Suped

DMARCPal vs Splunk TA-DMARC add-on

Choose DMARCPal for dedicated DMARC management, choose Splunk TA-DMARC for integrating into an existing Splunk setup.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal provides a focused suite of tools specifically designed for DMARC reporting and management. We find it excels at breaking down complex DMARC aggregate reports into understandable, actionable insights, helping users quickly identify sending sources and their DMARC compliance status.
It offers features like detailed reporting on email authentication results, which includes SPF and DKIM alignment, and helps with pinpointing potential spoofing attempts. The platform is built to streamline the DMARC implementation journey, making it a dedicated solution for email security administrators.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is primarily an ingest tool, designed to pull DMARC aggregate XML reports into a Splunk instance. Once the data is in Splunk, users can leverage Splunk's powerful search processing language (SPL) and dashboarding capabilities to analyze their DMARC data, often alongside other security logs.
While the add-on itself doesn't offer a pre-packaged, comprehensive DMARC user interface, its strength lies in its integration into an existing Splunk ecosystem. This allows for highly customizable reporting and correlation with broader security information, provided the user has the Splunk expertise to build it out.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal offers a clean, dedicated web interface, which we found intuitive for managing DMARC. The dashboards are designed to present DMARC data clearly, often with visual aids that help in quickly understanding compliance rates and identifying non-compliant senders.
For users new to DMARC or those who prefer a guided experience, DMARCPal's focused approach reduces the learning curve significantly. It's essentially an 'out-of-the-box' solution, requiring minimal setup beyond configuring your DMARC record to send reports.
The user experience for the Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is inextricably linked to the Splunk platform itself. This means that users must have a solid understanding of Splunk's interface, search language, and dashboard creation. It's less about a ready-made DMARC dashboard and more about building your own.
While powerful for those proficient in Splunk, this presents a significant barrier for users who are not Splunk experts. We've seen that the initial setup and ongoing customization can be quite time-consuming, requiring specific technical skills not typically found in a standard DMARC administrator.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As a dedicated SaaS platform, DMARCPal typically offers direct customer support channels, such as email or in-app chat. This is crucial for users who encounter issues or have questions about their DMARC implementation.
We expect a dedicated DMARC service like DMARCPal to provide timely assistance and access to documentation, helping users resolve problems efficiently and make progress on their DMARC journey.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is explicitly listed as "Not Supported" and "archived". This is a critical point, meaning there's no official support channel for issues or questions related to the add-on itself. Users are entirely reliant on community forums or their internal Splunk expertise.
While Splunk itself has robust support, any problems arising specifically from the TA-DMARC add-on, its parsing, or dashboarding would need to be addressed without direct developer assistance. This lack of support can significantly impact an organization's ability to maintain and troubleshoot the solution effectively, making us hesitant to recommend it for production environments.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal is well-suited for a broad range of users. Small to medium businesses (SMBs) will appreciate its ease of use and dedicated focus on DMARC, allowing them to gain control over their email deliverability without needing deep technical expertise.
For larger enterprises and Managed Service Providers (MSPs), DMARCPal's scalability and multi-domain management capabilities make it a strong contender. MSPs, in particular, will find it helpful for managing DMARC for multiple clients efficiently.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is almost exclusively for organizations that already have a significant investment in Splunk. It's ideal for enterprise environments where DMARC data needs to be integrated into an existing Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) or broader security operations center (SOC) workflow.
SMBs are generally not a good fit due to the cost and complexity of a Splunk deployment. MSPs might consider it if their core offering is built around Splunk for their clients, but the lack of dedicated support and the archived status present considerable risks for a service provider.

How does DMARCPal compare with Splunk TA-DMARC add-on?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When assessing DMARCPal, one notable drawback is the lack of public reviews on platforms like G2, making it difficult to gauge widespread user satisfaction or common pain points from a community perspective. Additionally, the specific pricing details for their paid plans are not immediately transparent, which can be a hurdle for budgeting and comparison. For the Splunk TA-DMARC add-on, the primary concerns revolve around its archived and unsupported status, meaning no active development or official support. This places a significant burden on users to maintain and troubleshoot it, and its reliance on a full Splunk deployment adds considerable cost and complexity.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARCPal offers tiered pricing with a 14-day free trial, while the Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is free, but requires a pre-existing Splunk instance which comes with its own substantial costs.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (requires Splunk)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (requires Splunk)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (requires Splunk)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (requires Splunk)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCPal or Splunk TA-DMARC add-on?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions