Suped

Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark vs.
DMARC-SRG in 2026

Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark dashboard screenshot
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
DMARC-SRG dashboard screenshot
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
vs.
We tested both products for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender connected. Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark worked best as a lightweight weekly check-in, while DMARC-SRG gave us more raw control at the cost of setup, classification, and operational follow-through.
Published 4 Nov 2025
Updated 30 May 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Free weekly DMARC email reporting
Starts at
$0
Best fit
Single-domain owners who want a periodic health check
In one line
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark gave us a readable weekly summary, but it lacked the drilldowns, ownership workflow, and alerting needed for steady enforcement.
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
Self-hosted DMARC report parser
Starts at
$0 software cost
Best fit
Technical operators who want to host and inspect reports themselves
In one line
DMARC-SRG is a free self-hosted parser for operators who accept manual source ownership; Suped's product is a useful buying benchmark when guided fixes and published starter pricing matter.
suped.com logo
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped

Pick the lightweight digest or the self-hosted parser

Pick Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark if
Choose Postmark's free weekly digest for one low-risk domain
The parked domain setup took one DNS record and gave us a clean first weekly email.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared in the summary without needing a dashboard session.
The unauthorized spoof sample appeared as a failing source, but only after the next weekly digest.
Free plan available
Pick DMARC-SRG if
Choose DMARC-SRG when your team wants full self-hosted control
Our mailbox ingestion test kept raw aggregate reports available for local review.
SendGrid and Mailchimp rows were visible, but service ownership remained a manual classification step.
The forwarded mail SPF failure was inspectable, but the tool did not explain the forwarding path for a non-specialist.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Choose Suped when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership need one workflow
Classifies sending sources and suggests owner-ready fixes after authentication failures.
Raises automated issue alerts for spoofing, DNS drift, and new sender changes.
Has MSP workflows and published starter pricing for multi-domain rollout.
Free plan available

The differences that actually change your week

postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
suped.com logo
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Turns aggregate XML into a readable view of authentication results.
Weekly email analysis only
Self-hosted report analysis
Dashboard analysis included
Source detection
Identifies which services are sending mail for the domain.
Partial, top sources only
Manual workflow
Source identification included
Forward detection
Explains forwarded mail cases where SPF fails but DKIM or DMARC still gives useful context.
Not surfaced clearly
Manual inference
Forwarding context included
Spoof detection
Flags unauthenticated sources that claim to send as the domain.
Digest visibility
Manual review
Spoofing alerts included
Notifications and alerts
Pushes useful changes to the right person without requiring a daily login.
Weekly digest only
Reporting only
Alert routing included
Reporting
Creates recurring views that a domain owner or client can understand.
Weekly email report
Summary report options
Recurring reporting included
API
Exposes report data for external workflows.
Not part of the digest workflow
No dedicated API
API available
Multi-tenancy
Separates clients, domains, and operational ownership cleanly.
No account separation
Manual separation
Multi-tenant workflows included
SPF flattening
Reduces SPF lookup problems through managed flattening.
Not supported
Not supported
SPF flattening included
Hosted DMARC
Hosts the DMARC policy record so policy changes are managed in-app.
Record setup only
Not hosted
Hosted DMARC included
Hosted SPF
Hosts and manages SPF records for the domain.
Not supported
Not supported
Hosted SPF included
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosts MTA-STS policy and related TLS reporting workflow.
Not supported
Not supported
Hosted MTA-STS included
Blocklists and reputation
Tracks blocklist (blacklist) or reputation signals that affect sending risk.
No blocklist (blacklist) monitoring
No blocklist (blacklist) monitoring
Blocklist (blacklist) monitoring included
Automatic issue detection
Detects material authentication changes without manual row inspection.
Manual follow-up
Manual follow-up
Automatic detection included
AI copilot
Gives plain-language guidance for investigation and remediation.
Not supported
Not supported
AI guidance included
DNS monitoring
Watches DNS records for drift, missing records, or risky changes.
Initial verification only
Not tested
DNS monitoring included
Self hostable
Can run in your own environment instead of a hosted SaaS account.
Hosted service
Self-hosted
Hosted SaaS
Free trial/free tier
Lets a team start without an initial paid subscription.
Free tier
Free self-hosted software
Free plan available

Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10

We scored each product against the same editorial rubric after the 90-day setup. Higher is better in every row, and unsupported capabilities score 0.0 rather than getting partial credit for adjacent manual work.

Postmark is easier to start, while DMARC-SRG gives more local control

Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark scored higher on setup speed and pricing clarity because our three domains were easy to verify and the free offer was clear. DMARC-SRG scored better only where self-hosted inspection mattered, since we could keep raw reports locally and filter them by domain. Both products scored 0.0 on hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, and blocklist (blacklist) monitoring because neither product supported those workflows in our test.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark score
31/100
DMARC-SRG score
20.5/100
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
31/100
DMARC enforcement
3.0
Customer support
4.0
Source resolution
4.0
Setup and onboarding
6.5
MSP workflows
0.0
Alerting and integrations
2.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
3.5
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
20.5/100
DMARC enforcement
2.5
Customer support
1.5
Source resolution
3.0
Setup and onboarding
3.0
MSP workflows
1.5
Alerting and integrations
0.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
6.5
Time to enforcement
2.5

Feature set

Digest vs parser

Postmark wins on low-friction summaries. DMARC-SRG wins on raw report access.

Postmark narrowed the work to weekly source and authentication summaries, which helped on the parked domain but slowed investigation of the spoof sample. DMARC-SRG exposed more raw evidence, but it made source ownership and next steps our job. Suped's product is relevant here as a buying benchmark: guided fixes and automated issue detection matter when unknown senders and authentication edge cases need fast triage.
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark screenshot
Microsoft 365 surfaced quickly
Mailchimp needed owner checking
Unknown sender stayed unresolved
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC-SRG screenshot
Raw SendGrid rows retained
Mailbox ingestion worked
Forwarded SPF needed context
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark recognized Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace quickly enough for a weekly operating rhythm, and the parked domain gave us a clean signal when the spoof sample arrived. The marketing subdomain was harder: Mailchimp appeared as a source, but the digest did not give us a drilldown that tied the DKIM pass on the subdomain to a clear owner action. The unknown sender stayed unresolved until we checked headers and DNS outside the product.
DMARC-SRG gave us the raw rows we needed for SendGrid, Mailchimp, Microsoft 365, and Google Workspace, and its local retention made repeat inspection simple once the parser was running. The tradeoff was classification: the unknown sender looked like another reporting row until we manually labeled it, and the SPF pass with visible From mismatch needed our own explanation. It was useful for a technical operator, not a guided enforcement workflow.

User experience

Speed vs control

Postmark is easier for weekly reading. DMARC-SRG is easier to audit after setup.

Postmark had the simpler first week because DNS verification and the first digest were straightforward. DMARC-SRG took more work before it paid back: after the server, database, mailbox, and parser ran correctly, it gave us more repeatable local inspection. Neither product turned the forwarded mail SPF failure into a plain remediation path.
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark screenshot
Fast DNS verification
Weekly reading was clear
No midweek drilldown
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC-SRG screenshot
Self-hosting took work
Local filters helped
Forwarding needed expertise
Onboarding the three test domains into Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark was fast, especially for the parked domain where the expected state was no legitimate mail. The product felt calm for weekly review, but there was no dashboard trail when we wanted to find the unknown sender between digests. Explaining the forwarded mail SPF failure took extra work because the email summary did not show enough path context.
DMARC-SRG felt like an operator console rather than a managed app. Onboarding required server preparation, database setup, mailbox ingestion, cron checks, and cleanup settings before the three domains were usable. Once running, finding the unknown sender was faster than waiting for a digest, but explaining why forwarded mail failed SPF still depended on our own DMARC knowledge.

Support

Self serve vs self support

Postmark gives clearer setup expectations. DMARC-SRG depends on your administrator.

Postmark's support path matched the free product: setup material and basic guidance were enough for a single domain, but escalation expectations were limited. DMARC-SRG had no managed onboarding or enterprise handoff in our test, so DNS, mailbox, database, and security maintenance stayed with us. That makes support fit a major buying line, not a minor preference.
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark screenshot
DNS handoff was clear
Escalation was limited
Enterprise onboarding absent
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC-SRG screenshot
Administrator support required
No managed onboarding
Database care stayed internal
For Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark, DNS handoff was easy to explain to a domain administrator because the required TXT record was clear. The harder part came after first setup: when the support desk sender failed DKIM domain matching and the unknown sender appeared, we had no structured escalation path inside the product. Enterprise onboarding also felt outside the product's intended scope because there was no account separation, handoff notes, or assigned rollout process.
DMARC-SRG support expectations were even more technical. We had to handle PHP configuration, database access, IMAP ingestion, local backups, and web UI access control before DMARC review even started. DNS handoff was not packaged for a non-technical owner, and escalation meant project-level troubleshooting rather than a managed support flow.

Suitability

Solo domain vs technical team

Postmark suits a simple domain owner. DMARC-SRG suits an operator with hosting discipline.

