Suped

DMARCEye vs spfXio

Choose DMARCEye for comprehensive, self-service DMARC management, or spfXio for a fully managed service experience.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCEye presents a strong, self-serve DMARC reporting and analysis platform. Its dashboard provides an intuitive overview of email authentication status, making it straightforward to identify authentication failures and legitimate sending sources. We found its core DMARC report analysis to be quite robust, allowing users to drill down into data for detailed insights.
The platform excels in source detection, helping us pinpoint where our emails are originating. While it offers good reporting capabilities, the focus is largely on DMARC itself, with less emphasis on broader email deliverability aspects like comprehensive blocklist (or blacklist) monitoring or advanced DNS management beyond DMARC, SPF, and DKIM. Its AI-powered monitoring aims to simplify complex data interpretation.
spfXio, on the other hand, positions itself as a managed service, meaning its feature set is less about direct user interaction with a dashboard and more about their team handling the complexities for you. We observed that the core DMARC report management, SPF record management, and DKIM record management are central to their offering, with their team actively making the necessary adjustments.
While their system provides reporting history, the granularity of direct, self-service source and spoof detection might be less visible to the end-user compared to a pure DMARC reporting tool. Their value lies in offloading the entire DMARC implementation and maintenance process, including SPF flattening, rather than providing an extensive array of user-facing tools for deep-dive analysis.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCEye offers a generally user-friendly interface. We found the navigation to be logical, and the dashboards are clean, presenting information clearly without overwhelming the user. Setting up a new domain and configuring DMARC records is a guided process, which is helpful for those new to DMARC.
However, for advanced users looking for highly customizable reports or intricate filtering options, we noticed it sometimes requires a bit of digging. While the "AI-powered monitoring" assists, understanding the underlying DMARC errors can still be challenging for a novice, but this is a common challenge with DMARC itself.
The user experience with spfXio is inherently different due to its managed service model. Our interaction was primarily with their account managers and through the reports they provide, rather than an interactive dashboard for daily use. This means the "ease of use" is excellent because most of the heavy lifting is done by their team.
For organizations preferring a hands-off approach, this is ideal. However, if you are a user who wants to tinker, explore data directly, or have full control over every setting in a self-service portal, you might find the direct platform access and real-time configurability less pronounced compared to dedicated DMARC reporting tools.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCEye provides community support across all plans, with priority support introduced at the "Scale" tier. We found their documentation to be helpful for common queries. For the "Enterprise" tier, they offer 24/7 phone support and a dedicated account manager, signaling a commitment to higher-tier customer needs.
In our experience, the response times for priority support were generally good. The self-service nature of the platform means many questions can be answered by the user, but when direct assistance is needed, it is available, scaling with the chosen plan.
spfXio's support model is integrated into its managed service, with every plan including a dedicated account manager and quarterly (or monthly for Platinum) report reviews. We observed a very personalized approach, as their team proactively manages your DMARC, SPF, and DKIM.
This proactive, hands-on support eliminates the need for users to troubleshoot many issues themselves. While there might be less of a traditional "support ticket" system for self-service queries, the direct line to a dedicated expert is highly valuable, particularly for organizations seeking peace of mind and minimal internal effort.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCEye is well-suited for businesses of all sizes, from small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) who want to take control of their DMARC, up to larger enterprises. Its tiered pricing model makes it accessible. SMBs can benefit from the Basic and Scale plans for straightforward DMARC monitoring and enforcement.
For managed service providers (MSPs), the "Scale" and "Enterprise" plans, with their multi-domain and multi-user features, offer good scalability for managing multiple client domains. Enterprises will appreciate the custom limits, unlimited data history, and dedicated account management, making it a flexible solution for various organizational needs.
spfXio is particularly well-suited for organizations that prefer a fully managed service, where the complexities of email authentication are handled by external experts. This makes it an excellent fit for businesses that lack in-house DMARC expertise or the resources to actively monitor and manage it.
Managed Service Providers (MSPs) could leverage spfXio's services to outsource DMARC management for their clients, essentially becoming a white-label solution, though it is important to clarify their specific MSP-focused offerings. Enterprise clients requiring a hands-off approach and direct account management will find significant value, while SMBs might find the entry price point steeper if they prefer a purely self-service, lower-cost option.

How does DMARCEye compare with spfXio?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCEye, while strong in core DMARC, sometimes leaves the user needing external knowledge for the deeper intricacies of email authentication errors. Its broader email security features, such as advanced blocklist monitoring or comprehensive DNS record management, are not its primary focus. For spfXio, the primary drawback is the cost for organizations preferring a self-service model, as its managed approach inherently carries a higher price tag and less direct control for the end-user.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
A seamless DMARC monitoring experience
What do you like best about DmarcEye? Ease of Use: DMARCeye is engineered with the end-user in mind, making it an ideal choice for those who are not necessarily tech-savvy. What do you dislike about DmarcEye? Sometimes it might be hard to understand DMARC errors, but I guess this is more of a DMARC problem itself. What problems is DmarcEye solving and how is that benefiting you? DMARCeye makes it easy to monitor and understand DMARC reports.
Jan P.
Programmer Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

DMARCEye offers a more granular, self-service pricing structure based on domains, while spfXio provides a higher-cost, comprehensive managed service with pricing based on email request limits and domains.
Logo
Logo
Small
$5.00/month (1 domain, billed annually)
$299/month (up to 25k DMARC reports, up to 3 domains)
Medium
$4.00/domain/month (2-50 domains, billed annually)
$299/month (up to 25k DMARC reports, up to 3 domains) or $499/month (up to 50k DMARC reports, up to 3 domains)
Large
$4.00/domain/month (2-50 domains, billed annually)
$499/month (up to 50k DMARC reports, up to 3 domains)
Enterprise
From $300/month (50+ domains)
Contact for pricing (Custom limits)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCEye or spfXio?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions