for automated alerts on DMARC compliance issues or threats.

Requires integration with external tools for this functionality.

Reporting

Provides dashboards and custom reports for DMARC data visualization.

Comprehensive dashboards and custom reports.

Outputs raw data, needs external tools for user-friendly reports.

API

Offers an API for programmatic interaction and data export.

As a CLI tool, it offers programmatic integration.

Multi-tenancy

Supports managing multiple clients or domains within a single account.

Requires custom implementation to manage multiple clients.

SPF flattening

A feature to simplify SPF records to avoid lookup limits.

Hosted DMARC

Provides hosting of your DMARC record.

BIMI

Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification, BIMI.

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Support for MTA-STS and TLS reporting protocols.

Explicitly parses SMTP TLS Reporting data.

Blocklists and reputation

Monitoring of blocklists (or blacklists) and sender reputation.

Extensive blocklist and reputation monitoring.

AI copilot

Utilizes AI for insights or automated assistance.

Mentions Apple & Gmail AI summaries.

DNS monitoring

Comprehensive monitoring of DNS records beyond DMARC.

Self hostable

Can be installed and run on private infrastructure.

Open-source software designed for self-hosting.

Free trial/free tier

Availability of a free version or trial period.

Starts at $3,000 yearly.

Free open-source software.

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

InboxMonster's primary drawback seems to be its cost, which is higher than many competitors, and the potential for a steep learning curve given its extensive feature set. Some users also noted occasional seed list data outages. Parseddmarc, being an open-source, self-hosted solution, requires significant technical expertise and infrastructure investment, lacks a graphical interface, and offers no commercial support, making it unsuitable for non-technical users or those seeking a ready-made solution.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

4.9 / 5(44)

Parseddmarc

0 / 5(0)

Josie + InboxMonster has helped our email team tremendously!

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about Inbox Monster? I'm newer to the email team that utilizes InboxMonster but from what I've gathered from my coworker who has worked with Josie and InboxMonster for over a year, Josie was instrumental in providing actionable insights to enhance deliverability. What do you dislike about Inbox Monster? We don't have a proper CRM tool to leverage so InboxMonster isn't as much a problem as the tool we're using for email. What problems is Inbox Monster solving and how is that benefiting you? At the beginning of the year, the team discussed solutions such as better domain/IP allocation, stricter demark policies, and monitoring iCloud; they also noted the impact of email frequency and rogue franchisees on complaint rates. Next steps included investigating unsubscribe inconsistencies, exploring click activity data, discussing IP address optimization, and a future demo of Inbox Monster's "Creative Projects" tool; Josie Garcia will also provide further ISP and deliverability information. Most recently, Josie shared SendGrid-specific recommendations, best practices, and provided platform training, including user management, notifications, campaign tagging, subscriber insights, and spam trap analysis.

Verified User in Maritime

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Great toolset and helpful account support

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about Inbox Monster? The toolset is very robust and they are consistently adding to the functionality. The account support has also been great and incredibly proactive. Thom is the best and always super helpful. What do you dislike about Inbox Monster? Right now, there is nothing currently that I do not like or appreciate about Inbox Monster. What problems is Inbox Monster solving and how is that benefiting you? Inbox Monster is helping us manage and get insight into deliverability problems when they arise. There is a great toolset that is built behind this management and the additional tools with respect to content rendering is super helpful.

Verified User in Publishing

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

Valuable Deliverability Insights

4.5 / 5

What do you like best about Inbox Monster? Inbox Monster provides a lot of valuable insights into how are email deliverability is across many different email service providers. What do you dislike about Inbox Monster? Inbox Monster has many features and data sets, but not all of the data feels immediately actionable and I don't understand what every feature does. What problems is Inbox Monster solving and how is that benefiting you? Before Inbox Monster, we couldn't see where our emails were landing or what seeds were having deliverability issues.

Verified User in Higher Education

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

A Game-Changer for Email Deliverability

4.5 / 5

What do you like best about Inbox Monster? Inbox Monster has been a life saver for our email program. We have worked with Josie for just under a year, but the amount of dedication and support she provided to analyze our deliverability, help us come up with an action plan to remediate our poor deliverability and sender reputation, and ongoing monitoring of trends after working through our issues, has played a significant role in the health and success of our email marketing. Josie is always quick to respond and will walk through the issues with us, giving us valuable insights and recommendations along the way. My team does not have a strong background in deliverability, but Josie and the Inbox Monster team, has made a very technical part of email marketing very easy to understand and action against, allowing us to grow our skillset while also educating the rest of the company on deliverability best practices to ensure we do not fall into the same mess that we worked so hard to pull ourselves out of. In October 2024, we found out, with the help of Inbox Monster, that our inbox rate with Gmail was at 1% with low sender reputation. After working with Josie, we were able to increase and maintain our Gmail inbox rate to 95-100% with high sender reputation within 4 months. I cannot recommend Inbox Monster enough. What do you dislike about Inbox Monster? Email deliverability is overwhelming. This is not an Inbox Monster issue. The team at Inbox Monster is incredibly knowledgeable and gives so much information. A lot of the time, the analysis is easy to follow while meeting with the Inbox Monster team, but the amount of numbers and tabs within the platform make it a little difficult to follow on our own. We have a wonderful support team who are willing to meet at our cadence to discuss, but it's a bit difficult to do our own analysis outside of those meetings. What problems is Inbox Monster solving and how is that benefiting you? Inbox Monster helps provide valuable insight to our email deliverability and sender reputation.

Verified User in Health, Wellness and Fitness

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

Great tool with excellent consulting support

4.5 / 5

What do you like best about Inbox Monster? Clear reporting to understand our deliverability/inboxing, as well as domain/IP reputation factors. And the consulting services offered save us a ton of time, as they leverage existing relationships with email providers to troubleshoot/address inboxing issues. Super easy to use and onboard as well. What do you dislike about Inbox Monster? Everything is worth it, but the tool costs more than other deliverability platforms, however, that's largely because they are taking on the work of coordinating with email providers What problems is Inbox Monster solving and how is that benefiting you? They offer a one-stop shop of crucial information to understand our sending domain/ip health, and most importantly, offer services that help us work with email providers quickly and effectively. This saves our team a ton of time we would otherwise have to spend coordinating with each ESP

Brandon G.

Senior Manager, Marketing Operations Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

Pricing

InboxMonster offers high-tier annual plans with white-glove setup, starting at $3,000 yearly, while Parseddmarc is free open-source software with costs only for self-hosting infrastructure.

Parseddmarc

Small

Up to 10k emails / month

Contact for pricing

Free (infrastructure costs apply)

Medium

Up to 100k emails / month

Contact for pricing

Free (infrastructure costs apply)

Large

Up to 1 million emails / month

Contact for pricing