Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark vs.
DMARCwise in 2026
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
DMARCwise
vs.
We tested Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark and DMARCwise for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. Postmark worked as a low-effort weekly email check; DMARCwise gave us a fuller operational workspace for source review, policy planning, and client-style reporting.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Free weekly DMARC email monitoring
Starts at
$0
Best fit
Personal domains and one-domain checks
In one line
It gave us a useful weekly signal for one domain, but unknown sender ownership, forwarding context, and policy movement stayed manual.
DMARCwise
DMARC reporting for SMBs and MSPs
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
SMBs, operators, and MSPs that need a dashboard
In one line
DMARCwise handled the multi-domain test well; if buying criteria include guided fixes, source ownership, and published starter pricing, Suped's product belongs in the same shortlist.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
TLDR: choose the weekly email, the DMARC workspace, or guided ownership
Pick Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark if
Best for one-domain owners who want a free weekly check
Setup took 11 minutes for the parked domain after TXT verification.
The weekly email caught the unauthorized spoof sample, but only as a high-level failure.
The unknown sender stayed unresolved until we matched IP ranges ourselves.
Free plan available
Pick DMARCwise if
Best for operators who need a working DMARC dashboard
All three domains sat in one workspace with useful retention differences by plan.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were named cleanly in the source list.
The forwarded SPF failure had enough detail for a written owner handoff.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
For teams that want guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
We would require guided fixes that turn each failing sender into a concrete DNS or vendor action.
We would expect automated issue detection to flag new failures without waiting for a weekly review.
We would check published starter pricing before finance approves the first paid step.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
DMARCwise
Suped
DMARC report analysis
How raw aggregate reports become reviewable evidence.
Weekly email summary, limited history
Dashboard analysis on free and paid plans
Dashboard analysis with guided fixes
Source detection
How well the tool names sending services.
Top 10 sources only
Clear service naming
Source identification and ownership
Forward detection
Whether forwarded mail gets called out cleanly.
Manual workflow
Partial, visible in report drilldowns
Supported with failure context
Spoof detection
Whether unauthorized use is easy to separate.
High-level failure signal
Clear failed-source review
Supported with alerts
Notifications and alerts
How failures reach the right operator.
Weekly email only
Weekly digests and account notices
Alerting with noise control
Reporting
How evidence gets shared after review.
Email reporting only
Dashboard and exports
Reports and exports
API
Whether teams can automate reporting data.
Not available in the weekly workflow
Paid tier
API available
Multi-tenancy
Whether separate clients or business units stay cleanly separated.
No account separation
MSP plan
Client and domain workspaces
SPF flattening
Whether SPF lookup pressure is handled by the product.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Whether DMARC records can be managed inside the product.
Not supported
Paid tier
Supported
Hosted SPF
Whether SPF records can be hosted and maintained.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Whether MTA-STS policy hosting is covered.
Not supported
TLS reporting, not hosted MTA-STS
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Whether blocklist or blacklist risk is tracked.
No blocklist or blacklist monitoring
No blocklist or blacklist monitoring
Blocklist and blacklist monitoring
Automatic issue detection
Whether new issues are raised without manual scanning.
Manual review
Diagnostics and record checks
Automated issue detection
AI copilot
Whether the product gives assistant-style investigation help.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
DNS monitoring
Whether DNS record changes are checked over time.
Partial, DMARC record check
Record validation and domain checks
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Whether the product can run on your own infrastructure.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
Whether buyers can start without a paid commitment.
Free tier
Free tier and paid trial
Free tier
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against the same editorial rubric after the 90-day setup. Higher is better in every row, and a 0 means we did not find usable support for that dimension in the tested product.
Postmark is narrow and easy; DMARCwise covers more of the operating work.
