DMARCEye vs.
OnDMARC in 2026
DMARCEye
OnDMARC
vs.
We tested DMARCEye and OnDMARC for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. DMARCEye was faster for clean sender inventory and pricing clarity. OnDMARC was stronger when hosted SPF, MTA-STS, and a structured enforcement path mattered.
DMARCEye
DMARC reporting for SMBs and agencies
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Lean teams that want fast sender visibility
In one line
DMARCEye gave us a readable sender inventory quickly, but policy movement stayed more manual once DNS changes were needed.
OnDMARC
Enterprise DMARC enforcement
Starts at
From $9 / month
Best fit
Organizations that need hosted DNS controls
In one line
OnDMARC gave us broader hosted controls, while Suped is a compact benchmark when guided fixes and published starter pricing matter.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
The short version: pick speed or control
Pick DMARCEye if
DMARCEye fits lean teams that need quick DMARC reporting
We added all three domains quickly and saw first aggregate data without a heavy setup path.
Microsoft 365, SendGrid, and Mailchimp were easy to separate in the source view.
The parked domain spoof sample stood out clearly because normal traffic stayed close to zero.
Free plan available
Pick OnDMARC if
OnDMARC fits teams that need hosted controls and enforcement structure
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS helped us turn findings into DNS changes during the test.
The forwarded-mail SPF failure was easier to explain to a non-specialist DNS owner.
Enterprise onboarding made policy movement more deliberate across the three domains.
From $9 / month
Consider Suped if
Suped fits teams that want guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Guided fixes should map each failed sender to a DNS or vendor-owner action.
Automated issue detection should separate real drift from one-off forwarded mail.
MSP workflows should keep client separation tied to reusable handoff notes.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
DMARCEye
OnDMARC
Suped
DMARC report analysis
How quickly raw aggregate reports become useful operator views.
Clear by sender and domain
Deeper drilldowns and Investigate
Supported
Source detection
Ability to map traffic to services and owners.
Fast for Microsoft 365 and SendGrid
Strong for Google Workspace and Mailchimp
Supported
Forward detection
Whether forwarded mail is separated from real authentication failure.
Manual workflow for SPF failures
Explained forwarded SPF failure
Supported
Spoof detection
Whether unauthorized use of the domain is easy to isolate.
Clear on parked domain
Clearer risk context
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Noise control and routing for operational alerts.
Smart alerts on paid tier
Smart alerts plus Event Hub
Supported
Reporting
Recurring reports, exports, and stakeholder-ready summaries.
Exports were quick but plain
Detailed reports needed filtering
Supported
API
Programmatic access for operations or reporting workflows.
API on Scale
REST API listed
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Client separation, account grouping, and delegated access.
Agency only
Role controls, grouping effort
Supported
SPF flattening
Managed handling of SPF lookup limits.
Not supported
Dynamic SPF
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Ability to manage DMARC records through the platform.
Reporting only in our test
Dynamic DMARC
Supported
Hosted SPF
Hosted SPF record management for lookup and change control.
Not supported
Dynamic SPF
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted policy support for transport security records.
Not supported
Dynamic Services
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blacklist and blocklist monitoring for domain or IP risk.
Blacklist/blocklist monitoring included
Reputation coverage unclear
Blacklist and blocklist checks
Automatic issue detection
Whether the platform flags new authentication problems without manual review.
AI monitoring and alerts
Automated recommendations
Supported
AI copilot
AI help for interpreting authentication issues and next actions.
AI monitoring, not policy editing
Radar AI on higher tiers
Supported
DNS monitoring
Monitoring for DNS record drift and related domain changes.
Not tested
DNS Guardian on Premier
Supported
Self hostable
Whether the product can run on customer-managed infrastructure.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
Free access before a paid commitment.
Free plan and 14-day trial
14-day trial
Free plan and trial
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric after the same 90-day setup, the same three domains, and the same controlled authentication cases. Higher is better in every row, and a missing capability gets a 0.0.
DMARCEye wins on speed and price clarity. OnDMARC wins on managed enforcement controls.
DMARCEye scored higher where the job was fast source resolution, simple onboarding, blacklist and blocklist monitoring, and public pricing. OnDMARC scored higher where the job required hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, support handoff, and a structured path to reject. The biggest tradeoff was operational depth: OnDMARC handled more of the DNS control plane, while DMARCEye kept the reporting workflow lighter.
DMARCEye score
63/100
OnDMARC score
68.5/100
DMARCEye
63/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
6.5
Source resolution
7.5
Setup and onboarding
8.5
MSP workflows
5.5
Alerting and integrations
6.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
7.0
Pricing transparency
8.5
Time to enforcement
6.5
OnDMARC
68.5/100
DMARC enforcement
8.5
Customer support
8.5
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
6.5
Alerting and integrations
8.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
9.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
4.5
Time to enforcement
8.0
Feature set
Reporting clarity vs hosted controls
OnDMARC has the broader control surface. DMARCEye has quicker reporting clarity.
OnDMARC won the feature set round because its hosted DNS controls gave us more direct paths to fix records after the Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace checks. DMARCEye was faster at making SendGrid, Mailchimp, and support desk traffic readable, with less menu work. For Suped, the buying criterion is guided fixes with automated issue detection, because accurate reports still left owner assignment work.
DMARCEye
Microsoft 365 grouped quickly
Mailchimp DKIM easy to verify
Unknown sender surfaced separately
OnDMARC
Hosted SPF fixes records
Spoof sample context was clear
Google Workspace drilldowns were deeper
DMARCEye grouped Microsoft 365 and SendGrid correctly within the first reporting window and made Mailchimp's DKIM pass on the marketing subdomain easy to verify. The unknown sender appeared as a separate source with enough IP and header context for classification, but the forwarded-mail SPF failure remained a manual explanation instead of a guided exception path.
OnDMARC connected Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, SendGrid, and Mailchimp cleanly, then pushed us toward hosted record management when an SPF pass used a mismatched visible From domain. Its Investigate view gave better context for the unauthorized spoof sample and the DKIM pass on a subdomain, although the first pass took more clicks than DMARCEye.
User experience
Control vs guidance
DMARCEye feels faster. OnDMARC explains enforcement better.
DMARCEye gave us a cleaner first week because the three domains were visible quickly and the sender list stayed compact. OnDMARC required more orientation, but it gave better context when we explained why forwarded mail failed SPF and still passed the broader DMARC review.
DMARCEye
Three domains visible fast
Unknown sender easy to find
Forwarding needed manual notes
OnDMARC
More setup questions
Forwarding explanation was stronger
Spoof risk surfaced clearly
Adding the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain took 24 minutes including DNS TXT checks. The unknown sender was easy to find because the source view sorted by authentication outcome and volume, but the forwarded SPF failure had to be written up manually for the support desk owner.
OnDMARC's onboarding asked more questions about domain role, sender ownership, and enforcement intent, so the first setup took 41 minutes. The tradeoff paid off when the forwarded mail case showed clearer failure context and the parked domain spoof sample sat in a more obvious risk view.
Support
Self serve vs guided help
OnDMARC has stronger assisted onboarding. DMARCEye suits lighter handoff.
DMARCEye support fit a self-serve buyer that needs clear docs and occasional escalation. OnDMARC fit teams that expect implementation help, account reviews, and escalation paths for enterprise DNS decisions.
DMARCEye
DNS handoff was clean
Escalation notes were manual
Good for self-serve admins
OnDMARC
Implementation path was clearer
Enterprise approval flow helped
Support handoff required less rewriting
For DMARCEye, the DNS handoff was clean enough for a single admin to complete without a call: each domain showed the rua record, status, and last-seen report time. When we staged the unauthorized spoof sample, the alert pointed to the source view, but escalation relied on our own notes and screenshots.
OnDMARC felt more service-led during setup. The enterprise onboarding path made it clearer who should approve hosted SPF and MTA-STS changes, and the support handoff template helped us explain the SPF mismatch case to a DNS owner without rewriting the technical detail.
Suitability
Operator fit vs enterprise fit
DMARCEye fits lean teams. OnDMARC fits governed programs.
DMARCEye is the better fit when one team owns a small domain set and needs a fast read on senders. OnDMARC is the better fit when hosted SPF, formal reviews, and enterprise approval paths matter. For Suped, the comparable buying test is MSP workflow depth and alert quality, especially when recurring client reports matter.
DMARCEye
Best for lean domain sets
Exports need handoff notes
Agency tier for multi-tenancy
OnDMARC
Best for governed programs
Domain grouping needs planning
Enterprise handoff is stronger
DMARCEye worked well for the SMB pattern in our test: one corporate domain, one marketing subdomain, and one parked domain owned by a small security or IT team. Account separation was the limiting factor; recurring reporting was easy to export, but client handoff for MSP use needed extra context outside the product.
OnDMARC fit the enterprise pattern better because role controls, domain grouping, and scheduled review material gave each owner a clearer place in the process. For MSP use, we liked the depth of reporting, but grouping domains by client took more planning than a purpose-built client workspace.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
DMARCEye
Best for lean teams that want fast DMARC reporting
After 90 days, DMARCEye felt like the faster daily console. Microsoft 365 and SendGrid were classified early, Mailchimp on the marketing subdomain stayed easy to inspect, and the parked domain spoof sample stood out because normal traffic was almost zero.
Where it slowed us down was remediation ownership. The SPF pass with visible From mismatch and forwarded-mail SPF failure both produced enough evidence, but we still had to decide the fix path and write the owner handoff ourselves.
Where it wins
Fast sender inventory
Clean low-volume parked-domain view
Public low-entry pricing
Blacklist/blocklist monitoring included
Where it lags
No hosted SPF in test
Policy movement stayed manual
MSP separation needs Agency
Forwarding explanation needed notes
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
24 minutes for three domains
G2 rating
4.8 / 5
OnDMARC
Best for organizations that need hosted controls and guided enforcement
After 90 days, OnDMARC felt like the more complete enforcement workspace. Hosted SPF and MTA-STS mattered once we tested Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, SendGrid, and Mailchimp together, because the platform kept pointing us back to record changes rather than report review alone.
The cost of that depth was orientation. The unknown sender took longer to isolate on day one, domain grouping needed more planning, and some exports required filtering before they were ready for a stakeholder update.
Where it wins
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
Clear enforcement path
Strong enterprise support handoff
Good forwarded-mail context
Where it lags
Higher tiers lack public pricing
Interface took longer to learn
Client grouping needed planning
Exports needed filtering
Pricing
From $9 / month
Free tier
14-day trial
Onboarding
41 minutes for three domains
G2 rating
4.8 / 5
Pricing
DMARCEye
OnDMARC
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free covers 1 domain and 5,000 tracked emails each month.
$9 / month
Express starts at this annual-billing price and covers up to 4 domains.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$8 / month
Scale pricing is $4 per domain per month when billed annually.
$9 / month
Express covers this domain and volume profile under the public limits.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$40 / month
Estimated from public Scale annual pricing, assuming 10 active domain slots.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
This profile moves beyond Express into a higher tier without a public current price.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
From $84 / month
Estimated for 21 Scale domains; Agency pricing applies above 50 domains or custom limits.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Enterprise and Premier tiers list capabilities publicly, but not current prices.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
DMARCEye Small and Medium figures use public list pricing, while Large and Enterprise are estimates using the public $4 per domain per month annual Scale rate. OnDMARC Express pricing is the public annual list price; higher-tier prices were not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Fix ownership gaps
DMARCEye gave us clear evidence for the SPF mismatch and forwarded-mail failure, but the owner handoff still lived outside the workflow. Suped ties failed sources to guided fixes so DNS and vendor owners get the next action.
Reduce enterprise noise
OnDMARC gave us deep views, but the first week produced more data than a smaller team needed. Suped's alerting focuses on authentication changes, new senders, and spoof attempts so routine DMARC noise stays out of the queue.
Handle MSP handoff cleanly
Both tools needed planning for client-style separation during our three-domain test. Suped's MSP workflow keeps client domains tied to recurring reports and handoff notes.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from DMARCEye or OnDMARC?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
