Suped

Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark vs Palisade

Choose Postmark for basic free DMARC monitoring, or Palisade for comprehensive paid DMARC solutions.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark provides a foundational look into your domain's DMARC activity. It's designed to give you a quick overview without overwhelming you with granular data. We found that it focuses on essential insights, making it suitable for those just dipping their toes into DMARC monitoring.
The free service provides visibility into your top 10 mail sources, with up to 5 IP addresses for each, and a DMARC report history limited to 7 days. You receive weekly email digests with actionable recommendations, but there's no dedicated web dashboard or user management. It's a straightforward, set-and-forget solution for basic awareness.
Palisade, on the other hand, aims to offer a more comprehensive DMARC reporting and monitoring experience. While specific details on their exact features are not publicly detailed, we anticipate a full-fledged platform designed for in-depth analysis and management of your DMARC compliance.
We would expect Palisade to include features such as a dedicated dashboard for real-time data, full visibility into all mail sources and IPs, extensive report history, and advanced analytics for deeper insights into email delivery and potential threats. It's likely built for users who need to take proactive measures beyond basic monitoring.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
The user experience for Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark is incredibly simple, by design. Once you set up the DMARC record, you receive weekly email reports directly to your inbox. There's no dashboard to navigate, no complex filters to apply, and no logins to remember.
This hands-off approach makes it very easy to get started and maintain. It's perfect if you prefer receiving digestible summaries without the need for interactive tools. We found it a refreshingly minimal approach to DMARC monitoring.
We would expect Palisade to offer a more interactive and feature-rich user experience, likely through a dedicated web dashboard. This would provide users with tools to visualize DMARC data, drill down into specific reports, and manage their DMARC configuration.
While a more robust platform might have a steeper learning curve than a simple email digest, it typically offers greater control and analytical depth. We'd anticipate a user interface designed for detailed investigation and ongoing management of DMARC policies.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
For Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark, the support model is primarily self-service through the actionable recommendations provided in the email digests. Since this is a free, hands-off product, direct one-on-one support would not be its primary offering.
However, Postmark as a company is known for its excellent support for its transactional email service. While specific DMARC support for the free digest might be limited to documentation, we found their broader support resources for email deliverability generally helpful.
For a paid DMARC reporting solution like Palisade, we would anticipate a more comprehensive support structure. This typically includes various channels such as email support, knowledge bases, and potentially live chat or phone support, depending on the subscription level.
Effective support is crucial for DMARC, especially when dealing with complex enforcement issues or troubleshooting deliverability problems. We'd expect Palisade to provide dedicated assistance to help users understand their reports and implement necessary changes.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark is ideally suited for individuals or very small businesses (SMBs) who need a basic overview of their domain's DMARC status. It's excellent for personal domains or those just beginning their DMARC journey and who prefer simplicity over complexity.
It's not designed for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) or enterprise-level organizations that require deep analytics, real-time monitoring, multi-domain management, or comprehensive spoofing (or blocklisting) prevention. Its limitations on data retention and source visibility make it unsuitable for advanced DMARC policy enforcement.
Palisade would likely be a better fit for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) with more complex email ecosystems, larger organizations (enterprise), or Managed Service Providers (MSPs) who need detailed visibility and robust management tools. Its assumed feature set points towards a solution for active DMARC policy enforcement.
We would expect it to cater to users who need to actively monitor, analyze, and adjust their DMARC, SPF, and DKIM records across multiple domains. This type of product is typically necessary for businesses concerned with brand protection, phishing (or blocklist) prevention, and maintaining high email deliverability at scale.

How does Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark compare with Palisade?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering drawbacks, the Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark offers limited data visibility and no interactive dashboard, which can be a significant constraint for active DMARC management. Its 7-day report history and lack of user management also mean it's not scalable for teams or larger operations. For Palisade, with no public reviews or detailed information, the main drawback is the lack of transparency regarding its features, pricing, and user feedback, making it harder to assess potential issues before committing.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Not the best
What do you like best about ActiveCampaign Postmark? It works. Their API is easy-to-use and we never experienced any downtime. What do you dislike about ActiveCampaign Postmark? The price is too high for what we get. Also their administration panel and Analytics graphs are not user friendly. Recommendations to others considering ActiveCampaign Postmark: Check Mandrill as alternative. What problems is ActiveCampaign Postmark solving and how is that benefiting you? We use Postmark as secondary provider to send emails. We send ~100M emails per week.
Verified User in Online Media
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
A clean simple api
What do you like best about ActiveCampaign Postmark? Postmark has been simple and reliable in the 2+ years I've used them. Their API has a fast response time and their batch send calls has been helpful in maintaining a quick response time on our service. They've also been generous in giving us free credits from time to time. They provide webhooks for events you are interested in e.g. bounced emails, spam reports. Their documentation is extensive and comprehensive and also includes libraries for several languages (we use them with python and php). What do you dislike about ActiveCampaign Postmark? Some of the new features Postmark has added aren't as simple as their first product, especially the email templates. Their admin interface also is weird in that it only lets you look at 30 day periods for statistics (we track our own analytics so it's less of an issue for us). Recommendations to others considering ActiveCampaign Postmark: Postmark quickly and effectively help us getting transactional email up for our service. We've evaluated switching to Mailgun (since we get it for free) however right now postmark seems to have the simpler API. What problems is ActiveCampaign Postmark solving and how is that benefiting you? Postmark helped us quickly and effectively add an outside transactional email provider instead of sending SMTP emails. It's also helped ensure that our app stays quick when we were originally directly calling it from the application thread. We've had no problem with getting marked as spam or deliverability and their open tracking by email client has been helpful. We've sent 200,000+ emails with postmark so far.
John P.
Software Engineer II Financial Services Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

Pricing

Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark is, as the name suggests, completely free, whereas Palisade's pricing is not publicly available and would require direct contact.
Logo
Logo
Small
Free
Contact for pricing
Medium
Free
Contact for pricing
Large
Free
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Free
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark or Palisade?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions