Yes, Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) absolutely improves DMARC policy enforcement, specifically by addressing one of its most significant weaknesses: handling forwarded emails. While DMARC, along with SPF and DKIM, forms the bedrock of modern email authentication, its rigidity can cause legitimate emails to fail authentication checks when they pass through an intermediary, like a forwarding service or a mailing list.
ARC was developed to solve this exact problem. It creates a chain of custody for email authentication results, allowing a final receiving mail server to see that an email was authenticated correctly at a previous hop, even if the final checks fail. This prevents valid, forwarded emails from being incorrectly blocked or sent to spam due to a failed DMARC evaluation.
To understand why ARC is so important, we first need to look at why DMARC struggles with forwarded messages. DMARC relies on the results of two other protocols, SPF (Sender Policy Framework) and DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail), and requires at least one of them to pass and align with the domain in the 'From' header.
When an email is forwarded, the authentication chain often breaks:
When both of these checks fail, or fail to align, the forwarded email will fail the DMARC check. The receiving server then follows the sender's DMARC policy, which could be to quarantine or reject the message, even though it was originally legitimate.
ARC acts as a wrapper around the original authentication results, preserving them across multiple server hops. It doesn't replace DMARC, but rather extends it. As Sendmarc notes, ARC captures the original authentication results and adds special ARC headers to keep a record of these results as the email is forwarded.
Here’s how it works: an intermediary server (like a mail forwarder) that supports ARC will perform its own SPF, DKIM, and DMARC checks on an incoming email. It then records these results in a new set of headers (the ARC headers) and cryptographically signs them. This creates a trusted and verifiable 'seal'. When the final mail server receives the email, it will see that the direct DMARC check fails. However, it can then check for a valid ARC chain. If the chain is present and comes from a trusted intermediary, the server can look at the preserved authentication results. If the original result was a 'pass', the receiving server can choose to trust the ARC results and override the local DMARC failure, delivering the email correctly.
By providing this extra layer of information, ARC makes DMARC enforcement more intelligent. It gives receiving systems the context they need to differentiate between a maliciously spoofed email and a legitimate email that has simply been forwarded. This is crucial for reducing the number of false positives where valid mail is blocked.
According to the IETF, the standards body behind the protocol, ARC helps to close a critical gap in authentication. Major mailbox providers like Google and Microsoft have widely adopted ARC, as it allows them to trust forwarded mail from known, reputable sources. This ensures that their users still receive important forwarded communications without compromising security.
In summary, ARC doesn't change your DMARC policy, but it drastically improves how that policy is enforced by others. It adds the necessary nuance for handling complex but common email routing scenarios, ensuring that DMARC's powerful protection against spoofing doesn't inadvertently block legitimate mail. For any organization that relies on email, ARC is a critical component for ensuring reliable message delivery in a DMARC-enabled world.