Suped

DMARCly vs Splunk TA-DMARC add-on

Choose DMARCly for comprehensive features, choose Splunk for integration into an existing Splunk environment.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly provides a robust and all-encompassing suite of DMARC reporting and management features. We found its dashboard to be quite comprehensive, presenting aggregate and forensic reports with clear visualizations. It excels in automatic subdomain detection, email vendor identification, and IP reputation monitoring, which are crucial for maintaining sender integrity.
Beyond core DMARC, DMARCly includes advanced features like BIMI, MTA-STS/TLS-RPT implementation assistance, and a DMARC/SPF/DKIM checker. We appreciate the integration of domain blocklist monitoring and adaptive blocklist monitoring, which are vital for proactive deliverability management. The platform also offers Safe SPF for managing SPF limits.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is designed to integrate DMARC reporting data directly into an existing Splunk environment. Its primary function is to ingest DMARC aggregate XML reports and transform them into Splunk-searchable data. This means that its feature set is largely dependent on Splunk's capabilities for data analysis, visualization, and alerting.
While the add-on itself is quite lean, focusing purely on data ingestion and normalization, it allows Splunk users to leverage their existing security information and event management (SIEM) infrastructure for DMARC monitoring. We see its value primarily in organizations already heavily invested in Splunk, as it doesn't offer standalone DMARC-specific features like hosted DMARC or BIMI without custom Splunk development.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly offers a clean, intuitive web interface that simplifies DMARC report analysis. From our experience, navigating through its various reports, GeoMaps, and historical data is straightforward. The setup process for DMARC records is guided, making it accessible even for those new to DMARC.
The dashboard provides actionable insights at a glance, highlighting potential issues and offering recommendations. We found the alert configuration easy to manage, ensuring we were promptly notified of any DMARC non-compliance or unusual activity. Overall, the user experience is designed for efficiency and clarity.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on, by nature, requires familiarity with the Splunk platform. Its user experience is inherently tied to Splunk's own interface and query language (SPL). Installing the add-on is a standard Splunk procedure, but configuring data inputs and building dashboards requires Splunk expertise.
For users already proficient in Splunk, integrating DMARC data feels like an extension of their existing workflow. However, for those without a strong Splunk background, the learning curve can be steep. We would classify its user experience as 'Splunk-native,' meaning it's excellent for Splunk users but challenging for others.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly provides structured support channels that scale with its plans. We've experienced their email support and live chat options, finding responses to be timely and informative. The documentation is thorough, covering common setup questions and troubleshooting steps.
For higher-tier plans, live chat is available, offering quicker resolution to urgent issues. This tiered approach ensures that users get appropriate levels of assistance, which is a significant advantage for businesses relying on consistent email deliverability.
A critical point for the Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is its support status. It's explicitly listed as "Not Supported" and "archived." This means there is no official developer support available, which can be a considerable drawback for production environments.
Users are responsible for any troubleshooting, maintenance, or customization. While the open-source nature (MIT License) allows for community contributions, relying on unofficial channels for critical email security infrastructure is a risk we would highlight. We strongly advise considering this lack of support before deployment.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly is highly suitable for a wide range of organizations. For SMBs, its affordable professional and growth plans offer essential DMARC monitoring without overwhelming complexity. For MSPs, the ability to manage multiple domains and users, along with customizable reporting, makes it an attractive option.
Enterprise clients will appreciate its comprehensive features, API access, SSO integration, and scalability to monitor hundreds of domains and millions of messages. Its dedicated focus on DMARC makes it a strong contender for any organization prioritizing email security and deliverability with a managed service.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is best suited for organizations that already have a significant investment in Splunk infrastructure and the internal expertise to manage it. It's ideal for enterprises looking to centralize all their security logs, including DMARC data, within Splunk for correlation with other security events.
It is less suitable for SMBs or MSPs looking for a standalone DMARC solution, as it lacks a user-friendly interface or dedicated support. While technically feasible for MSPs with Splunk expertise, the 'archived' status and lack of support make it a risky choice. We wouldn't recommend it for those who aren't already Splunk power users.

How does DMARCly compare with Splunk TA-DMARC add-on?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering drawbacks, DMARCly's tiered pricing model can lead to unexpected charges if email volume or domain count exceeds plan limits, potentially forcing users into higher-cost plans. For Splunk TA-DMARC, the major drawbacks are its 'archived' and 'not supported' status, meaning no official updates or assistance, which is a significant concern for critical infrastructure.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARCly offers clear, tiered subscription plans based on domain and email volume, whereas Splunk TA-DMARC is free, but its total cost hinges on your existing Splunk licensing and operational expenses.
Logo
Logo
Small
$17.99/month (100k messages)
Free (requires Splunk)
Medium
$17.99/month
Free (requires Splunk)
Large
$69/month
Free (requires Splunk)
Enterprise
$199/month (5M messages), +$8/1M over 5M
Free (requires Splunk)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCly or Splunk TA-DMARC add-on?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions