Suped

Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark vs Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer

Choose Postmark for simple, free weekly digests; choose Techsneeze for complete control and self-hosting.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark focuses on simplicity. It provides a straightforward DMARC monitoring service that gives us a weekly digest of our DMARC reports. This means we get a snapshot of our email authentication status without needing to log into a dashboard.
The visibility into mail sources is limited to the top 10 with 5 IPs per source, which is sufficient for basic monitoring but leaves us wanting more detail if we're debugging complex issues or managing a large number of sending systems.
Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer, being a self-hosted solution, offers us complete control over our DMARC reporting. We download and run the software on our own infrastructure, giving us full access to all raw DMARC aggregate XML reports without any artificial limitations.
This level of control means we can store as much historical data as our server allows and parse every single detail from every sending source. The features are essentially limitless, bounded only by our technical expertise and resources to configure and extend the open-source code.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
The user experience with Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark is incredibly hands-off. Once we set up the DMARC record to point to Postmark's reporting address, we simply wait for the weekly email. There's no web dashboard to navigate, which simplifies the process for those who prefer email-based updates.
This simplicity also means a lack of interactive features. We can't filter data, click through to see specific reports, or get on-demand insights. It's a 'set it and forget it' approach, ideal if our requirements are minimal and we only need basic oversight.
Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer offers a more involved user experience, as it requires self-hosting. This means we are responsible for setting up and maintaining the server environment, including PHP, a web server, and a database. Installation can be complex for those without significant technical expertise.
Once configured, the viewer provides a web-based interface where we can see aggregated DMARC data. However, the interface might feel basic compared to commercial DMARC tools. Its power lies in its raw data access and customizability, not in polished dashboards or intuitive visualisations out-of-the-box.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
With Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark, the support experience is tied to Postmark's broader customer service. While the free tier might have limited dedicated support, Postmark generally has a reputation for responsive and knowledgeable assistance, particularly around email deliverability.
For a free product, the level of support we receive is commendable, typically via email. However, given the product's simplicity, complex DMARC configuration or deliverability issues requiring deep dives are usually beyond the scope of this free offering and might prompt an upgrade to a paid Postmark product or a dedicated DMARC service.
Support for Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is community-driven, typical of open-source projects. This means there's no official support channel or dedicated team to assist us. We rely on documentation, forums, or our own technical skills to troubleshoot issues and implement new features.
While community support can be robust, it lacks guaranteed response times and expertise. For critical issues or complex setups, we need to have strong internal IT resources or be prepared to hire external consultants who are familiar with the tool and DMARC protocols.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark is best suited for small businesses (SMBs) or individuals managing a single domain who require basic DMARC oversight without a dedicated budget. It's an excellent entry point for understanding DMARC reports without the complexity of a full platform.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs) and enterprises, this free product offers insufficient detail and lacks multi-tenancy or a centralized dashboard. It's not designed for the scale or granular insights these larger entities typically require to manage multiple clients or extensive email infrastructure.
Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is ideal for technically proficient SMBs, MSPs, or even enterprises that have the internal resources and expertise to self-host and manage an open-source solution. It provides complete data control, which is crucial for organizations with strict data privacy requirements or complex integrations.
MSPs could potentially white-label and customize this tool for their clients, provided they invest in its development and maintenance. For enterprises, it offers the flexibility to integrate DMARC reporting deeply into existing security or IT operations, but it demands a significant initial and ongoing investment in technical resources.

How does Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark compare with Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

While Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark offers a convenient, hands-off approach, its limited data visibility and lack of a dashboard can be a drawback for more proactive users. We found ourselves wishing for more granular control and on-demand insights. Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer, conversely, provides immense control but comes with the significant overhead of self-hosting and managing an open-source tool, potentially lacking the polish and dedicated support of a commercial offering. Its greatest strength is also its greatest challenge, requiring substantial technical investment from our side.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Not the best
What do you like best about ActiveCampaign Postmark? It works. Their API is easy-to-use and we never experienced any downtime. What do you dislike about ActiveCampaign Postmark? The price is too high for what we get. Also their administration panel and Analytics graphs are not user friendly. Recommendations to others considering ActiveCampaign Postmark: Check Mandrill as alternative. What problems is ActiveCampaign Postmark solving and how is that benefiting you? We use Postmark as secondary provider to send emails. We send ~100M emails per week.
Verified User in Online Media
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
A clean simple api
What do you like best about ActiveCampaign Postmark? Postmark has been simple and reliable in the 2+ years I've used them. Their API has a fast response time and their batch send calls has been helpful in maintaining a quick response time on our service. They've also been generous in giving us free credits from time to time. They provide webhooks for events you are interested in e.g. bounced emails, spam reports. Their documentation is extensive and comprehensive and also includes libraries for several languages (we use them with python and php). What do you dislike about ActiveCampaign Postmark? Some of the new features Postmark has added aren't as simple as their first product, especially the email templates. Their admin interface also is weird in that it only lets you look at 30 day periods for statistics (we track our own analytics so it's less of an issue for us). Recommendations to others considering ActiveCampaign Postmark: Postmark quickly and effectively help us getting transactional email up for our service. We've evaluated switching to Mailgun (since we get it for free) however right now postmark seems to have the simpler API. What problems is ActiveCampaign Postmark solving and how is that benefiting you? Postmark helped us quickly and effectively add an outside transactional email provider instead of sending SMTP emails. It's also helped ensure that our app stays quick when we were originally directly calling it from the application thread. We've had no problem with getting marked as spam or deliverability and their open tracking by email client has been helpful. We've sent 200,000+ emails with postmark so far.
John P.
Software Engineer II Financial Services Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
The Most Seamless & User-friendly Transactional Email delivery system for TruckX
What do you like best about ActiveCampaign Postmark? Email delivery and trust with our customers is our first priority at www.TruckX.com, so Postmark is our go-to for Email APIs because automated emails can be created and managed smoothly. What do you dislike about ActiveCampaign Postmark? Their analytics could be even more detailed in examining how the data performs. What problems is ActiveCampaign Postmark solving and how is that benefiting you? By ensuring that we deliver all www.TruckX.com ’s customer-facing transactional emails without delay, Postmark helps us ensure that our customers are happy and our operations are running smoothly. It has helped us become one of the best ELD brands for owner-operators and mid-sized fleets
Ramesh K.
Associate Product Manager Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Speed at a low price
What do you like best about ActiveCampaign Postmark? I really appreciate the speed with which I receive emails. It's very important to me that customers receive emails on time because otherwise we can miss out on some business. What do you dislike about ActiveCampaign Postmark? I don't like the fact that sometimes Mustachio, which is the language used to write emails, is a bit old-fashioned and I have to find other ways to do things that could be done in a more simple way. What problems is ActiveCampaign Postmark solving and how is that benefiting you? Postmark helps me send emails to my customers and retrieve data on email opens. This allows me to have complete control and visibility over the email communications sent.
Ange B.
software engineer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Definitely worth trying for your company - better than other options!
What do you like best about ActiveCampaign Postmark? Postmark is a really great service and gets the job done when delivering emails to our recipients. There are almost never any hiccups (i.e. emails getting blocked like some other delivery services). We're better able to provide website maintenance and hosting PLUS email delivery services, which is a great one-stop shop feature for clients. Some advice I would give to those on the fence is trying the free trial of Postmark to see if it's a good fit for your company. What do you dislike about ActiveCampaign Postmark? The price isn't as competitive as other options, which can sometimes be an issue dealing with clients. The training opportunities are also minimal if you don't know where to start, which can sometimes be an issue. The biggest dislike from a technical standpoint is there isn't an archiving option. Some clients like this feature when working with us, so that's one thing that can have us looking at other transactional email services. Recommendations to others considering ActiveCampaign Postmark: I would recommend the free trial to those considering Postmark. It's just slightly above average pricing, but is also a better option than the competitors, so overall I would recommend! What problems is ActiveCampaign Postmark solving and how is that benefiting you? We're able to use just Postmark in-house to manage transactional emails, which is a great benefit because when we need to look up something, we don't have to search through individual emails. If something were to go wrong, we can simply check with Postmark. As for our clients, we can use Postmark to deliver all the necessary emails almost always without fail, so this gives us credibility to get the job done when we say we can manage their email services.
Carney C.
Senior Web Designer Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

Pricing

The key difference in pricing is that Postmark offers a completely free, hosted solution for basic DMARC reports, while Techsneeze is open-source and free of license fees, but incurs self-hosting costs.
Logo
Logo
Small
Free
Free (self-hosting costs)
Medium
Free
Free (self-hosting costs)
Large
Free
Free (self-hosting costs)
Enterprise
Free
Free (self-hosting costs)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark or Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark vs Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped