DMARC Digests by Postmark focuses on delivering straightforward DMARC reporting. It provides core DMARC report analysis, giving us visibility into mail sources and helping to distinguish between legitimate and fraudulent sending activity. It's a no-frills tool designed for clarity.
We found that its strength lies in offering essential DMARC insights without overwhelming us with complexity. It tracks 60 days of DMARC history and offers actionable guidance, making it a good choice for those who need a direct approach to DMARC monitoring.
OnDMARC offers an extensive suite of features, including Dynamic Services for DMARC, SPF, DKIM, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI. Its Investigate tool is particularly useful for deep diagnostics, helping us instantly diagnose deliverability issues.
We appreciate features like Radar Pro seats and Event Hub, which point to advanced security and logging capabilities, enabling comprehensive monitoring and management of complex email ecosystems. It definitely supports more intricate DMARC enforcement scenarios.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
DMARC Digests by Postmark offers a very simple and intuitive interface. Its setup is straightforward, making it ideal for users who are new to DMARC or prefer a minimalist approach. The platform is designed to present essential information clearly and concisely.
We found that its minimalist design helps us quickly grasp the DMARC compliance status and take necessary action without getting bogged down in complex menus or an excessive amount of data. It's built for efficiency and ease of understanding.
OnDMARC provides a user-friendly dashboard that simplifies managing multiple domains and DMARC traces. Its guided workflows are effective in assisting users to move confidently towards DMARC enforcement.
While powerful, some users have noted that the GUI can sometimes feel a bit clunky or overwhelming initially due to the sheer volume of features and data available. We agree that it presents a steeper learning curve, but it's often deemed worthwhile for its advanced functionality.
Which product has the best support
Support
DMARC Digests by Postmark emphasizes friendly human support and actionable guidance. This suggests a direct and personal approach to helping users resolve their DMARC related issues.
Their support model focuses on providing clear, step-by-step assistance for DMARC problems, ensuring that users can effectively navigate their compliance journey with expert help.
OnDMARC receives high praise for its responsive and knowledgeable customer support. This includes dedicated account managers and regular check-ins, actively guiding users through implementation and ongoing management.
They offer various support channels, from email to chat and phone support in higher tiers. Features like compliance programming and custom SLAs are also available, indicating a robust and multi-faceted support system that can cater to complex organizational needs.
Who should use each product
Suitability
DMARC Digests by Postmark is best suited for SMBs or organizations with a limited number of domains that require basic, reliable DMARC monitoring. Its simplicity and a fixed per-domain pricing model make it quite accessible for smaller operations.
It is less ideal for MSPs or enterprise clients that require advanced features like multi-tenancy, deep integrations, or forensic reporting. DMARC Digests excels at core DMARC enforcement without offering the extensive enterprise-grade functionalities.
OnDMARC is ideal for growing organizations, mid-market businesses, and enterprise clients with multiple domains, high email volume, and complex email ecosystems. Its comprehensive features, including dynamic SPF and forensic reporting, cater to sophisticated security needs. MSPs would particularly appreciate its multi-tenancy capabilities and advanced features for managing client domains.
Its tiered pricing, robust feature set, and extensive support position it as a strong contender for organizations that prioritize in-depth email security, compliance, and detailed insights over a minimal feature set. It's built to handle scale and complexity.
How does DMARC Digests by Postmark compare with OnDMARC?
DMARC report analysis
Analysis of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Source detection
Ability to identify all email sending sources for your domain.
Forward detection
Detection of email forwarding that might affect DMARC alignment.
Spoof detection
Identification of spoofing (or email impersonation) attempts against your domain.
Notifications and alerts
Automated alerts for DMARC policy changes or suspicious activity.
Basic email alerts
Smart alerts available in Essentials/Premier
Reporting
Comprehensive dashboards and data retention for DMARC reports.
Clear DMARC history (60 days) and visibility
Forensic reporting, detailed dashboards, longer data history
API
Programmatic access to DMARC data and platform features.
Not mentioned
RESTful API access in Essentials/Premier
Multi-tenancy
Capability to manage multiple domains or client accounts from a single interface.
No explicit mention
User permissioning for access to specific domains in Premier plan
SPF flattening
Feature to overcome the 10-DNS lookup limit for SPF records.
Not mentioned
Dynamic SPF to manage lookups (Unlimited in Essentials/Premier)
Hosted DMARC
Option to host DMARC (and other authentication) records via the platform.
Not mentioned
Dynamic Services for DMARC, SPF, DKIM
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).