Postmark was a better fit for SMBs that only need a weekly signal on one domain and do not need client handoff. DMARC-SRG fit teams that already own server operations and want local report storage. For agencies and MSPs, Suped's product is the cleaner buying benchmark when account separation, alert quality, recurring reporting, and client-ready handoff notes are required.
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark screenshot
Best for one domain
Weak client handoff
No account grouping
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC-SRG screenshot
Best for operators
Manual client separation
Reports need packaging
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark did not give us the account separation or domain grouping we wanted for an MSP-style workflow. The corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain each needed context that did not naturally roll up into client notes. It worked for an SMB owner checking one domain, but recurring reporting and handoff were too thin for a multi-client service.
DMARC-SRG handled multiple domains in the sense that we could ingest and filter report data, but it did not create business-level separation. We could separate clients only through our deployment and documentation choices, and recurring reporting still needed manual packaging. It is a better fit for an internal technical team than for an enterprise program or MSP workflow that needs clean client boundaries.

What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use

postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark

A useful weekly check-in for one domain

After 90 days, Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark felt like a mailbox-friendly status check. It was useful on the parked domain because any authenticated mail would have been suspicious, and it was enough to confirm that Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were consistently passing.
The product became limiting when the marketing subdomain and support desk sender needed decisions. The Mailchimp and SendGrid results were visible at summary level, but we still had to classify ownership, explain the forwarded SPF failure, and decide whether the unknown sender was safe or unauthorized.
Where it wins
Fast setup for a parked domain.
Readable weekly email summary.
Clear free pricing.
Useful for low-change domains.
Where it lags
No midweek investigation view.
Limited sender classification.
No MSP account separation.
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS.
Pricing
$0
Free tier
Included
Onboarding
Fast DNS record setup
G2 rating
4.6 / 5
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG

A practical parser for teams that own the stack

After 90 days, DMARC-SRG felt useful when we wanted to inspect the underlying report data ourselves. The corporate domain and marketing subdomain were easier to compare once ingestion was stable, and we could revisit SendGrid and Mailchimp rows without waiting for a weekly email.
The product also made us carry the operational burden. Server maintenance, mailbox ingestion, report cleanup, backups, access control, source labels, and explanation of authentication edge cases all stayed outside the tool.
Where it wins
Free software license.
Local report retention.
Mailbox ingestion worked.
Useful raw row filtering.
Where it lags
Setup required administrator time.
No managed support path.
No proactive alerts.
No guided enforcement workflow.
Pricing
$0 software cost
Free tier
Open-source self-hosted
Onboarding
Server and mailbox setup
G2 rating
0 / 5

Pricing

postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
suped.com logo
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Fits one domain with weekly email reports and limited history.
$0 software cost
Hosting, database, mailbox, backups, and administrator time sit outside the price.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
No matching plan
The free product did not give us one account view for both domains.
$0 software cost
Capacity depends on the server, database, mailbox polling, and retention settings.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
No matching plan
The free product is not a multi-domain reporting plan.
$0 software cost
No software volume cap was published, but infrastructure capacity becomes the real limit.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
No matching plan
Enterprise account separation, escalation, and rollout pricing were not part of this free product.
$0 software cost
No paid SLA or managed onboarding tier was publicly listed.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
Postmark's Free DMARC Weekly Digests price is a public list price checked as of May 15, 2026. DMARC-SRG is $0 software cost, with hosting and administrator time estimated by the buyer; no paid tiers were publicly listed as of May 15, 2026.

If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped

Suped dashboard
Source ownership
Postmark's weekly digest showed the Mailchimp and unknown sender cases, but it did not create owner-ready remediation steps. Suped's product ties sending sources to concrete fixes and owner handoff.
Operational alerts
DMARC-SRG required manual row review, while Postmark's spoof visibility waited for the next digest. Suped's product routes higher-signal alerts for spoofing, DNS drift, and new sender changes.
Managed records
Neither reviewed product handled hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, or DNS monitoring in our test. Suped's product covers those records in the same operational workflow as DMARC reporting.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark or DMARC-SRG?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.

Frequently asked questions

Here's why customers love Suped for DMARC monitoring

MONEYME cover

How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped

See how MONEYME uses Suped
Jam Cyber cover

How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped

See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
DigiBean cover

How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients

See how DigiBean uses Suped
Alliance Group cover

How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped

See how Alliance Group uses Suped
Maaser cover

How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement

See how Maaser uses Suped
G2 LeaderG2 Users Most Likely To RecommendG2 Easiest To Do Business WithG2 High PerformerG2 Best Estimated ROI
DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard
What you'll get with Suped
Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing