Fraudmarc Community Edition (CE) provides the essential DMARC reporting functionality in a completely open-source package. It’s designed for those who want full control over their DMARC data without recurring costs. We found it focuses on the core mechanics of DMARC report collection and basic analysis, leaving more advanced features to a technically adept user base.
As a self-managed solution, Fraudmarc CE expects users to handle deployment, configuration, and ongoing maintenance. While the foundational DMARC reporting is present, it does not include the advanced features found in Fraudmarc's commercial offerings, such as Universal SPF or Outbox Protection, meaning users must integrate other tools or processes for a comprehensive email security posture.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is primarily an ingestion and parsing tool for DMARC aggregate and forensic reports within the Splunk ecosystem. It allows organizations to centralize DMARC data alongside other security logs, leveraging Splunk's powerful search and visualization capabilities for DMARC analysis. Its strength lies in its integration with a broader SIEM strategy.
However, it's crucial to remember that this add-on is 'archived' and 'not supported.' This means we shouldn't expect ongoing development or official fixes. While it provides the raw data, the interpretation, alerting, and advanced threat hunting still largely depend on the user's Splunk expertise and existing Splunk infrastructure. It's a foundational component, not a full DMARC platform.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Fraudmarc Community Edition is not for the faint of heart, or those looking for a plug-and-play solution. Its open-source, self-managed nature means we need a certain level of technical knowledge for implementation and ongoing maintenance. Users should be comfortable with command-line interfaces and server management to get the most out of it.
The user experience is very much hands-on. There isn't a polished graphical user interface out of the box that simplifies DMARC report interpretation for novices. Instead, it offers the flexibility and transparency that comes with open source, but with the expectation that the user builds their own reporting and visualization layers atop the raw data.
Using the Splunk TA-DMARC add-on requires a solid existing Splunk environment and proficiency with Splunk's query language and dashboard creation. The add-on itself merely facilitates data ingestion. The actual 'user experience' for DMARC analysis is then dictated by the user's expertise in configuring Splunk, building dashboards, and setting up alerts.
Its 'archived' status further complicates the user experience. We found that deploying and configuring an unsupported add-on might involve troubleshooting unforeseen compatibility issues or relying on outdated documentation. While Splunk itself is powerful, the add-on's lack of active development means the DMARC-specific UX is static and requires significant internal effort to maintain and enhance.
Which product has the best support
Support
Support for Fraudmarc Community Edition is exclusively through their community forum. This means that while we can often find answers to common issues from other users, there's no official, dedicated support channel for urgent or complex problems. The burden of troubleshooting and problem-solving largely falls on the user.
For those accustomed to open-source communities, this might be sufficient. However, for critical DMARC deployment issues, relying solely on community support can be a significant drawback. We've seen situations where quick, authoritative help is paramount, and a community forum may not always deliver that speed or depth of expertise.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is explicitly listed as 'Not Supported' and 'archived.' This means there's no official support from the developer or Splunk. Any issues we encounter, from installation to data parsing or reporting, must be resolved through internal resources or by consulting the broader Splunk community, which may or may not be familiar with this specific add-on.
This lack of support is a critical factor. When dealing with email security, having reliable support is essential. An archived and unsupported tool, while free, carries significant risks, as bug fixes or updates for new DMARC standards are unlikely. We would advise any user to factor this into their decision-making, as it impacts long-term viability.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Fraudmarc Community Edition is best suited for individual developers, small businesses (SMBs) with strong technical expertise, or cybersecurity researchers who want to deeply understand DMARC without financial investment. It's a great sandbox for learning or for organizations that prefer to build and manage everything in-house. It is not suitable for MSPs looking for client management features.
For enterprise-level deployments, Fraudmarc CE would require substantial internal development to meet the scale, reporting, and support needs typically demanded. Its self-managed nature and community-only support make it less ideal for organizations requiring high availability, dedicated assistance, or a comprehensive DMARC policy enforcement platform.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is highly specific: it's for organizations already heavily invested in Splunk, typically enterprises or larger SMBs, that wish to consolidate their DMARC data within their existing SIEM. It leverages the Splunk infrastructure they already have, making DMARC data another valuable input for their security operations.
It is generally unsuitable for SMBs without a Splunk instance, as the cost and complexity of setting up Splunk purely for DMARC are prohibitive. MSPs might find it challenging to deploy and manage across multiple clients given its unsupported status, requiring significant custom development and maintenance for each client. Organizations prioritizing direct DMARC management over SIEM integration would also find it less ideal.
How does Fraudmarc Community Edition compare with Splunk TA-DMARC add-on?
DMARC report analysis
Ability to parse and analyze DMARC aggregate reports.
Raw report processing, user-managed analysis.
Ingests and parses within Splunk.
Source detection
Identifies legitimate and illegitimate sending sources.
Requires manual interpretation of reports.
Via Splunk analytics on DMARC data.
Forward detection
Mechanisms to detect email forwarding scenarios.
Data present in reports, requires analysis.
Analyzable through Splunk queries.
Spoof detection
Identifies email impersonation attempts.
Core DMARC function reports.
Leverages DMARC reports in Splunk.
Notifications and alerts
Automated alerts for DMARC issues.
Not built-in, requires custom scripting.
Leverages Splunk's native alerting features.
Reporting
Generation of user-friendly DMARC reports.
Provides raw data, needs custom reporting.
Custom dashboards can be built in Splunk.
API
Programmatic access to DMARC data and controls.
No dedicated DMARC API for CE.
Splunk has API, but add-on isn't a DMARC API.
Multi-tenancy
Ability to manage multiple domains or clients.
Designed for single-instance, not MSPs.
Not designed for managing multiple tenants easily.
SPF flattening
Aggregating multiple SPF records.
Available in paid Fraudmarc products, not CE.
Not a feature of this add-on.
Hosted DMARC
Cloud-based DMARC management service.
Self-hosted solution.
Requires self-hosted or cloud Splunk instance.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Not explicitly supported.
No direct BIMI features.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security.
No direct support.
No direct support.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors sender reputation against blocklists.
Not a core feature.
Not included in add-on, possible with Splunk integration.
AI copilot
AI-powered assistance for DMARC analysis.
Not available.
Not available.
DNS monitoring
Monitors DNS records relevant to email authentication.
Requires external tools.
Requires external tools or Splunk custom config.
Self hostable
Can be installed and run on user's infrastructure.
Open-source, self-managed.
Runs on user's Splunk instance.
Free trial/free tier
Option to use the product without cost.
Completely free Community Edition.
Add-on is free, but Splunk has costs.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Fraudmarc Community Edition, while free and open source, demands significant technical expertise and offers only community support. Its self-managed nature means users must build out their own reporting and alerting mechanisms. Splunk TA-DMARC, though also free, is archived and unsupported, tying its utility to an existing, costly Splunk environment, and risking obsolescence due to lack of updates.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
0 / 5(0)
0 / 5(0)
Pricing
Both offerings are fundamentally free in their core DMARC functionality, but Fraudmarc CE is entirely self-contained, while Splunk TA-DMARC rides on top of an existing, potentially expensive, Splunk infrastructure.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Free (self-managed)
Free (requires Splunk)
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Free (self-managed)
Free (requires Splunk)
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Free (self-managed)
Free (requires Splunk)
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Free (self-managed), contact Fraudmarc for paid plans
Free (requires Splunk), contact Splunk for pricing
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with Fraudmarc Community Edition or Splunk TA-DMARC add-on?