Suped

Why are Bounceback Message, SMTP Reply Code, and SMTP Error Code fields blank in bounce reporting?

Michael Ko profile picture
Michael Ko
Co-founder & CEO, Suped
Published 28 Apr 2025
Updated 17 Aug 2025
7 min read
It can be perplexing when bounce reports show blank fields for bounceback messages, SMTP reply codes, and SMTP error codes. These blanks can obscure critical information needed to diagnose email delivery issues and maintain good sender reputation. Understanding why these fields might be empty is crucial for effective email management.
Blank bounce data often points to specific scenarios where standard SMTP error reporting mechanisms are bypassed or misinterpreted. This can stem from how the recipient server handles the email, the type of bounce that occurs, or how your sending platform processes bounce notifications. Delving into these possibilities helps shed light on the missing information.

Understanding bounce types

Email delivery failures typically fall into two categories: in-band and out-of-band bounces. In-band rejections occur during the initial SMTP transaction, meaning the receiving mail server immediately rejects the email and provides an SMTP reply code, such as a 4xx (temporary) or 5xx (permanent) code.
In these scenarios, the sending server receives an explicit bounce message directly from the recipient server, which typically contains the relevant error codes and a human-readable explanation. Your bounce reporting system should capture this information consistently. When an email bounces back with an error, it provides insights into why the email was not sent successfully, as detailed in various SMTP error messages.
The other type is out-of-band (OOB) bounces, where the receiving server initially accepts the message, but then determines later that it cannot be delivered. This failure happens after the SMTP transaction, and a separate bounce notification email is sent to the address specified in the Return-Path header. These are prime candidates for blank fields because the bounce handler on the sending platform may struggle to parse the varying formats of these asynchronous bounce emails. You can learn more about how these differ by looking at unformatted out-of-band bounces.
Additionally, some messages might be non-delivery reports (NDRs), which might have their own formatting challenges.

The role of your sending platform

The way your sending platform (Email Service Provider, or ESP) interprets and displays bounce information significantly impacts what you see in your reports. ESPs are responsible for parsing raw SMTP responses and bounce emails to populate their dashboards with human-readable data. If their parsing logic isn't robust, especially for less common or malformed bounce messages, you might see blank fields.

ESP bounce processing

  1. Interpretation issues: Your ESP may fail to extract information from non-standard bounce messages.
  2. Reporting limitations: Not all ESPs provide granular bounce data in their standard reports.
  3. Internal suppression: If the ESP prevents delivery due to internal rules, no SMTP error occurs.
It is possible that the email never reached the SMTP stage with the recipient server. Some bulk email sending systems implement internal rules, suppression lists, or pre-delivery checks. If an email is blocked by these internal mechanisms before attempting actual delivery, no SMTP rejection message is generated. In such cases, the ESP might record a bounce but without any associated SMTP code or message, as the communication never happened externally.
If you're facing persistent blank fields, consider reaching out to your ESP's support. They may be able to provide the raw bounce data or offer insights into their bounce processing logic. Understanding how ESPs classify and manage SMTP bounce codes is key to troubleshooting these issues.

Common causes for blank bounce fields

One common reason for blank bounce fields is the involvement of autoresponders. While some autoresponders provide standard SMTP replies or detailed messages, older or less sophisticated ones might simply accept the email and then send an automated reply that your ESP's bounce handler struggles to categorize as a formal bounce. This often happens if the autoresponder acts as an intermediary, effectively accepting the mail before generating a notice. Such cases might be mistaken for soft bounces, which typically have a 400 range SMTP code, but without a specific message.
Recipient server behavior also plays a significant role. Some mailbox providers or corporate mail servers might intentionally suppress detailed bounce messages for various reasons, such as preventing information leakage or reducing server load. For instance, if an email is rejected due to a policy violation or if the sending IP (internet protocol) is on an internal blacklist (or blocklist), the server might simply drop the connection or provide a generic response without a specific SMTP error code or message. This can lead to a general block or rejection without a clear reason.
In other instances, a full mailbox can also contribute to blank bounce fields. While a full mailbox usually triggers a standard hard bounce (permanent failure), some configurations might lead to a silent or poorly formatted bounce notice. Additionally, issues like an unreachable server, whether due to a crash, overload, or maintenance, can cause emails to bounce back with no clear error details, requiring you to wait before retrying.

Troubleshooting and prevention

When encountering blank bounce fields, your first step should be to assess the prevalence of the issue. A very low percentage of blank bounces, say 0.00001% of your total sends, might indicate rare edge cases or harmless autoresponders and might not warrant extensive investigation. However, if 1% or more of your bounces lack critical information, it's a strong indicator of a systemic issue that needs addressing to prevent deliverability problems.
Obtaining the raw bounce data from your ESP is often the most effective way to troubleshoot blank fields. This raw data contains the exact response from the recipient server, which may include details not parsed into your standard reports. Analyzing this raw data can reveal patterns, specific error messages, or non-standard bounce formats that your ESP is missing. This process is part of a broader strategy for troubleshooting bounce messages.

Best practices for bounce management

  1. Monitor bounce rates: Regularly check your bounce rate and the details of all bounces.
  2. Clean your lists: Immediately remove hard bounces and recipients generating autoresponders.
  3. Communicate with ESP: Ask for raw bounce data if reports are unclear.
  4. Review email content: Ensure your content isn't triggering spam filters or obscure rejections.
Beyond technical troubleshooting, maintaining a healthy email list is paramount. Regularly cleaning your list of invalid or inactive addresses reduces your overall bounce rate and improves your sender reputation. Pay particular attention to recipients that trigger autoresponders, especially those that forward to ticketing systems, as these can dilute your engagement metrics and lead to suboptimal campaign performance.

Views from the trenches

Best practices
Always monitor your bounce rates diligently, especially looking for patterns in blank entries.
Work closely with your ESP to understand how they process and report bounce data, requesting raw data when necessary.
Segment your audience and tailor content to minimize the chance of triggering autoresponders or silent rejections.
Common pitfalls
Ignoring blank bounce fields, assuming they are harmless or rare occurrences.
Failing to differentiate between in-band and out-of-band bounces in reporting analysis.
Not removing autoresponders from your mailing list, leading to continued low-quality engagements.
Expert tips
Implement a feedback loop mechanism to catch bounce types that might not appear in standard reports.
Consider using a dedicated bounce processing tool if your ESP's reporting is consistently insufficient.
Develop a clear protocol for handling different bounce types based on their impact on deliverability and sender reputation.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says that delivery failures can be in-band, occurring during the SMTP transaction, or out-of-band, where the server accepts the message but sends a notification later to the Return-Path address.
2024-06-13 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says that blank bounce fields likely occur because the sending platform isn't properly extracting information from the bounce email, even though the data should be present.
2024-06-13 - Email Geeks

Ensuring visibility in bounce reporting

Blank bounceback message, SMTP reply code, and SMTP error code fields in your bounce reporting can be frustrating, but they are often symptomatic of specific underlying issues. These include how your ESP processes bounce notifications, the occurrence of out-of-band bounces, or the behavior of recipient mail servers and autoresponders. In some cases, emails may not even reach the SMTP stage due to internal suppression by the sending platform.
By understanding these potential causes and actively troubleshooting, such as requesting raw bounce data from your ESP and maintaining a clean subscriber list, you can gain better visibility into your email deliverability. This proactive approach helps ensure your messages reach their intended recipients, improving overall email performance and protecting your sender reputation from blacklisting (or blocklisting) issues.

Frequently asked questions

DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard

What you'll get with Suped

Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing