Suped

Centera DMARC Compliance vs Splunk TA-DMARC add-on

Choose Centera for a dedicated DMARC platform, or Splunk TA-DMARC for integration into your Splunk environment.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Centera DMARC Compliance provides a robust, purpose-built platform for DMARC reporting and management. We found its feature set to be comprehensive, covering the core requirements for DMARC enforcement with a focus on ease of use. It includes detailed aggregate and forensic report analysis, helping users visualize DMARC data effectively.
Key functionalities we observed include automated source identification, robust spoof detection, and clear insights into legitimate email streams versus potential threats. It aims to simplify the journey to DMARC enforcement with a structured approach to data interpretation.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on, in contrast, is designed to integrate DMARC data directly into an existing Splunk environment. Its features are centered around parsing and ingesting DMARC aggregate XML reports into Splunk, allowing Splunk's powerful search and dashboard capabilities to be applied to DMARC data.
While it doesn't offer the same out-of-the-box dedicated DMARC specific visualizations as a standalone platform, it provides the building blocks for Splunk users to create their own dashboards and alerts. We appreciated the flexibility it offers for those already deeply invested in the Splunk ecosystem for their security information and event management (SIEM) needs.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Centera DMARC Compliance offers a clean, intuitive user interface that we found straightforward to navigate. The dashboards present DMARC data in an easily digestible format, with clear graphs and summaries. It's designed for users who may not be DMARC experts, guiding them through the enforcement process with contextual information and recommendations.
We particularly liked the guided setup and the visual cues that help identify potential issues quickly. For organizations looking for a dedicated DMARC solution, the user experience is generally positive, focusing on simplifying complex DMARC concepts.
The user experience for Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is inherently tied to the Splunk platform itself. For experienced Splunk users, integrating and manipulating DMARC data is a natural extension of their existing workflow. We found that deploying the add-on and configuring data inputs within Splunk was relatively easy if you're already familiar with Splunk's operational nuances.
However, for those new to Splunk, there's a steep learning curve not just for DMARC but for the entire Splunk environment. The add-on provides the raw data, but the creation of insightful dashboards and alerts requires Splunk knowledge and potentially custom SPL (Splunk Processing Language) queries, which can be a significant investment of time and expertise.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Centera DMARC Compliance provides dedicated customer support channels, which typically include email, ticketing systems, and sometimes phone support, depending on the service tier. We expect that a commercial, purpose-built DMARC platform like Centera offers structured support to assist with setup, troubleshooting, and DMARC policy progression.
Access to expert guidance on DMARC implementation and issue resolution is a significant advantage, especially for organizations navigating complex email ecosystems. The expectation is that they will assist in interpreting reports and making policy decisions.
Support for the Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is a critical distinction. The add-on is officially listed as 'Not Supported' and 'archived' on Splunkbase. This means there is no official vendor support from Splunk or the original developer. Users are left to rely on community forums, their internal Splunk experts, or third-party consultants.
While the Splunk community can be helpful, the lack of official support presents a notable risk, especially for mission-critical DMARC deployment. We strongly advise users to factor this into their decision, as any issues encountered would require significant internal resources or external (unsupported) expertise to resolve.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Centera DMARC Compliance is well-suited for a broad range of organizations, from SMBs to large enterprises, seeking a dedicated and user-friendly DMARC reporting and enforcement solution. Its guided approach makes it accessible for teams without deep DMARC expertise.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), Centera could offer a streamlined way to manage DMARC for multiple clients, potentially with multi-tenancy features and centralized reporting. Its dedicated nature simplifies the DMARC journey, making it ideal for those who want a focused tool rather than integrating DMARC into a broader platform.
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is specifically best for organizations that are already heavily invested in Splunk and have dedicated Splunk administrators or security analysts. It's a natural fit for enterprises that want to consolidate their DMARC data within their existing SIEM or logging infrastructure, leveraging Splunk's powerful analytics capabilities.
It's less suitable for SMBs or MSPs who might not have the Splunk infrastructure or the specialized expertise required to deploy, configure, and maintain the add-on, especially given its 'Not Supported' status. While free, the total cost of ownership can be high due to the Splunk license and the need for in-house expertise.

How does Centera DMARC Compliance compare with Splunk TA-DMARC add-on?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Centera DMARC Compliance, while a dedicated solution, might represent a higher upfront cost compared to open-source or free add-ons, and its specific pricing details are not publicly transparent. Splunk TA-DMARC add-on, on the other hand, comes with the significant drawback of being 'Not Supported' and 'archived,' meaning no official updates or assistance, posing a considerable risk for long-term reliability and security.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Centera DMARC Compliance requires direct contact for pricing details, while the Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is free but necessitates an existing Splunk license.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free add-on (Splunk costs apply)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free add-on (Splunk costs apply)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free add-on (Splunk costs apply)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free add-on (Splunk costs apply)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Centera DMARC Compliance or Splunk TA-DMARC add-on?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Centera DMARC Compliance vs Splunk TA-DMARC add-on DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped