The current state of IPv6 for email sending is one of growing adoption, but with significant challenges and best practices that must be considered. While IPv6 offers a vast address space and is technically viable, its adoption is still limited, with estimates placing IPv6 email traffic at approximately 5-10% of total email volume. Experts recommend a balanced approach, suggesting ESPs consider sending as much mail as possible via dedicated IPv6 with a fallback to a smaller pool of IPv4. A gradual transition is advised, starting with a small percentage of IPv6 traffic and closely monitoring deliverability. Technical documentation emphasizes the need for proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) for IPv6 senders. Good IP reputation remains crucial, and senders should monitor IPv6 sending reputation separately from IPv4, considering reputation on the /64 level. Challenges include inconsistent support among ISPs, legacy systems in smaller organizations that may not fully support IPv6, and some anti-spam systems not fully updated for IPv6 ranges. Other best practices include maintaining consistent reverse DNS records, avoiding blocklists, warming up IPv6 addresses like IPv4 addresses, and ensuring updated security appliances and intrusion detection systems.
9 marketer opinions
While IPv6 adoption in email is growing, it remains limited, accounting for a small percentage of total email traffic (around 5-10%). Challenges include inconsistent support among ISPs, the need to manage separate IPv4 and IPv6 reputations, and the fact that many anti-spam systems are not fully updated for IPv6. Best practices involve a gradual transition, starting with a small percentage of IPv6 traffic and closely monitoring deliverability. Maintaining both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses ensures maximum compatibility, and senders should warm up their IPv6 addresses like IPv4 addresses, beginning with low volumes and gradually increasing the sending rate. Ensuring proper authentication and monitoring reputation across broader network segments are also essential for maintaining deliverability.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Quora says that one of the biggest challenges is that some ISPs are slow to fully implement IPv6, and their filtering systems may not be fully optimized for IPv6 email, which can cause deliverability issues even for legitimate senders.
10 Nov 2023 - Quora
Marketer view
Email marketer from Reddit shares that while IPv6 is technically viable, the biggest hurdle is that not all receiving mail servers are equally equipped to handle it, leading to potential deliverability issues. They note that many smaller organizations still rely on legacy systems that may not fully support IPv6.
27 Sep 2024 - Reddit
9 expert opinions
Experts generally agree that while IPv6 functions well with many mailbox providers and offers a vast address space, it's not without its challenges. Proper authentication is crucial, and relying solely on IPv6 is discouraged. A balanced approach, leveraging IPv6 where possible with a fallback to IPv4, is advised. Obtaining your own IPv4 range is also a viable option. Managing reputation in IPv6 differs, with reputation often assessed at the /64 subnet level. IP reputation, in general, is becoming less significant, but correct reverse DNS is essential. Blocklisting and network neighborhoods can pose issues. Providers like OVH, with non-standard IPv6 allocations, can cause deliverability problems.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks, Steve Atkins (WttW), mentions how it’s much cheaper, easier, and quicker to get a /64 IPv6 burner address than a single IPv4 address. Then Laura Atkins (she/her) added, there are more IPs in a /64 (the smallest allocated amount) than in all of IPv4. You could basically send one message per IP and never run out of IPs. Steve also noted that filtering or tracking reputation wouldn't be based on single IPs.
23 May 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that IPv6 works fine at many mailbox providers, with caveats about requiring modern authentication, but not all, advising caution about being IPv6-only.
9 May 2025 - Email Geeks
4 technical articles
Technical documentation suggests that while IPv6 is the recommended direction for internet mail transmission, IPv4 remains critical for interoperability, particularly during the transition. Proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is essential for IPv6 senders, and good IP reputation remains crucial, subject to similar spam filtering rules as IPv4. Maintaining consistent reverse DNS records and avoiding blocklists are important, along with monitoring IPv6 sending reputation separately. Securing IPv6 email traffic necessitates updated security appliances and intrusion detection systems.
Technical article
Documentation from Cisco Security Team specifies that securing IPv6 email traffic requires updated security appliances and software to handle IPv6 addresses and protocols. They also recommend implementing intrusion detection and prevention systems capable of analyzing IPv6 traffic.
13 Apr 2022 - Cisco
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft Exchange Team outlines that IPv6 senders should maintain consistent reverse DNS records and ensure their IPs are not listed on blocklists. The documentation also stresses the importance of monitoring IPv6 sending reputation separately from IPv4, as different metrics may apply.
31 Jan 2024 - Microsoft
Can sending email from IPv4 cause delivery issues to IPv6 recipients, and how can I ensure compatibility?
Do I need DMARC for transactional emails from a small website, and what are the best low-cost alternatives for sending emails if my IP is blocked?
How do SPF, DKIM, and DMARC affect email deliverability with Cvent?
How do SPF, DKIM, and DMARC email authentication standards work?
What are SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, and when are they needed?
What are the challenges and benefits of using IPv6 for email deliverability?