Summary
Experts, marketers, and documentation alike agree: an email marketing conference struggling with its own email deliverability raises significant concerns about its credibility and the value of its teachings. Landing in spam indicates a lack of competence, poor sender reputation, failure to adhere to best practices, and potential use of questionable marketing tactics like purchased lists. This undermines trust in the conference's ability to provide relevant and effective advice.
Key findings
- Credibility Crisis: Spam placement directly damages a conference's credibility as email marketing experts.
- Practical Incompetence: Failure to deliver emails suggests a lack of practical application and effective strategies.
- Questionable Practices: Use of unsolicited emails (possible purchased lists) raises ethical and strategic flags.
- Reputation Risk: Poor sender reputation severely impacts inbox placement and trust.
- Authentication & Compliance: Failure to properly authenticate emails or maintain a clean list points to fundamental issues.
Key considerations
- Evaluate Expertise: Thoroughly assess the conference organizers' proven track record and demonstrated expertise in deliverability.
- Ethical Standards: Consider the conference's ethical marketing practices and their impact on reputation.
- Current Best Practices: Ensure the conference's teachings align with current industry standards and regulations.
- Monitor Reputation: Verify the conference actively monitors its sender reputation and addresses deliverability issues.
- Real World Results: Look for verifiable evidence of the conference's success in achieving high inbox placement for themselves and their clients.
What email marketers say
10 marketer opinions
The consensus among email marketers is that an email marketing conference's inability to keep its own invitations out of spam folders is a significant red flag. This failure suggests a lack of practical expertise, outdated knowledge, and questionable adherence to best practices, undermining the conference's credibility and the value of its teachings.
Key opinions
- Red Flag: Invitations landing in spam suggest the conference may not practice what they preach.
- Credibility Issues: Poor deliverability reflects badly on expertise and sender reputation.
- Practical Application: Theoretical knowledge is insufficient if organizers can't deliver their own emails.
- Direct Reflection: Conference's deliverability is a direct reflection of the organizer's knowledge and practices.
- Undermined Credibility: Conference invitation landing in spam undermines credibility in email marketing.
Key considerations
- Expertise Validation: Evaluate if the conference organizers demonstrate basic email marketing competencies.
- Relevance & Practices: Consider if the conference's teachings align with current deliverability best practices.
- Practical Skills: Ensure the speakers have practical experience in getting emails delivered.
- In-Inbox Experience: Consider that If the emails land in the inbox it might be worth trusting the conference to teach you to do the same.
Marketer view
Email marketer from LinkedIn argues that practical application is crucial. If the conference organizers can't even deliver their own emails, their theoretical knowledge might not be effective.
6 Apr 2023 - LinkedIn
Marketer view
Email marketer from Neil Patel's Blog stresses basic email deliverability practices are essential. If an email marketing conference invitation lands in spam, it undermines their credibility.
21 May 2023 - Neil Patel
What the experts say
3 expert opinions
Experts suggest that an email marketing conference sending unsolicited emails (potentially using purchased lists) and failing to avoid spam filters raises serious concerns about their competence, adherence to best practices, and sender reputation. This undermines the trustworthiness of their advice, as good sender reputation and permission-based marketing are fundamental to successful email deliverability.
Key opinions
- Unsolicited Emails: Use of potentially purchased lists is a negative signal.
- Competence Concerns: Landing in spam raises concerns about competence and best practices.
- Reputation Matters: Poor sender reputation casts doubt on trustworthiness.
- Good Housekeeping: Inconsistent with the advice a good conference would provide.
Key considerations
- Ethical Practices: Consider the ethical implications of the conference's marketing practices.
- Reputation Assessment: Assess the conference's sender reputation and email deliverability.
- Expertise Evaluation: Evaluate whether the conference organizers demonstrate email marketing expertise and best practices.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks shares that some people are getting mail advertising the Guru conference who had never opted in, classifying this as potentially using “purchased” lists.
17 May 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource.com explains that landing in the spam folder raises significant concerns about an email sender's competence and adherence to best practices, thus impacting credibility.
7 Apr 2025 - SpamResource.com
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
Email deliverability documentation emphasizes the critical importance of email authentication, clean email lists, strong sender reputation, and adherence to best practices for avoiding spam filters. The inability of an email marketing conference to consistently reach the inbox undermines its credibility, suggesting a failure to implement these fundamental principles and raising concerns about the trustworthiness of their advice.
Key findings
- Authentication Failure: Conference's spam placement suggests a failure to adhere to email authentication protocols.
- Reputation Damage: Poor email practices likely indicate a damaged sender reputation.
- Implementation Issues: Conference's deliverability problem indicates a failure to address known spam triggers.
- Tool Ignorance: Failure to utilize reputation monitoring tools raises questions about competence.
Key considerations
- Authentication Checks: Verify if the conference uses proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC).
- Reputation Monitoring: Consider whether the conference actively monitors and manages its sender reputation.
- Deliverability Expertise: Evaluate if the conference demonstrates expertise in avoiding spam filters.
- Email list health: Confirm they are managing a clean email list with active users.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailchimp emphasizes the importance of adhering to email authentication protocols and maintaining a clean email list to avoid spam filters, practices that any reputable email marketing conference should demonstrate.
20 Apr 2022 - Mailchimp
Technical article
Documentation from Google highlights tools available to monitor sender reputation and identify deliverability issues. A conference failing to use these tools and landing in spam raises questions.
8 Sep 2021 - Google
Are auto warming/deliverability improvement services for email marketing sketchy?
How can I effectively avoid spam filters when sending emails?
How can I fix my emails landing in Gmail spam folder?
How can I intentionally deliver emails to the spam folder?
What are spam trigger words and how do they impact email deliverability?
What to do if your IP is blacklisted on SORBS?