Not mentioned
Supported with Dynamic Services, VMC in Premier
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security (MTA-STS) and TLS Reporting.
Not mentioned
Supported with Dynamic Services
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring of blocklists (or blacklist) and domain reputation.
Not mentioned
Brand reputation monitoring, DNS Guardian
AI copilot
AI-powered assistance for DMARC management and insights.
Not mentioned
Radar Pro seats, RADAR AI for threat detection
DNS monitoring
Monitoring of DNS records for changes or issues.
Not mentioned
DNS History, DNS Guardian, DNS changes monitoring
Self hostable
Option to host the software on your own infrastructure.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free trial or a permanently free usage tier.
14-day free trial
Free trial available, Express plan for small organizations
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
DMARC Digests by Postmark, while simple and effective for core DMARC, lacks the advanced features, longer data retention, and scalability that larger organizations often require. Its fixed per-domain pricing can also become a drawback as domain portfolios grow, pushing costs up significantly for more extensive usage. OnDMARC, on the other hand, can be quite overwhelming initially due to its comprehensive feature set and sometimes clunky GUI. While it offers powerful forensic reporting, some users have noted a need for better auto-triaging or anomaly detection within these reports, indicating room for improvement in user-friendly insights.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
0 / 5(0)
4.9 / 5(94)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Great for Managing Multiple DMAC Traces, Needs Auto-Triage for Forensic Reports
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?
Managing multiple DMARC traces has become much simpler. By enabling BIMI, we were able to significantly reduce our key risks with both customers and partners.
What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?
There is a need for automatic triaging of forensic reports, along with notifications if any anomalies are detected.
What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
BIMI helps our customers and partners recognize phishing scams more easily.
Verified User in Retail
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Dynamic SPF and Powerful Features, GUI Could Use Improvement
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?
I have been using Red Sift OnDMARC for over three years for monitoring DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across multiple domains, which would be difficult to manage without such a tool. It offers the ease of dynamic SPF and dynamic DMARC, which simplify complex monitoring tasks. The software provides a powerful set of features, making any initial setup challenges worthwhile. I especially value the single pane of glass interface as an IT administrator managing domains that engineers use, allowing me to track domain usage, detect spam issues, and dynamically update DMARC, DKIM, and SPF with ease. The dynamic SPF and DMARC/DKIM reports are integral for my operations, as they save considerable time by turning potentially lengthy tasks into several-minute jobs. Furthermore, the friendliness and support from our account manager, alongside our quarterly meetings, enhance the overall experience and decision to continue using the platform.
What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?
I find the GUI a little bit difficult to navigate sometimes and a bit clunky, which sometimes makes it hard to find what I want.
What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use the product to monitor DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across domains, simplifying updates and detecting spam issues with ease. It turns lengthy tasks into minutes, providing a comprehensive view of domain usage and security.
Brice P.
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC implementation with great visibility
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?
OnDMARC makes it very easy to set up and maintain DMARC records. The guided workflows and clear reporting helped us move from monitoring to full enforcement confidently. The user interface is intuitive, and support is very responsive whenever we have questions.
What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?
It would be helpful if some of the reporting dashboards allowed more customization or export options. Sometimes, the volume of daily reports can feel overwhelming without filtering.
What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is helping us prevent domain spoofing and phishing attacks by enforcing DMARC policies. It has also improved visibility into who is sending emails on behalf of our domain, so we can take quick action if needed. Overall, it has strengthened our email security posture and improved trust in our communications.
Shashi K.
SR Manager IT Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
It is quite a useful tool to manage SPF/DKIM/DMARC records and understand it's impact on the domain.
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?
The ease of using the application and the UI that is provides that helps in managing the records of the domain. Plus the customer service for the tool is quite responsive.
What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?
The limitation of the feature of MTA-STS, in which it reports only a few of the domains.
What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps us in getting a clearer picture of the use case of our domain, plus the acceptance and the rejection rate.
Ashman B.
CyberSecurity Analyst Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC setup
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?
We have had OnDMARC for several years, we onboarded all of our managed domains over the past 12months. It was very easy adding SPF, DKIM records and moving DMARC to 100% Reject. We had support from Red Sift all the way.
What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?
Sometimes the dashboard is misleading, i had moved a domain to reject 50% and the dashboard didn't reflect that. but customer support fixed that very quickly
What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
Securing our domains to bring them up to 100% Reject
Verified User in Law Practice
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Pricing
DMARC Digests by Postmark offers a single, simple per-domain pricing model, while OnDMARC provides tiered plans with a more accessible entry point for lower volumes but requires contacting sales for enterprise-level needs.