Summary
Sending emails to domains that no longer exist (NXDOMAINs) or to abandoned domains that have become spam traps can significantly impact your email deliverability. While an internet service provider (ISP) cannot directly observe your attempts to send to a non-existent domain, the underlying issues causing these attempts indicate poor list hygiene, which ISPs do monitor through various signals. Your email service provider (ESP) will certainly notice, as they handle the bounces before they even reach an ISP's systems. A high rate of hard bounces due to invalid or non-existent domains signals that your sending practices are questionable, potentially leading to a damaged sender reputation and reduced inbox placement.
Key findings
- NXDOMAIN impact: Sending to non-existent domains does not directly affect your reputation with an ISP because the email never reaches them. However, your own email service provider will log these as hard bounces.
- ESP monitoring: ESPs closely monitor the rate of hard bounces, including those from NXDOMAINs, as a high volume can indicate a sender with poor list quality or potentially spammy behavior.
- Dead domains and spam traps: Sending to 'dead' domains that once existed but are now abandoned is a serious risk. These often turn into spam traps, which are designed to catch senders with bad list hygiene and lead to blacklisting or blocklisting.
- Reputation damage: Consistently high bounce rates, especially hard bounces, signal to ISPs that your sending practices are problematic, negatively impacting your sender reputation and ultimately leading to more emails landing in the spam folder.
- Shared infrastructure risk: If you use a shared sending infrastructure, like a popular ESP, a high volume of NXDOMAIN bounces from your account can negatively affect the shared IP reputation, potentially leading to your ESP imposing restrictions on your sending.
Key considerations
- List hygiene: Implement robust list cleaning and validation processes to regularly remove invalid or non-existent email addresses. This is crucial for maintaining a healthy sender reputation.
- Bounce rate monitoring: Keep a close eye on your bounce rates, particularly hard bounces. A sudden spike can indicate issues with your list or collection methods.
- Permission-based lists: Only send to recipients who have explicitly opted in to receive your emails. This reduces the likelihood of collecting dead or invalid addresses, as well as minimizing spam complaints.
- Engagement monitoring: Focus on sending to engaged subscribers. Low engagement can also signal issues, and some ISPs will drop mail if they see a high proportion of unengaged recipients, even if the addresses are valid. This is often more impactful than just hitting dead domains.
- Address collection best practices: Review your email address collection methods to prevent invalid or expired addresses from entering your list. Using double opt-in is a highly recommended practice.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often express concern about the practical implications of sending to dead domains. While the direct impact on ISPs might seem abstract, the consensus is that it's a symptom of deeper problems with list management and acquisition. Marketers emphasize the importance of maintaining a clean and engaged list to avoid reputation issues that arise from consistently targeting invalid addresses. The focus shifts from the technical bounce itself to what that bounce rate signifies about the sender's practices and overall email program health.
Key opinions
- List hygiene priority: Many marketers prioritize rigorous list hygiene as the primary defense against deliverability issues caused by dead domains.
- ESP relationship: It's widely believed that an ESP will flag or penalize senders with high NXDOMAIN rates because it reflects poorly on the ESP's infrastructure and reputation.
- Engagement over reach: Marketers frequently prefer a smaller, highly engaged list over a large list filled with inactive or dead addresses, understanding that engagement is a key deliverability factor.
- Spam trap avoidance: The fear of hitting spam traps (which often arise from old, dead domains) is a significant driver for robust list cleaning practices.
- Data collection flaws: High bounce rates, including those to dead domains, are seen as an indicator that the initial email address collection process or ongoing data hygiene is fundamentally flawed.
Key considerations
- Regular validation: Periodically validate your email lists to identify and remove invalid or non-existent addresses before sending campaigns.
- Bounce handling: Ensure your ESP (or your internal system) correctly processes hard bounces and immediately removes those addresses from your active mailing lists.
- Segmentation: Segment your lists based on engagement. Sending to unengaged subscribers, even if their domains are active, can lead to deliverability issues.
- Signup process: Implement effective signup processes, such as reCAPTCHA and double opt-in, to minimize the collection of invalid or bot-generated addresses.
- Monitoring tools: Utilize analytics and deliverability tools to actively monitor your bounce rates and identify potential issues before they escalate.
Marketer view
A marketer from Email Geeks suggests that if an email domain does not exist in the DNS (NXDOMAIN), the only entity that might show concern is the email service provider (ESP) being used. This is because high volumes of NXDOMAINs can be indicative of a spammer, prompting the ESP to take action.
Marketer view
An email marketer from Customer.io indicates that a large number of bounces resulting from sending to non-existent or inactive email accounts can definitely reduce your sender reputation. This highlights the importance of keeping your email lists clean and up-to-date to ensure good deliverability.
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability consistently highlight that while the direct mechanics of an ISP knowing about an NXDOMAIN attempt might not be obvious, the indirect consequences are severe. They stress that sending to dead domains or non-existent addresses is a clear sign of poor list quality and improper sender behavior. The real concern isn't just the bounce, but what it reveals about the sender's data acquisition and maintenance, which can lead to broad reputation damage and increased scrutiny from mailbox providers.
Key opinions
- Root cause focus: Experts emphasize that high rates of bounces to non-existent domains point to fundamental issues in how email addresses are collected or managed.
- Indirect ISP awareness: While ISPs may not see the NXDOMAIN bounce directly, they observe the impact on sender reputation from ESPs that do log these bounces and from the overall quality of mail being sent.
- Sender responsibility: The responsibility for maintaining a clean list, free of dead domains and spam traps, lies squarely with the sender.
- Spamming indication: A high volume of bounces to non-existent or abandoned domains is a strong indicator of spamming behavior, leading to reduced trust from mailbox providers.
- Beyond NXDOMAIN: Experts stress that while NXDOMAINs are a concern, a greater worry is sending to valid addresses where recipients have not engaged, as this can still lead to emails going to spam.
Key considerations
- Proactive list validation: Implement continuous list validation and hygiene practices to prevent sending to invalid email addresses, including those with NXDOMAINs.
- Monitor bounce rates: Actively track hard bounces and remove non-existent addresses from your lists immediately.
- Sender reputation management: Understand that high bounce rates contribute to a negative sender reputation with ISPs and ESPs, impacting overall deliverability.
- Avoid purchased lists: Experts strongly advise against using purchased or unverified email lists, as they are often riddled with dead domains and spam traps.
- Review acquisition methods: Continuously assess and improve your email address acquisition methods to ensure you are collecting valid and engaged subscribers, as suggested by email deliverability experts.
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks states that ISPs will not know if your IP sent something to an NXDOMAIN because the email never reaches them. This clarifies the technical boundary of what an ISP can directly observe.
Expert view
An expert from SpamResource suggests that the challenge with 'dead' domains is often their transformation into spam traps. Senders who do not regularly clean their lists risk hitting these traps, which are designed to identify and penalize senders with poor list hygiene.
What the documentation says
Official documentation from email service providers and industry bodies consistently emphasizes the criticality of maintaining clean email lists to ensure good deliverability. They highlight that high bounce rates, especially hard bounces resulting from non-existent domains, are a strong indicator of poor list quality and can lead to significant reputation damage. Many services outline specific bounce thresholds beyond which they may take action, such as throttling sending or suspending accounts, to protect their shared infrastructure.
Key findings
- Hard bounce implications: Documentation defines hard bounces (including NXDOMAINs) as permanent delivery failures and states that these addresses should be immediately removed from mailing lists.
- Reputation correlation: There's a direct correlation between a sender's hard bounce rate and their domain/IP reputation, with higher bounce rates leading to lower trust from receiving servers.
- Spam trap risk: Documentation frequently warns about the danger of hitting spam traps, which are often created from old, unused, or invalid email addresses, resulting in immediate blacklisting (or blocklisting).
- List hygiene best practices: Providers recommend regular list cleaning, often suggesting automated bounce handling and suppression lists to prevent repeat sends to problematic addresses.
- Domain credibility: Documentation from platforms like Klaviyo underscores the importance of a sending domain's overall credibility and history, which is negatively impacted by sending to dead domains.
Key considerations
- Adhere to bounce thresholds: Monitor your bounce rate and ensure it stays below the acceptable thresholds set by major ISPs and your ESP to avoid penalties. Industry standards often suggest keeping hard bounce rates under 0.5%.
- Utilize bounce reporting: Leverage the bounce reports provided by your sending platform to identify and remove invalid addresses promptly. This is a crucial aspect of email deliverability testing.
- Implement opt-in processes: Documentation often recommends double opt-in to ensure subscribers are genuinely interested and provide valid email addresses, thereby reducing the likelihood of hitting dead domains.
- Regular list cleaning: Automate or schedule regular cleaning of your subscriber lists to remove unengaged subscribers and addresses that consistently hard bounce.
- Understand domain reputation: Be aware that maintaining a positive domain reputation is paramount, and sending to dead domains directly undermines this by signaling poor list quality.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailgun states that if too many messages begin landing in spam and harming your reputation, entire subdomains and IPs can be permanently tarnished. This emphasizes the widespread impact of poor sending practices, including hitting dead domains repeatedly.
Technical article
Documentation from Customer.io indicates that a large number of bounces caused by sending to non-existent or inactive email accounts can definitely reduce your sender reputation. This highlights the direct link between list quality and deliverability.
Related resources
14 resources
Related pages
How do email sending practices impact domain reputation and deliverability?
How do hard bounces impact email deliverability and sender reputation?
What are the different types of spam traps and how do they work?
Spam traps: what they are and how they work
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
How to Run an Email Deliverability Test: A Proven Checklist
Do abandoned email addresses quickly become spam traps and what is their impact on email deliverability?
Can negative email engagement on a subdomain affect the primary domain's reputation?
