Summary
When acquiring IP address blocks for email sending, it is crucial to understand the past reputation of these IPs and mitigate any existing issues. The duration for which an IP block should remain unused (or 'fallow') before deployment is a common question, and there's no single universal answer; it depends heavily on the block's history and the nature of any associated reputation problems. Beyond simply checking for blacklists, a thorough due diligence process is essential to ensure the IPs are clean and ready for warming up.
Key findings
- Fallow period variation: The ideal unused period for an IP block can range from a couple of weeks to six months, depending on its prior usage and reputation. Some suggest a minimum of two weeks to allow for initial reputation decay, while others recommend longer periods for extreme cases.
- Test sending is key: Regardless of the fallow period, conducting test sends to various mailbox providers is the most reliable way to assess an IP block's current reputation before full deployment. This helps identify any lingering issues.
- Blacklist checks are fundamental: Checking all IPs within the purchased block against major email blocklists and blacklists is a mandatory first step. Even if an IP has been unused, it might still carry historical listings.
- Reputation is dynamic: IP reputation is not static. Even unused IPs can retain some historical baggage. Consistent, low-volume test sending and careful monitoring are crucial for building a positive new reputation.
Key considerations
- Previous usage context: Understanding what the IP block was used for previously (e.g., legitimate marketing, spam, web hosting) can give insight into potential underlying reputation issues. This context is often hard to obtain but valuable.
- Thorough testing protocol: Implement a structured IP warming process with low sending volumes to gradually build trust. This includes sending to diverse recipients and monitoring engagement.
- ISP support: Ensure your Internet Service Provider (ISP) supports the specific type of IP block you're purchasing. Different types may have varying implications for email sending and infrastructure setup. More on this can be found in a guide to purchasing IPv4 blocks.
- Network setup time: Consider the time it takes your network engineering team to integrate and configure the new IP block. This period naturally contributes to the 'unused' time, allowing some reputation decay.
- Monitoring and remediation: Continuously monitor IP reputation and blacklist status. Be prepared to quickly request delisting if issues arise.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often approach newly acquired IP blocks with a mix of caution and pragmatism. While some advocate for a period of inactivity to let any negative reputation fade, many prioritize immediate, controlled testing. The general consensus leans towards proactive reputation building through meticulous warming processes rather than relying solely on dormancy. The challenge lies in balancing the desire for clean IPs with the urgency of getting them operational for sending campaigns.
Key opinions
- Test, don't just wait: Many marketers suggest starting with small, controlled test sends to assess IP reputation rather than leaving them fallow for an extended period. This provides real-time feedback.
- Two-week reset: A common recommendation for IPs with known issues is a two-week rest period, followed by a re-initiation of the warming process.
- Six-month caution: Some prefer a more conservative approach, suggesting up to six months of inactivity for maximum caution, especially if previous activity was suspicious.
- Operational delays: The time it takes for network engineers to set up new IPs often provides a natural 'idle' period before sending begins, which can be beneficial.
Key considerations
- Statistical significance: When testing new IPs, volumes must be low enough to prevent new problems but high enough to yield meaningful, statistically significant results on inbox placement.
- Warming strategy: A robust IP warming strategy is paramount. This involves gradually increasing sending volume while monitoring deliverability metrics, as detailed in guides like how long to warm up an IP.
- Previous history impact: The prior usage of the IP block heavily influences how much rest and warming it will need. A block used for spam will require more rehabilitation.
- Ongoing monitoring: Even after initial warming, continuous monitoring of deliverability is essential to catch any emerging issues. Tools like IPXO's marketplace for IPv4 addresses highlight the importance of verified resources.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks suggests test sending new IPs to warm them up effectively. They believe that performing some initial test sends, perhaps around 100 emails per mailbox provider daily for a few days, is a good starting point. This approach allows marketers to gauge the IP's current reputation directly rather than assuming it's clean after a period of dormancy.The previous usage of the IP block plays a significant role in determining whether a fallow period is even necessary. If the IPs were not heavily abused previously, they might not need to remain unused at all. The key is to be proactive and gather data through actual sending tests to inform further strategy.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks recommends a two-week rest period for IPs that have encountered warming issues or deliverability problems. This brief period of inactivity can help to clear recent negative signals before re-attempting the warming process. It acts as a soft reset, allowing the reputation to stabilize slightly.After this two-week rest, the marketer advises beginning the IP warming process again, but with heightened caution and closer monitoring. This iterative approach to reputation management is often necessary when dealing with challenging IP blocks that have accumulated some negative history.
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability and IP management stress the importance of understanding the full lifecycle and historical context of IP blocks. While a period of dormancy can be beneficial, it's not a magical cure-all for deeply entrenched reputation issues. The emphasis is typically on diligent pre-purchase checks, proactive testing, and consistent, compliant sending practices to build and maintain a strong sending reputation on any IP address, whether new or previously used. Experts also highlight the complexities of the IPv4 market.
Key opinions
- No fixed dormancy: There isn't a universally agreed-upon fixed period for leaving IPs unused; it largely depends on the specific history and previous use of the IP block.
- Due diligence is paramount: Beyond blacklists, thorough checks for prior spam activity, IP age, and the source of the IP block (e.g., from a reputable broker) are critical.
- Warming is non-negotiable: Even with a dormant period, a proper IP warming strategy remains essential to establish a new, positive sending reputation.
- Legal and RIR compliance: Ensure the transfer and use of IP blocks comply with regional internet registry (RIR) policies and legal requirements.
Key considerations
- Historical data analysis: Utilize available tools to analyze the historical reputation of the IP block, looking for patterns of abuse, prior blacklisting, or associations with known spam campaigns.
- Understanding listing types: Recognize that different types of blacklists have varying impacts and delisting procedures. Some are more persistent than others.
- Vendor reputation: When purchasing, work with reputable brokers or marketplaces that provide transparency regarding IP history and facilitate proper transfers, as detailed by IP Trading's blog on legal aspects.
- Ongoing deliverability audits: After deployment, regular deliverability audits and monitoring are crucial to detect any emerging issues related to the IP block's performance.
Expert view
Expert from Spamresource asserts that an IP's reputation is built over time and is directly tied to the sending behavior associated with it. Simply leaving an IP unused for a period may clear some transient blocklists, but it won't erase deeply ingrained negative history, especially if it was involved in severe abuse.The focus should always be on establishing legitimate sending practices from the outset. A clean historical slate is ideal, but for IPs with a checkered past, consistent positive sending is the only true way to rehabilitate their reputation, often requiring an extensive warming process.
Expert view
Expert from Wordtothewise advises that historical data on an IP's usage, if available, can be more informative than an arbitrary fallow period. They suggest looking for indicators such as previous RBL listings, spam trap hits, and sending volumes associated with the IP.Understanding the previous context helps determine the appropriate strategy, whether it's a longer dormancy, aggressive warming, or even avoiding the IP altogether if its history is too problematic. This deeper dive into history is often critical for long-term deliverability success.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and industry guides typically focus on the processes for IP transfer, allocation, and the technical requirements for maintaining a good sending reputation. While they don't often prescribe specific 'unused' periods, they highlight the importance of proper registration, validation, and adherence to sending best practices from the moment an IP becomes active. The emphasis is on building a clean reputation through legitimate usage and compliance with internet standards, rather than solely relying on inactivity.
Key findings
- Transfer and registration: Documentation outlines the formal processes for transferring IP address blocks between entities via Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) like ARIN, RIPE NCC, or APNIC. Proper registration is critical for legitimate usage.
- Validation and verification: Before an IP block can be used, both buyer and seller typically undergo a verification process by the RIR to ensure the legitimacy of the transaction and the parties involved.
- Technical configuration: Beyond acquisition, documentation emphasizes correct technical setup, including reverse DNS (rDNS) entries, SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records, which are fundamental for email deliverability.
- Policy adherence: Adherence to RIR policies and industry best practices for email sending is crucial. These policies aim to prevent abuse and maintain the health of the internet's addressing system.
Key considerations
- Anti-fraud measures: Marketplaces and registries implement anti-fraud measures during IP block transfers, which indirectly adds a layer of vetting to the IP's history, but does not guarantee reputation.
- IP monetization: The existence of IP leasing and selling markets means many IP blocks are acquired not from blacklisted sources, but from entities simply monetizing dormant or unused resources.
- Due diligence transparency: Some brokers may provide detailed blacklist reports or usage history as part of the purchase agreement, enabling buyers to conduct necessary due diligence.
- Ongoing obligations: Purchasing an IP block entails ongoing obligations to manage it responsibly, including promptly addressing any abuse reports or deliverability issues.
Technical article
Documentation from Interlir Networks Marketplace highlights the comprehensive guide needed to purchase IPv4 address space. It asserts that taking pragmatic measures is essential, including being prepared to sell or trade any unused IPv4 space you might acquire. This suggests a dynamic market where IP utilization is encouraged.The focus is on active management of IP resources, rather than prolonged dormancy. While not explicitly discouraging a fallow period, the emphasis on efficient transfer and potential re-monetization implies that IPs should be brought into use as quickly and responsibly as possible.
Technical article
Documentation from IPXO emphasizes that when selling IPv4 addresses, sellers might need to manage a dormant IP block, which incurs additional resource costs in terms of expertise, time, and money. This implies that while dormancy can occur, it's generally viewed as a cost rather than a strategic deliverability move by sellers.For buyers, this perspective suggests that IPs coming from a seller who has managed them as 'dormant' for a long time might indeed be cleaner due to that unintentional inactivity. However, the buyer still bears the responsibility for pre-use checks.
Related resources
14 resources
Related pages
What are the best practices for dedicated IP warm-up?
After what period of inactivity should an email sending domain be warmed up again?
Why do new IPs remain red in Microsoft SNDS during warming?
Why are my dedicated IPs blocked and how can I fix it?
Is a 30-day waiting period required when moving to a new IP range using BYOIP?
How long does it take to warm up an IP address for email marketing?
What to do about blocked bounces on first send with a new IP?
What are the considerations when purchasing a block of class C IP addresses for hosting mail servers?
An in-depth guide to email blocklists
What happens when your ip gets blocklisted?
