Summary
Google's sophisticated email systems inherently perform detailed authentication checks, specifically SPF and DKIM, on all incoming mail, even if a domain lacks an explicit DMARC record. When emails fail these foundational authentication mechanisms, or if the 'From' header domain does not align with the authenticated domains, Google interprets this as a lack of proper authentication. Since DMARC formalizes and enforces these very alignment checks, the resulting display messages or warnings from Google, such as 'via' tags or 'unauthenticated email' alerts, conceptually reflect the issues DMARC is designed to prevent, effectively appearing as 'DMARC alignment messages' due to underlying authentication problems that compromise trust in the sender.
Key findings
- Inherent Authentication Checks: Google's email systems independently perform robust SPF and DKIM authentication checks on all incoming mail, regardless of whether a DMARC record is explicitly published for the sending domain.
- SPF and DKIM Failure Triggers Warnings: If an email's SPF or DKIM records are missing, misconfigured, or if the domain in the 'From' header does not align with the authenticated domains, Google will flag the email as unauthenticated, leading to user-facing warnings.
- DMARC Builds on Existing Protocols: DMARC builds upon and formalizes SPF and DKIM. Therefore, the issues Google identifies through its fundamental authentication checks directly mirror the types of failures DMARC is designed to detect and prevent through alignment.
- User Protection as a Goal: Google displays these warnings to protect users from spoofing and phishing attempts, identifying emails that lack proper authentication and thus appear untrustworthy, even if a DMARC policy isn't explicitly defined.
- Bulk Sender Requirement Context: As of February 2024, Google requires bulk senders to have a DMARC policy, even if it's set to 'p=none', further underscoring their commitment to authenticated email and the underlying checks that support DMARC.
Key considerations
- Prioritize SPF and DKIM: Ensure your SPF and DKIM records are correctly set up and configured for all sending domains. These are the foundational authentication protocols that Google always checks.
- Understand Alignment: Recognize that Google checks for domain alignment between your email's 'From' header and the domains authenticated by SPF and DKIM. This alignment is a core principle DMARC enforces, even without a formal DMARC policy in place.
- Monitor Postmaster Tools: Utilize Google Postmaster Tools to gain insights into your domain's authentication performance, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC status. This platform can help identify underlying issues contributing to unauthenticated messages.
- Google's Sensitivity: Be aware of Google's high sensitivity to authentication details, such as DKIM signature order, strict ADKIM, or double DKIM signing, as these nuances can impact how authentication is perceived.
- Implement DMARC: While Google performs underlying authentication checks, implementing a DMARC policy provides formal instructions to receiving servers on how to handle unauthenticated mail, further strengthening your deliverability and reputation, especially for bulk senders.
What email marketers say
9 marketer opinions
Google's advanced mail systems conduct thorough authentication evaluations, including SPF and DKIM checks, for all incoming emails. These checks occur irrespective of whether a DMARC record is published for the sending domain. When an email's SPF or DKIM records are absent, misconfigured, or if the 'From' header domain does not align with the authenticated domains, Google flags it as unauthenticated. This lack of proper authentication, which DMARC is designed to formalize and enforce through alignment, triggers internal warnings or user-facing messages from Google, such as 'via' tags or 'unauthenticated email' alerts. Essentially, Google displays these indicators because the underlying authentication integrity, foundational to DMARC, is compromised, reflecting a lack of trustworthiness even without an explicit DMARC policy.
Key opinions
- Independent Authentication Checks: Google's highly advanced email infrastructure proactively performs robust SPF and DKIM authentication checks on all incoming mail, regardless of whether a DMARC record is explicitly published for the sending domain.
- Authentication & Alignment Failures Trigger Warnings: If an email's SPF or DKIM records are missing, misconfigured, or if the domain in the 'From' header does not align with the authenticated domains, Google will flag the email as unauthenticated, leading to user-facing warnings or 'via' tags.
- DMARC Principles Applied Independently: Google's internal heuristics and security protocols identify the same types of authentication and alignment issues that DMARC is designed to formally address, causing these warnings to appear conceptually DMARC-related.
- Protection Against Spoofing: The display of these messages is driven by Google's commitment to protecting users from spoofing and phishing by identifying and flagging emails that lack proper authentication and thus appear untrustworthy.
- Google's Sensitivity to DKIM Nuances: Google is particularly sensitive to specific technical details such as subdomain signing, strict ADKIM, and the order of DKIM signatures, which can all influence how authentication is perceived and impact deliverability.
Key considerations
- Verify SPF and DKIM: Consistently ensure the correct setup and configuration of your SPF and DKIM records. These are the foundational authentication protocols Google always checks, even without DMARC.
- Focus on Domain Alignment: Understand that Google validates the alignment between your email's 'From' header domain and your SPF and DKIM authenticated domains. This is a core DMARC principle that Google enforces independently.
- Address DKIM Specifics: Pay attention to Google's heightened sensitivity regarding DKIM configuration, including subdomain signing, strict ADKIM, and DKIM signature order, as these can significantly impact authentication results.
- Monitor Deliverability Metrics: Regularly check your domain's performance through tools like Google Postmaster Tools to gain insights into your authentication status and identify underlying issues contributing to unauthenticated messages.
- Consider DMARC Implementation: While Google performs underlying authentication checks, implementing a DMARC policy formalizes your authentication posture, provides reporting, and instructs receiving servers on how to handle unauthenticated mail, further strengthening your deliverability and reputation.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks shares that she has also seen Google's DMARC messages not matching headers and suggests checking for subdomain signing, strict ADKIM, or double DKIM signing, noting Google's sensitivity to DKIM signature order.
9 Apr 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that Google's DMARC message appears when DMARC is not present or does not pass, regardless of alignment, and provides a reference blog post about Google's alignment and DMARC.
9 May 2024 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
2 expert opinions
Google's mail systems are designed to continuously evaluate email authentication, including the alignment principles central to DMARC, regardless of whether a DMARC record is explicitly published for a domain. When a DMARC record is not found, or if authentication fails, Google still meticulously extracts and processes details from existing SPF and DKIM authentication results. This continuous evaluation means that DMARC-related data, including alignment status, is perpetually generated. Consequently, platforms like Google Postmaster Tools are able to report on a domain's DMARC status, even if only to indicate the absence of a policy or to highlight underlying authentication issues, which users perceive as 'DMARC alignment messages'.
Key opinions
- DMARC Evaluation Is Constant: Google's email infrastructure consistently assesses DMARC-relevant outcomes, actively seeking a DMARC=pass result even if no explicit DMARC record is published.
- Data Extraction from Auth Results: In the absence of a DMARC record or upon DMARC failure, Google's systems are designed to extract specific details from SPF and DKIM authentication results.
- DMARC Report Generation: DMARC reports, which include crucial alignment data, are generated by receiving mail servers and are accessible, even when a formal DMARC record is not published for a domain.
- Postmaster Tools Reporting: Google Postmaster Tools and similar platforms will process and display DMARC status, including reporting on the absence of a DMARC policy, which functions as an 'alignment message' for users.
- Underlying Auth Drives Perceived DMARC Status: The messages users see are a direct reflection of Google's analysis of underlying SPF and DKIM authentication, which forms the basis for DMARC's alignment checks.
Key considerations
- Beyond Explicit Records: Recognize that Google's systems are always evaluating the underlying authentication mechanisms that DMARC formalizes, even without an explicit DMARC record.
- Utilize Reporting Tools: Leverage Google Postmaster Tools. It provides valuable insights into your domain's authentication performance and DMARC status, even if you haven't published a DMARC record.
- Absence is a Status: Understand that the lack of a DMARC record or a DMARC policy is itself a status that Google's systems will report on and interpret.
- Foundational Authentication: Prioritize robust SPF and DKIM implementation. These protocols are continuously evaluated by Google and directly contribute to the perceived 'DMARC alignment' status.
- Publish DMARC for Clarity: While Google reports on underlying authentication, publishing a DMARC record, even with a 'p=none' policy, provides explicit instructions and enhances the clarity of your domain's authentication posture.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks clarifies that Google's message appears when no DMARC record is found or DMARC fails, because Google specifically seeks a DMARC=pass result and, if not present, extracts details from authentication results. She also provides a link to an updated blog post on Google's alignment.
