Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark vs.
MyDMARC in 2026
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
4.6/5
MyDMARC
0.0/5
vs.
We tested Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark and MyDMARC for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. Postmark was useful when weekly email summaries were enough, while MyDMARC gave us a workable dashboard and more domain coverage without forcing an immediate paid jump. The tradeoff is blunt: Postmark is simpler, MyDMARC is more operational, and neither made enforcement ownership simple for a busy team.
Rhea Robinson
Senior Solutions Engineer
Published 4 Nov 2025
Updated 29 May 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Free weekly DMARC email summaries
Starts at
$0
Best fit
Personal domains and very small teams that want a lightweight weekly check
In one line
Postmark's free product gave us a weekly email view of top sources, but the email-only workflow left guided fixes, source ownership, edge-case diagnosis, and policy movement outside the product.
MyDMARC
Self-serve DMARC reporting dashboard
Starts at
$0
Best fit
SMBs that want a dashboard, multiple domains, and short-cycle report parsing
In one line
MyDMARC handled our three-domain setup with clearer drilldowns than an email digest, but it still required manual judgment for sender classification and enforcement planning.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn more
Pick Postmark for passive checks, MyDMARC for daily operation
Pick Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark if
Best for owners who only need a weekly pulse on one low-risk domain
The parked domain was easy to watch because the weekly email showed when almost no legitimate traffic appeared.
The primary domain digest showed Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace as expected senders, but we had to keep our own notes for ownership.
The unauthorized spoof sample was visible in the summary, yet the weekly cadence made it poor for time-sensitive response.
Free plan available
Pick MyDMARC if
Best for SMBs that want a dashboard for several domains
The three test domains fit cleanly into the public paid tiers, with daily, hourly, or near real-time parsing depending on plan.
SendGrid and Mailchimp drilldowns were easier to compare against Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace than in a weekly email.
The unknown sender was easier to isolate, although we still had to decide whether it was a vendor, a forwarder, or abuse.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Choose Suped when guided fixes, hosted records, and ownership clarity matter
Suped's product fits teams that want sending source identification tied to clear next steps instead of a separate investigation queue.
Automated issue detection and higher-quality alerts help distinguish a forwarded SPF failure from a spoofing event before policy changes.
Published starter pricing gives buyers a clearer budget path when they need guided fixes, MSP workflows, and recurring review habits.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
MyDMARC
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Turns aggregate reports into a readable view of pass, fail, and domain-match results.
Reporting only, weekly email
Dashboard with retention by tier
Dashboard analysis
Source detection
Identifies services behind DMARC traffic and separates legitimate senders from unknown traffic.
Top sources only
Manual workflow with clearer drilldowns
Source identification
Forward detection
Helps explain cases where SPF fails because mail was forwarded.
Unclear in digest
Partial, needs review
Forward-aware investigation
Spoof detection
Separates unauthorized traffic from approved senders with broken authentication.
Visible in weekly summary
Dashboard drilldown
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Sends operational warnings when authentication or source patterns change.
Weekly email only
Basic alerting
Alert rules and routing
Reporting
Produces recurring views for stakeholders or client handoff.
Weekly digest
Dashboard reporting
Recurring reports
API
Provides programmatic access for report metadata, integrations, or operational workflows.
Limited report metadata
Not published
API available
Multi-tenancy
Supports separating domains, clients, or account groups.
Manual account separation
Domain grouping, not MSP-first
MSP workflows
SPF flattening
Manages SPF lookup limits through a hosted or flattened record workflow.
Not supported
Not published
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Hosts or manages the DMARC record after DNS setup.
Not supported
Not published
Supported
Hosted SPF
Hosts or manages SPF records to reduce DNS maintenance.
Not supported
Not published
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Manages MTA-STS policy hosting and related TLS reporting workflow.
Not supported
Not published
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Checks blocklist and blacklist signals that can affect delivery reputation.
Not supported
Not published
Blocklist monitoring
Automatic issue detection
Flags likely misconfigurations or new failures without requiring manual review first.
Manual workflow
Partial
Automated issue detection
AI copilot
Provides guided interpretation or assisted troubleshooting for DMARC findings.
Not supported
Not published
AI assistance
DNS monitoring
Tracks DNS record changes and configuration drift.
Not supported
Not published
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Can be deployed and operated on your own infrastructure.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
Has a no-cost way to start testing with real DMARC reports.
Free tier
Free tier
Free tier
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against a fixed editorial rubric built around DMARC enforcement readiness, source resolution, setup, alerting, hosted record support, blocklist and blacklist monitoring, pricing clarity, and time to a defensible policy plan. Higher is better in every row, and a score of 0.0 means the capability was not supported or not published in a way we could test.
MyDMARC scored higher for daily DMARC operations, while Postmark stayed useful for passive monitoring.
Postmark's free weekly emails helped us confirm known senders, but the limited source list, seven-day history, and lack of a dashboard made enforcement planning slow. MyDMARC gave us a better working surface for the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain, especially when comparing Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp. Neither product gave us hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, DNS monitoring, or blocklist monitoring in the tested workflow.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark score
30.5/100
MyDMARC score
46/100
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
30.5/100
DMARC enforcement
3.0
Customer support
4.0
Source resolution
3.0
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
1.0
Alerting and integrations
2.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
2.5
MyDMARC
46/100
DMARC enforcement
6.0
Customer support
5.0
Source resolution
6.5
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
4.0
Alerting and integrations
4.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
6.0
Feature set
Reporting depth
MyDMARC gives more working depth; Postmark gives a lighter weekly signal.
The feature gap showed up once we added Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender. Buyers should treat guided fixes and automated issue detection as separate requirements, because a report that says something failed still leaves work to classify the sender and decide the next DNS change.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
4.6/5
Microsoft 365 recognized
Weekly source summaries
Subdomain DKIM needs notes
MyDMARC
0/5
SendGrid Mailchimp drilldowns
Unknown sender surfaced
Forwarded SPF clearer
Postmark's free weekly digest gave us a concise view of the top senders. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were recognizable on the corporate domain, and the parked domain stayed quiet enough that the weekly email was easy to read. The limits appeared when we tested SPF pass with a visible from mismatch and DKIM pass on a subdomain: the digest showed authentication facts, but not enough context to move an owner toward a policy decision without separate notes.
MyDMARC had the broader working feature set for our test. We could compare SendGrid and Mailchimp on the marketing subdomain, isolate the unknown sender faster, and review the forwarded mail SPF failure with more context than a weekly email provided. The product still leaned on manual classification, especially when deciding whether a sender was a support desk flow, a forwarder, or an unauthorized source.
User experience
Email vs dashboard
Postmark is easier to start; MyDMARC is easier to operate after setup.
Postmark's email-first experience had almost no learning curve, but we kept leaving the product to answer the next question. MyDMARC required more setup attention, then gave us a more useful place to return when the unknown sender and forwarded mail case needed review.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
4.6/5
Fast DNS setup
Unknown sender needs tracker
Forwarded SPF lacks context
MyDMARC
0/5
Three domains visible
Unknown sender easier
Forwarding case explainable
Adding the corporate domain to Postmark was quick because the workflow mostly came down to publishing a DMARC TXT record and waiting for the weekly digest. The marketing subdomain and parked domain were less satisfying in daily use because there was no shared dashboard for side-by-side review. When the unknown sender appeared, we copied details into our own tracker before deciding whether to investigate the support desk sender or a vendor path.
MyDMARC took longer during onboarding because we added the three domains, checked parsing cadence, and reviewed how each sender appeared in the interface. Once reports arrived, the dashboard made it easier to explain why forwarded mail failed SPF while DKIM domain matching preserved enough trust for the message path. The remaining friction was that the product surfaced evidence more than it explained ownership.
Support
Self serve help
Both products work for self-serve setup; neither felt like a full enforcement handoff.
Postmark's free product set expectations around self-service unless the user is already a Postmark customer. MyDMARC gave clearer paid-tier support signals, but enterprise onboarding, DNS handoff, and escalation detail still needed confirmation before a high-risk rollout.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
4.6/5
Self-service expectations
DNS handoff is manual
Enterprise path unclear
MyDMARC
0/5
Priority support on Pro
Better handoff screenshots
Escalation scope unclear
For Postmark, the support experience matched the product shape: the free workflow was simple enough that we did not need help to publish the initial record, but the next steps were not handled for us. When the support desk sender produced mixed domain matching, the email digest did not create a clean handoff for DNS ownership or vendor escalation. Enterprise onboarding was not the natural path for this free weekly product.
For MyDMARC, the public tiers made support priority clearer on the Pro plan, and the dashboard gave us better screenshots for DNS handoff. We could package the Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace passes, the Mailchimp subdomain DKIM case, and the unauthorized spoof sample into a support note. The unanswered buying question was how far support goes beyond product guidance into enforcement planning and escalation with internal owners.
Suitability
Buyer fit
Postmark fits passive owners; MyDMARC fits active SMB operators.
For MSPs and teams with several domains, the main buying criteria are account separation, recurring reports, alert quality, and client handoff notes. MyDMARC came closer than Postmark for domain grouping, but neither product gave us the MSP workflow depth we would want before managing many clients in parallel.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
4.6/5
Parked domains fit
Weak client grouping
Manual handoff notes
MyDMARC
0/5
SMB domains fit
Some grouping structure
MSP routing needs proof
Postmark's free weekly product fit the parked domain and a low-change personal-style domain best. It did not fit our MSP-style test well because account separation, domain grouping, and recurring client handoff were outside the core workflow. For enterprise use, the lack of shared review surfaces made it hard to coordinate security, marketing, and IT owners around policy movement.
MyDMARC was a better fit for an SMB with a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a small set of known senders. The domain limits and retention tiers gave us enough structure for recurring reporting, and client handoff was possible through exported notes and screenshots. MSPs would still need to validate account separation, alert routing, and repeatable monthly reporting before standardizing on it.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
A weekly pulse for one simple domain
After 90 days, Postmark's free weekly product felt best when the domain had a small number of known senders and low urgency. The primary domain digest confirmed expected Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic, while the parked domain made the unauthorized spoof sample stand out because there was little legitimate mail to compare against.
The limits became clear on the marketing subdomain. SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender all needed owner notes outside the product, and the forwarded mail SPF failure was easy to misread without a separate explanation of DKIM domain matching. We would not use the free weekly workflow as the main system for moving a business domain to reject.
Where it wins
Quick setup for one domain
Free weekly monitoring
Useful parked-domain signal
Clear public free price
Where it lags
No daily dashboard
Top-source limits
Manual sender ownership
Weak enforcement workflow
Pricing
$0
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Fast DNS setup
G2 rating
4.6 / 5
MyDMARC
A practical dashboard for SMB DMARC monitoring
After 90 days, MyDMARC felt more like a working DMARC desk than a notification feed. We could move between the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain, then compare how Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender behaved under the same policy posture.
The product still left hard decisions to us. The unknown sender required manual classification, and the forwarded SPF failure needed explanation before a non-specialist would feel comfortable with policy movement. MyDMARC made the evidence easier to collect, but it did not remove the need for an owner who understands DMARC domain matching.
Where it wins
Multi-domain plans
Dashboard drilldowns
Better sender review
Clear monthly tiers
Where it lags
Manual classification remains
Limited support detail
No published API
No G2 review base
Pricing
From $19 / month
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Clear three-domain setup
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
MyDMARC
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free weekly email reporting covers one simple monitoring workflow with short report history.
$0
Free covers one monitored domain with 7 days of retention and daily parsing.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$0
The free product remains email-only and is not priced by volume.
$19 / month
Basic covers up to 5 monitored domains with 30 days of retention and hourly parsing.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$0
The free workflow has no public paid ladder for larger domain sets inside this product.
$49 / month
Pro covers up to 20 monitored domains with 90 days of retention and near real-time parsing.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Enterprise-style pricing was not listed for the free weekly product.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Plans above 20 domains and enterprise limits were not published on the official pricing page we reviewed.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
Postmark Free DMARC Weekly Digests prices are public list prices for the free product, checked as of May 15, 2026. MyDMARC prices use the official public monthly prices available during research, with enterprise pricing and limits above 20 domains not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026. Email-volume fit in the segment labels is an estimate for comparison because the public MyDMARC page did not publish message-volume caps.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Turn weekly findings into fixes
Postmark's free email digest surfaced our spoof sample, but the remediation work lived outside the product. Suped's product connects DMARC findings to guided fixes so the owner can move the record, sender, or policy decision forward.
Reduce manual sender classification
MyDMARC made the unknown sender easier to find, but we still had to classify it manually. Suped focuses on sending source identification and issue detection so Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and support desk traffic can be assigned faster.
Handle client and alert workflows
Both reviewed products needed more validation for MSP-style separation, recurring reporting, and alert routing. Suped's MSP workflows and alert controls address the handoff gaps we hit when reviewing multiple domains and owners.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark or MyDMARC?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