The scores separate because the tools solve different jobs. Postmark gave us a weekly signal but no dashboard, client grouping, or hosted records in the weekly product, so source ownership and policy movement stayed manual. DMARCwise moved faster after setup because reports, diagnostics, and MSP views lived in one place, but it still left SPF flattening, hosted MTA-STS, and blacklist or blocklist monitoring outside the tested workflow.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark score
28/100
DMARCwise score
60/100
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
28/100
DMARC enforcement
2.0
Customer support
3.0
Source resolution
3.0
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
0.0
Alerting and integrations
1.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
9.5
Time to enforcement
2.5
DMARCwise
60/100
DMARC enforcement
7.0
Customer support
6.0
Source resolution
7.5
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
8.0
Alerting and integrations
5.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
4.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
7.0
Feature set
Scope vs operation
DMARCwise has the fuller feature set; Postmark keeps the weekly check simple.
DMARCwise handled more of the reporting workflow in our test, especially source review, diagnostics, exports, and paid-plan API access. Postmark wins only when the buyer wants a free weekly email for one domain. Suped's product is relevant as a buying benchmark when guided fixes or automated issue detection need to turn raw report visibility into the next action.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Microsoft 365 appeared in email
Unknown sender stayed manual
Forwarded SPF needed explanation
DMARCwise
Google Workspace grouped cleanly
SendGrid and Mailchimp named
DKIM subdomain case explained
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark stayed close to its promise: it emailed a readable weekly view, named obvious sources such as Microsoft 365, and showed our unauthorized spoof sample as failed traffic. The limits showed up on the marketing subdomain, where SendGrid and Mailchimp competed for the small source list, and the unknown sender needed a separate IP lookup before we could assign an owner.
DMARCwise gave us a dashboard view across the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain. It named Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp more consistently, kept the DKIM pass on a subdomain tied to the right source, and gave enough drilldown detail to explain the forwarded mail SPF failure without treating it as a spoof.
User experience
Speed vs control
Postmark starts faster; DMARCwise is easier to run after setup.
Postmark had the least setup friction because the weekly workflow asks for a DMARC TXT record and then waits for reports. DMARCwise took more configuration, but it paid back that time when we had to find the unknown sender and explain why forwarded mail broke SPF.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
TXT setup was fast
Unknown sender required lookup
Forwarded SPF lacked context
DMARCwise
Three domains stayed grouped
Unknown sender had notes
Forwarding context was clearer
Postmark's weekly workflow was the fastest to start. We added DMARC TXT records, verified delivery to the reporting address, and waited for the first digest, but each domain felt separate and the unknown sender review happened outside the product.
DMARCwise took longer because we had to set up the organization, domain groups, and sender review states. After that, the interface made daily work easier: the forwarded mail SPF failure was visible beside authentication results, and the unknown sender could be labelled with notes before policy changes.
Support
Self-serve vs guided support
DMARCwise gives clearer support paths; Postmark keeps support light for the free weekly product.
Postmark's weekly product is easy enough that many small owners can start without help, but the support handoff is thin once sender ownership or enterprise review enters the job. DMARCwise sets clearer expectations for paid email support, MSP documentation, and DNS guidance.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Self-serve setup was clear
DNS handoff stayed basic
Enterprise path was unclear
DMARCwise
Email support on paid plans
DNS guidance was stronger
MSP docs helped handoff
For Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark, support expectations were modest. The setup copy got us through the DNS record, but the marketing subdomain handoff needed our own notes for SendGrid and Mailchimp, and we did not see an enterprise onboarding path inside the free weekly workflow.
DMARCwise gave clearer support boundaries: free users get best-effort help, paid plans list email support and guidance, and the MSP material explains client access and recurring digest management. For a DNS escalation, the hosted DMARC record flow gave us a better handoff artifact, though we still had to write the final owner-specific instructions ourselves.
Suitability
Single owner vs operating team
Postmark fits lightweight monitoring; DMARCwise fits teams with domain and client structure.
Postmark is for a lightweight owner; DMARCwise is for teams running DMARC as an ongoing process across domains. Domain count matters, but account separation, recurring reports, and alert quality decide how much handoff work remains. Suped's product belongs in that evaluation when MSP workflows and alert routing need to be owned in the same place as DMARC fixes.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Best for one-domain checks
No client grouping
Weekly handoff only
DMARCwise
Strong SMB fit
MSP plan is defined
Recurring reports worked
Postmark fits a buyer who wants a free weekly digest for one domain and accepts manual follow-up. In our test, account separation, domain grouping, and client handoff were outside the product's weekly workflow, so an MSP or enterprise team would need their own ticket templates and reporting cadence.
DMARCwise fit the SMB and operator profile better. Domain grouping, recurring reports, exports, and MSP billing gave us a clearer client handoff path, and the Growth or Scale tiers made more sense once the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain needed the same review process.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Best when a weekly email is enough
After 90 days, Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark felt like a reminder system. It helped us see whether the corporate domain had obvious authentication failures, and it caught the spoof sample, but the 7-day history and email-only workflow meant every deeper question moved into spreadsheets and DNS notes.
On the marketing subdomain, the top-source limit made SendGrid and Mailchimp review feel cramped once both sent meaningful volume. The parked domain was a better fit: the weekly email made any failed traffic easy to spot, and there was little day-to-day work once the record was verified.
Where it wins
Free weekly monitoring for one domain
Fast DNS setup
Readable email summaries
Useful parked-domain signal
Where it lags
No dashboard in weekly product
Limited source and IP detail
No client grouping
Manual unknown-sender ownership
Pricing
$0
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
11-minute DNS setup
G2 rating
4.6 / 5
DMARCwise
Best when DMARC needs an operating dashboard
After 90 days, DMARCwise felt like a working console rather than a digest. We could move between Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender, label the unknown source, and keep owner notes beside the evidence.
The extra setup paid off when we prepared a policy movement plan. DMARCwise gave us enough retention and drilldown on paid tiers to explain the forwarded SPF failure, separate it from the spoof sample, and hand off sender fixes by domain group.
Where it wins
Clear multi-domain dashboard
Good sender classification flow
MSP plan and client access
Public paid tiers
Where it lags
No G2 review base
No SPF flattening
No blocklist or blacklist monitoring
Monthly prices not fully visible
Pricing
From €15 / month, billed yearly
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
26-minute workspace setup
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
DMARCwise
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Covers one domain with weekly email reporting, 7 days of history, and limited source detail.
$0
Free plan covers 1 domain, 1,000 emails per month as a soft limit, and 2 weeks of retention.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
Not available
The weekly product does not publicly support two domains in one account or expanded history.
From €15 / month
Starter is billed yearly at €180 plus taxes and covers 3 domains with unlimited paid-plan report volume.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
Not available
The weekly product has no public 10-domain tier and no volume-based paid tier.
From €39 / month
Growth is billed yearly at €468 plus taxes and covers 20 domains with 6 months of retention.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not available
No public enterprise tier is listed for Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark.
From €99 / month
Scale is billed yearly at €1,188 plus taxes and covers 100 domains with 1 year of retention; MSP pricing starts at €100 / month.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
Postmark's $0 price and DMARCwise yearly billing prices are public list prices checked as of May 15, 2026. No undiscounted monthly DMARCwise estimates are used; the €15, €39, and €99 figures are public annual-billing monthly equivalents. Not available means the requested segment exceeds the published scope of Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Source ownership
Postmark's weekly digest made the unknown sender a manual owner hunt. Suped's product turns sending sources into owners, fix steps, and review states.
Hosted records
Postmark's weekly product gave us a TXT target but no hosted record workflow; DMARCwise covered hosted DMARC, not SPF flattening or hosted MTA-STS in our test. Suped's product keeps those records and the fix queue together.
Alert context
Postmark's weekly email was too slow for the spoof sample, and DMARCwise still needed manual explanation for forwarded SPF failure. Suped's product routes alerts with failure reason, affected sender, and next action.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark or DMARCwise?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