15 May 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that DMARC reports, which contain alignment data, are generated and can be viewed even when a DMARC record is not published. This means that Google Postmaster Tools or similar systems will still process and report on the DMARC status, including the absence of a DMARC policy, which can be perceived as an 'alignment message' or status report.
18 Feb 2023 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
Even without an explicit DMARC record, Google's robust email infrastructure consistently conducts fundamental authentication checks, specifically SPF and DKIM, on all incoming mail. When these underlying authentication mechanisms fail, or if the 'From' header domain does not properly align with the authenticated domains, Google's systems interpret this as a lack of sender trustworthiness. The resulting warnings, such as 'via' tags or 'unauthenticated email' alerts, are Google's way of highlighting issues that DMARC is specifically designed to formalize and enforce through its alignment checks, thus appearing as 'DMARC alignment messages' to users. This proactive approach underscores Google's broader commitment to email security, especially with the new DMARC requirement for bulk senders as of February 2024.
Key findings
- Universal Authentication Checks: Google's email systems inherently perform SPF and DKIM authentication for all incoming mail, regardless of a domain's DMARC record status.
- Authentication Failures Trigger Warnings: If an email's underlying SPF or DKIM checks fail, or if domain alignment is absent, Google will flag the message as unauthenticated, displaying warnings to users.
- DMARC Principles Are Inherent: The issues Google identifies, such as lack of authentication and alignment, are the very problems DMARC is designed to formalize and prevent.
- Protection Against Untrustworthy Mail: Google displays these messages primarily to protect users from spoofing and phishing by clearly identifying emails that lack proper authentication and thus appear untrustworthy.
- Bulk Sender Requirement Underscores Importance: Google's mandate for bulk senders to have a DMARC policy, even a 'p=none' one, highlights the company's escalating focus on formal email authentication and trust.
Key considerations
- Solidify SPF and DKIM Setup: Ensure your SPF and DKIM records are correctly configured and maintained, as these are the foundational authentication protocols Google always checks.
- Grasp Domain Alignment Concepts: Understand that Google scrutinizes the alignment between your 'From' header domain and your authenticated SPF and DKIM domains, a core DMARC principle that impacts deliverability.
- Leverage Postmaster Tools for Insights: Utilize Google Postmaster Tools to monitor your domain's authentication performance, including insights into SPF, DKIM, and DMARC-related issues, even without a formal DMARC policy.
- Proactive DMARC Adoption is Key: While underlying checks occur, implementing a DMARC policy, even with a 'p=none', formalizes your authentication posture and provides explicit instructions for handling unauthenticated mail, improving sender reputation.
- Google's Rigorous Security Focus: Be aware that Google's systems are highly sensitive to authentication details and actively seek to flag any mail that does not meet its standards for trustworthiness.
Technical article
Documentation from support.google.com explains that as of February 2024, Google requires bulk senders to have a DMARC policy for their sending domain, even if it's set to 'p=none'. While this is a requirement for bulk senders, Google's systems inherently perform authentication checks (SPF and DKIM) for all incoming mail. If these fundamental checks fail, Google's interfaces will display messages or warnings indicating a lack of proper authentication, which is what DMARC aims to formalize and enforce.
13 Aug 2023 - support.google.com
Technical article
Documentation from DMARC.org explains that DMARC builds upon SPF and DKIM. Even if a domain doesn't explicitly publish a DMARC record, receiving mail servers, including Google's, will always perform SPF and DKIM authentication checks. If an email fails these underlying authentication mechanisms, the receiving server might internally flag it as unauthenticated or display warnings to the user, as these failures represent the exact issues DMARC is designed to detect and prevent through alignment.
3 Mar 2024 - DMARC.org
How does Google Workspace handle DMARC alignment for multiple domains?
How to debug DMARC authentication failure and alignment issues?
Why does Gmail show 'via' even when DMARC passes?
Why does Google Postmaster Tools show lower DMARC percentage despite SPF and DKIM alignment being 100%?
Why is Gmail showing a warning message despite passing DMARC?
Why is Google Postmaster Tools showing SPF misalignment despite passing DMARC for subdomain, and how to fix DMARC for root domain?
