We found DMARCwise offers a robust set of features. It excels in comprehensive DMARC report analysis, providing clear visualizations and actionable insights. We particularly appreciate its user-friendly interface for managing DMARC records and its support for advanced protocols like MTA-STS.
Its strength lies in making complex DMARC data digestible, helping us quickly identify and resolve email authentication issues. The platform's diagnostic tools are quite powerful, allowing for deep dives into email streams and potential spoofing attempts.
Report-URI, on the other hand, provides a more focused approach, primarily specializing in DMARC, CSP, and TLS reporting. We noted its detailed breakdown of raw DMARC reports, which is excellent for those who prefer to dig into the granular data themselves.
While it provides essential DMARC reporting, it doesn't extend to other email authentication aspects like SPF flattening or BIMI in the same integrated way as DMARCwise. It is a solid choice for dedicated DMARC monitoring.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
We found DMARCwise's interface to be intuitive and well-organized. Navigating through reports and settings felt natural, making it accessible even for users less familiar with the intricacies of DMARC. The dashboards offer clear summaries, and drill-downs are logically structured.
The setup process was straightforward, and the platform provides helpful guidance for adding domains and configuring DMARC records. We especially liked the visual representation of email traffic, which simplifies understanding authentication trends.
Report-URI has a functional and utilitarian interface. It's designed for efficiency, presenting data in a straightforward manner without much embellishment. For experienced users, this can be quite effective, as it minimizes distractions.
However, we observed that newer users might find the initial learning curve a bit steeper compared to DMARCwise, as it assumes a certain level of familiarity with DMARC concepts. The raw data focus is a strength for experts, but a potential hurdle for beginners.
Which product has the best support
Support
DMARCwise offers email support and guidance, which we found to be responsive and knowledgeable. Their team was helpful in clarifying technical details and assisting with configuration challenges. While not offering phone support, their email communication was thorough.
They also provide extensive documentation and guides within the platform, allowing us to find answers to common questions independently. The support experience felt personalized and efficient for our inquiries.
Report-URI primarily relies on community forums and documentation for support, alongside email for specific issues. We noted that direct, personalized support might be less readily available compared to DMARCwise, depending on the plan.
For users who prefer self-service and community-driven solutions, this approach works well. However, for complex issues requiring direct intervention, the response times can vary.
Who should use each product
Suitability
We believe DMARCwise is highly suitable for SMBs and growing businesses due to its balanced feature set and user-friendly interface. Its tiered pricing also makes it scalable. For MSPs (managed service providers), the 'Pay-as-you-go' plan with unlimited domains and flexible billing is a strong offering.
Enterprise clients would find the Scale plan and custom pricing options suitable for larger deployments. It provides a good blend of automation and control, making it a robust option for various organizational sizes looking for comprehensive DMARC management and improved deliverability.
Report-URI is an excellent fit for technical users, developers, and organizations primarily focused on receiving and parsing DMARC, CSP, and TLS reports. SMBs (small and medium businesses) with in-house technical expertise would benefit. For larger enterprises with dedicated security teams, it provides the raw data needed for in-depth analysis.
While it offers multi-tenancy for MSPs, its more hands-on approach might appeal to those who prefer direct access to raw data and have the resources to process it. It's less geared towards providing an all-in-one, simplified experience.
How does DMARCwise compare with Report-URI?
DMARC report analysis
Ability to analyze and visualize DMARC aggregate reports.
Source detection
Automated identification of legitimate email sending sources.
Requires manual interpretation
Forward detection
Identification of legitimate email forwarding that may impact DMARC.
Requires manual interpretation
Spoof detection
Detection of unauthorized emails attempting to spoof your domain.
Requires manual interpretation
Notifications and alerts
Automated alerts for DMARC issues or policy changes.
Reporting
Types and depth of reports available to users.
Comprehensive visual reports
Raw data and basic reports
API
Availability of an API for integration with other systems.
Multi-tenancy
Support for managing multiple clients or sub-organizations.
SPF flattening
Tools to manage and overcome SPF 10-lookup limit.
Hosted DMARC
Service to host and manage your DMARC DNS record.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security and TLS Reporting.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring of email sending IPs on blocklists (or blacklists).
AI copilot
AI-powered assistance for DMARC analysis and recommendations.
DNS monitoring
Monitoring of DNS records related to email security.
Limited to DMARC/CSP records
Self hostable
Option to host the DMARC reporting solution on your own infrastructure.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free trial period or a permanently free plan.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
We found that DMARCwise, while feature-rich, might be a bit more expensive for very small businesses compared to more basic options. Its focus is on comprehensive DMARC management, which might be overkill for those only needing raw report ingestion. Report-URI, while powerful for technical users, could present a steeper learning curve for those new to DMARC. Its interface is less visually guided, and advanced features often require more manual configuration or understanding of raw data.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
0 / 5(0)
5 / 5(1)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Monitoring for PROs
5.0 / 5
What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks Recommendations to others considering Report URI: Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you? It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Pricing
DMARCwise offers clear, tiered pricing with a generous free plan, while Report-URI's pricing details require direct contact.
0 / 5(0)
