Suped

InboxMonster vs ELK DMARC

Choose InboxMonster for enterprise-grade deliverability and support, or ELK DMARC for a self-hosted, open-source solution.
LogoCompare to Suped
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
InboxMonster provides a comprehensive suite for email and SMS performance, moving beyond just DMARC. It offers advanced pre-send workflows, device rendering, and robust monitoring for spam traps and blocklists (or blacklists). We found it to be an all-encompassing platform for overall email health.
Its strength lies in its ability to deeply analyze every facet of an email program, including creative proofing and reputation analysis. While it handles DMARC, it integrates this with a broader set of tools designed for sophisticated email marketers who need a granular view of their entire sending ecosystem.
ELK DMARC is an open-source, self-hosted DMARC reporting tool built on the ELK stack, which comprises Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Its primary function is to aggregate and visualize DMARC XML reports, helping users understand their DMARC compliance status.
We observed that its feature set is strictly limited to core DMARC functionality. While it delivers essential DMARC insights, users will need to integrate additional tools or develop custom solutions for broader email deliverability monitoring and management, as it doesn't extend to areas like creative analysis or general reputation tracking.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
InboxMonster features a clean and generally intuitive user interface. However, given its extensive array of features, new users may experience a learning curve. The vendor often provides a 'white glove set up' to facilitate a smoother onboarding process.
We found its dashboards to be highly detailed, offering a wealth of information. While this can initially feel overwhelming, users typically grow to appreciate the depth of insights available once they become more familiar with the platform.
As a self-hosted, open-source solution, the user experience for ELK DMARC is heavily dependent on the user's technical proficiency. It requires manual deployment and configuration of the ELK stack and Docker environments, which demands significant IT expertise.
The interface, primarily driven by Kibana dashboards, is highly customizable. However, to effectively visualize and analyze DMARC data, a solid understanding of Kibana is essential. This means the experience is geared towards technical users comfortable with infrastructure management.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
InboxMonster is widely recognized for its excellent, proactive, and hands-on customer support, often described by users as a true 'partnership'. Many client reviews highlight the availability of dedicated consultants who provide actionable insights and actively troubleshoot issues.
We noted that these consultants frequently coordinate directly with email providers on behalf of clients. Real-time platform support and optional professional services packages are core to their offering, making it an ideal choice for teams seeking high-touch assistance.
Being an open-source project, ELK DMARC's support primarily comes from its community. This includes forums, GitHub issues, and the user's own internal technical team. There is no commercial support or dedicated customer service team.
Users must possess the in-house expertise to manage, troubleshoot, and update the system themselves. Reliance on community contributions for solutions to problems is necessary, which might not be suitable for organizations requiring immediate, guaranteed assistance.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
InboxMonster is highly suitable for MSPs due to its implied multi-tenancy capabilities and comprehensive reporting, enabling efficient DMARC and deliverability management for numerous clients. For enterprise-level organizations, its robust feature set, dedicated support, and ability to handle high volumes make it a very strong choice, especially where email performance directly impacts revenue.
Conversely, for SMBs (small to medium businesses), InboxMonster is generally less suitable. Its high price point and extensive feature set may be overkill for organizations with simpler email needs or limited budgets, potentially leading to underutilized functionality.
ELK DMARC is less suitable for MSPs seeking an out-of-the-box solution with commercial support. However, MSPs with strong technical teams could customize and host it for clients, albeit with significant development and maintenance investment. For enterprises, it can be suitable if they have robust internal IT teams and prefer open-source, self-hosted solutions for maximum data control and customization.
For SMBs, ELK DMARC is largely impractical. The substantial technical overhead, including the requirement for a minimum of 8GB RAM for Elasticsearch, and the lack of commercial support make it challenging for smaller businesses without dedicated IT operations to deploy and maintain effectively.

How does InboxMonster compare with ELK DMARC?

Logo
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

The primary drawback of InboxMonster is its significant cost, which places it out of reach for many smaller organizations. While feature-rich, the sheer volume of data can be overwhelming without consistent engagement with their support team. We also noted occasional mentions of seed list data outages and the additional cost for certain tools, which can add up. For ELK DMARC, the main challenge is its high technical barrier to entry. Being a self-hosted solution, it demands considerable IT expertise and resources for deployment and ongoing management. Its feature set is narrowly focused on DMARC, limiting its utility for broader email deliverability issues, and it lacks any form of commercial support.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
ELK DMARC
Josie + InboxMonster has helped our email team tremendously!
I'm newer to the email team that utilizes InboxMonster but from what I've gathered from my coworker who has worked with Josie and InboxMonster for over a year, Josie was instrumental in providing actionable insights to enhance deliverability. We don't have a proper CRM tool to leverage so InboxMonster isn't as much a problem as the tool we're using for email. At the beginning of the year, the team discussed solutions such as better domain/IP allocation, stricter demark policies, and monitoring iCloud; they also noted the impact of email frequency and rogue franchisees on complaint rates. Next steps included investigating unsubscribe inconsistencies, exploring click activity data, discussing IP address optimization, and a future demo of Inbox Monster's "Creative Projects" tool; Josie Garcia will also provide further ISP and deliverability information. Most recently, Josie shared SendGrid-specific recommendations, best practices, and provided platform training, including user management, notifications, campaign tagging, subscriber insights, and spam trap analysis.
Verified User in Maritime
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Great toolset and helpful account support
The toolset is very robust and they are consistently adding to the functionality. The account support has also been great and incredibly proactive. Thom is the best and always super helpful. Right now, there is nothing currently that I do not like or appreciate about Inbox Monster. Inbox Monster is helping us manage and get insight into deliverability problems when they arise. There is a great toolset that is built behind this management and the additional tools with respect to content rendering is super helpful.
Verified User in Publishing
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Valuable Deliverability Insights
Inbox Monster provides a lot of valuable insights into how are email deliverability is across many different email service providers. Inbox Monster has many features and data sets, but not all of the data feels immediately actionable and I don't understand what every feature does. Before Inbox Monster, we couldn't see where our emails were landing or what seeds were having deliverability issues.
Verified User in Higher Education
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
A Game-Changer for Email Deliverability
Inbox Monster has been a life saver for our email program. We have worked with Josie for just under a year, but the amount of dedication and support she provided to analyze our deliverability, help us come up with an action plan to remediate our poor deliverability and sender reputation, and ongoing monitoring of trends after working through our issues, has played a significant role in the health and success of our email marketing. Josie is always quick to respond and will walk through the issues with us, giving us valuable insights and recommendations along the way. My team does not have a strong background in deliverability, but Josie and the Inbox Monster team, has made a very technical part of email marketing very easy to understand and action against, allowing us to grow our skillset while also educating the rest of the company on deliverability best practices to ensure we do not fall into the same mess that we worked so hard to pull ourselves out of. In October 2024, we found out, with the help of Inbox Monster, that our inbox rate with Gmail was at 1% with low sender reputation. After working with Josie, we were able to increase and maintain our Gmail inbox rate to 95-100% with high sender reputation within 4 months. I cannot recommend Inbox Monster enough. Email deliverability is overwhelming. This is not an Inbox Monster issue. The team at Inbox Monster is incredibly knowledgeable and gives so much information. A lot of the time, the analysis is easy to follow while meeting with the Inbox Monster team, but the amount of numbers and tabs within the platform make it a little difficult to follow on our own. We have a wonderful support team who are willing to meet at our cadence to discuss, but it's a bit difficult to do our own analysis outside of those meetings. Inbox Monster helps provide valuable insight to our email deliverability and sender reputation.
Verified User in Health, Wellness and Fitness
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Great tool with excellent consulting support
Clear reporting to understand our deliverability/inboxing, as well as domain/IP reputation factors. And the consulting services offered save us a ton of time, as they leverage existing relationships with email providers to troubleshoot/address inboxing issues. Super easy to use and onboard as well. Everything is worth it, but the tool costs more than other deliverability platforms, however, that's largely because they are taking on the work of coordinating with email providers They offer a one-stop shop of crucial information to understand our sending domain/ip health, and most importantly, offer services that help us work with email providers quickly and effectively. This saves our team a ton of time we would otherwise have to spend coordinating with each ESP
Brandon G.
Senior Manager, Marketing Operations Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

Pricing

InboxMonster presents itself as a premium, comprehensive SaaS solution with significant annual costs, whereas ELK DMARC is an open-source offering, effectively free for the software itself but requiring investment in self-hosting infrastructure and IT expertise.
Logo
ELK DMARC
Small
From $15,000 yearly (Deliverability Suite)
Hosting costs for 8GB RAM minimum
Medium
Contact for pricing
Hosting costs scale with data
Large
Contact for pricing
Hosting costs scale with data
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Hosting costs scale with data

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with InboxMonster or ELK DMARC?
Logo
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions