Suped

VerifyDMARC vs Fraudmarc Community Edition

Choose VerifyDMARC for a guided experience, choose Fraudmarc Community Edition for self-managed control.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
VerifyDMARC offers a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting features designed for ease of use. It focuses on providing clear visualisations of DMARC data, allowing users to quickly identify email authentication issues and track their DMARC compliance over time.
Their platform provides aggregated reports, detailed forensic reports (where available), and tools to help understand sender sources, DMARC policy enforcement, and potential spoofing attempts. We found its reporting interface quite intuitive, streamlining the path from raw data to actionable insights.
Fraudmarc Community Edition (CE) provides the raw, open-source framework for DMARC reporting. Its feature set is fundamentally different as it's a self-hosted solution, meaning the user is responsible for setup, maintenance, and the development of their own reporting dashboards.
While Fraudmarc CE can process DMARC aggregate reports, it requires technical expertise to deploy, configure, and extract meaningful insights. The power lies in its flexibility and control, allowing advanced users to tailor the reporting to their exact needs, but this comes with significant overhead.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
VerifyDMARC shines in its user experience for those who prefer a managed service. The dashboard is clean, well-organised, and guides users through the DMARC implementation and monitoring process. Data is presented with helpful graphs and summaries, making it easy to digest complex information without needing deep DMARC knowledge.
Setting up domains and monitoring reports is straightforward, and the platform aims to reduce the learning curve. We found the navigation logical, allowing quick access to key performance indicators and specific report details. It's a user-friendly approach that prioritises accessibility.
Fraudmarc Community Edition, being an open-source, self-hosted solution, offers a starkly different user experience. It's not a ready-to-use application with a polished UI. Instead, users are responsible for deploying the software, configuring databases, and potentially building their own front-end for data visualisation.
This means the 'user experience' is entirely in the hands of the implementer. While this offers ultimate customisation, it demands a high level of technical proficiency in server management, database administration, and potentially web development. It's an experience for the DIY enthusiast, not for casual users.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
VerifyDMARC provides direct support channels typical of a SaaS product. Users can expect assistance through email, and potentially chat or phone, especially for paid plans. Their support team helps with onboarding, technical issues, and understanding DMARC reports and policy adjustments.
We found the responsiveness to be satisfactory, with clear guidance provided for common DMARC challenges. This direct line of communication is a significant advantage for those who prefer guided assistance over self-service troubleshooting.
Fraudmarc Community Edition, as its name implies, relies on community-driven support. Assistance is primarily available through their community forum, where users can ask questions, share solutions, and report bugs. This model means support quality and response times can vary greatly.
For complex issues or unique configurations, users must depend on the collective knowledge of the community. While a dedicated forum fosters collaboration, it's not a substitute for direct vendor support, which can be a hurdle for those less accustomed to open-source environments.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
VerifyDMARC is highly suitable for SMBs and enterprises that need a plug-and-play DMARC reporting solution without heavy internal technical overhead. It's also a good fit for MSPs looking to manage DMARC for multiple clients efficiently, thanks to its user-friendly interface and comprehensive reporting.
Its guided approach and clear dashboards make it ideal for organisations that want to quickly gain control over their email authentication posture and achieve DMARC compliance with minimal fuss. While enterprise-ready, it scales well for smaller businesses too, offering a good balance of features and usability.
Fraudmarc Community Edition is best suited for highly technical users, developers, or organisations with specific, custom requirements who prefer complete control over their infrastructure. This includes some MSPs who have the in-house expertise to manage and customise open-source solutions for their clients.
It's generally not suitable for typical SMBs or enterprises lacking dedicated IT or DevOps teams. For these, the time and resources required for setup, maintenance, and custom development would likely outweigh the benefits of a free, open-source tool. It's a powerful tool for those who know how to wield it.

How does VerifyDMARC compare with Fraudmarc Community Edition?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

The primary drawback of VerifyDMARC is that while it offers robust DMARC reporting, it might not provide the deep customisation options some advanced users or large enterprises with specific data integration needs require. Its guided nature, a strength for many, can feel restrictive for those who want granular control over raw data. For Fraudmarc Community Edition, the significant drawback is the sheer technical barrier to entry and ongoing maintenance. While free, it demands considerable time, expertise, and resources to set up, secure, and manage effectively, lacking the polish and direct support of a commercial product.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

VerifyDMARC offers tiered pricing starting at an accessible point, while Fraudmarc Community Edition is entirely free, requiring self-management and custom development.
Logo
Logo
Small
Starts at $1/month (Personal plan), 2 months free if yearly.
Free (self-managed).
Medium
Starter and Medium plans available, contact for specifics.
Free (self-managed).
Large
Large plans available, contact for specifics.
Free (self-managed).
Enterprise
Contact sales@verifydmarc.com for larger plans.
Free (self-managed) or contact Fraudmarc for commercial plans.

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with VerifyDMARC or Fraudmarc Community Edition?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions