Suped

Fraudmarc vs OnDMARC

Choose Fraudmarc for essential DMARC needs, choose OnDMARC for comprehensive features and deep insights.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc provides a solid foundation for DMARC implementation and monitoring. It focuses on the core aspects of DMARC reporting, offering clear visibility into email authentication results, which is crucial for identifying legitimate sending sources and detecting potential spoofing attempts.
We found Fraudmarc's feature set to be straightforward and effective for organizations primarily focused on achieving DMARC compliance without needing an overly complex suite of tools. It helps to simplify the often daunting task of DMARC record management and data interpretation.
OnDMARC, on the other hand, offers a robust and comprehensive feature set designed for more intricate email security landscapes. Beyond standard DMARC reporting, it excels with features like Dynamic SPF, which helps overcome the 10-lookup limit, and an Investigate tool for instant deliverability diagnostics.
Their platform also includes forensic reporting capabilities, API access for integration, and Smart alerts, making it a powerful tool for organizations that require deep analysis, automation, and proactive threat detection. The "Radar" AI features aim to provide next-level protection beyond DMARC enforcement.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Our experience with Fraudmarc indicates a strong emphasis on user-friendliness and simplicity. The dashboard is intuitive, presenting DMARC reports in an easy-to-digest format that allows users to quickly understand their email authentication status without being overwhelmed by excessive data.
The platform aims to streamline the DMARC journey, making it accessible even for those relatively new to email authentication protocols. Its straightforward design translates into a quicker learning curve and efficient daily monitoring for essential DMARC management.
OnDMARC offers a powerful user experience, but it can have a steeper learning curve, especially for users unfamiliar with advanced email authentication concepts. While the platform is packed with features, some users have noted that the GUI can be a bit challenging to navigate or clunky at times.
However, once familiarized, the comprehensive interface provides extensive visibility and control over DMARC, SPF, and DKIM. The platform's guided workflows and detailed insights, despite initial complexities, empower users to move towards full DMARC enforcement confidently.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc generally provides responsive support, focusing on guiding users through the essential steps of DMARC setup and ongoing management. For users who prefer a more self-service approach with backup from a knowledgeable team, Fraudmarc's support is typically sufficient.
We found their assistance to be practical for core DMARC issues, ensuring that even organizations with limited email security expertise can navigate the complexities of authentication protocols effectively.
OnDMARC's support receives widespread praise, often highlighted as a significant strength. Users consistently report excellent experiences with responsive and knowledgeable support staff, including dedicated account managers and regular check-ins.
This hands-on approach is particularly valuable for complex implementations, troubleshooting, and leveraging advanced features like Dynamic SPF and forensic reporting. They offer various channels, from email to chat and phone support for higher tiers, ensuring comprehensive assistance for diverse needs.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc is an excellent choice for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) and organizations just beginning their DMARC journey. Its user-friendly interface and focus on core DMARC functionalities make it less intimidating for those without extensive email security resources.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs) managing a portfolio of clients needing basic DMARC compliance, Fraudmarc offers a straightforward solution. While suitable for basic Enterprise needs, larger organizations seeking advanced threat intelligence and integrations might find it less comprehensive.
OnDMARC is particularly well-suited for Mid-Market and Enterprise organizations that require a sophisticated, feature-rich DMARC solution. Its advanced capabilities, such as Dynamic SPF, forensic reporting, and AI-driven insights, cater to complex email ecosystems and high-volume senders.
MSPs serving enterprise clients with demanding security requirements would also find OnDMARC highly beneficial due to its multi-tenancy capabilities and comprehensive feature set. SMBs might find its extensive features and pricing more than they initially need, but the Express plan offers a solid entry point.

How does Fraudmarc compare with OnDMARC?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Fraudmarc's main drawback is its more limited feature set compared to some competitors. While excellent for fundamental DMARC management, it may not offer the advanced forensic capabilities, AI-driven insights, or extensive integration options that larger enterprises might require. OnDMARC, despite its powerful features, sometimes presents a user interface that can feel less intuitive or "clunky" to navigate, particularly for new users, and its comprehensive nature might lead to a steeper initial learning curve.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Great for Managing Multiple DMAC Traces, Needs Auto-Triage for Forensic Reports
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? Managing multiple DMARC traces has become much simpler. By enabling BIMI, we were able to significantly reduce our key risks with both customers and partners. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? There is a need for automatic triaging of forensic reports, along with notifications if any anomalies are detected. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? BIMI helps our customers and partners recognize phishing scams more easily.
Verified User in Retail
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Dynamic SPF and Powerful Features, GUI Could Use Improvement
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? I have been using Red Sift OnDMARC for over three years for monitoring DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across multiple domains, which would be difficult to manage without such a tool. It offers the ease of dynamic SPF and dynamic DMARC, which simplify complex monitoring tasks. The software provides a powerful set of features, making any initial setup challenges worthwhile. I especially value the single pane of glass interface as an IT administrator managing domains that engineers use, allowing me to track domain usage, detect spam issues, and dynamically update DMARC, DKIM, and SPF with ease. The dynamic SPF and DMARC/DKIM reports are integral for my operations, as they save considerable time by turning potentially lengthy tasks into several-minute jobs. Furthermore, the friendliness and support from our account manager, alongside our quarterly meetings, enhance the overall experience and decision to continue using the platform. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? I find the GUI a little bit difficult to navigate sometimes and a bit clunky, which sometimes makes it hard to find what I want. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? I use the product to monitor DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across domains, simplifying updates and detecting spam issues with ease. It turns lengthy tasks into minutes, providing a comprehensive view of domain usage and security.
Brice P.
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC implementation with great visibility
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? OnDMARC makes it very easy to set up and maintain DMARC records. The guided workflows and clear reporting helped us move from monitoring to full enforcement confidently. The user interface is intuitive, and support is very responsive whenever we have questions. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? It would be helpful if some of the reporting dashboards allowed more customization or export options. Sometimes, the volume of daily reports can feel overwhelming without filtering. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? It is helping us prevent domain spoofing and phishing attacks by enforcing DMARC policies. It has also improved visibility into who is sending emails on behalf of our domain, so we can take quick action if needed. Overall, it has strengthened our email security posture and improved trust in our communications.
Shashi K.
SR Manager IT Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
It is quite a useful tool to manage SPF/DKIM/DMARC records and understand it's impact on the domain.
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? The ease of using the application and the UI that is provides that helps in managing the records of the domain. Plus the customer service for the tool is quite responsive. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? The limitation of the feature of MTA-STS, in which it reports only a few of the domains. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? It helps us in getting a clearer picture of the use case of our domain, plus the acceptance and the rejection rate.
Ashman B.
CyberSecurity Analyst Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC setup
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? We have had OnDMARC for several years, we onboarded all of our managed domains over the past 12months. It was very easy adding SPF, DKIM records and moving DMARC to 100% Reject. We had support from Red Sift all the way. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? Sometimes the dashboard is misleading, i had moved a domain to reject 50% and the dashboard didn't reflect that. but customer support fixed that very quickly What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? Securing our domains to bring them up to 100% Reject
Verified User in Law Practice
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

Pricing

Fraudmarc primarily uses a contact-for-pricing model, whereas OnDMARC offers a clear tiered SaaS model with a publicly available Express plan and higher tiers requiring sales engagement.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
$9 USD/month (billed annually)
Medium
Contact for pricing
$9 USD/month (billed annually)
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact sales
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact sales

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Fraudmarc or OnDMARC?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Fraudmarc vs OnDMARC DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped