Suped

URIports vs Parseddmarc

Choose URIports for a managed service, Parseddmarc for a self-hosted open-source solution.
Parseddmarc
Compare to Suped
Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports provides a comprehensive DMARC reporting and monitoring platform. We found its dashboard to be quite intuitive, presenting aggregate and forensic reports in an easily digestible format. It goes beyond basic DMARC, offering additional security features and insights into various web and email security policies.
Its analytical capabilities are strong, allowing for deep dives into email authentication issues. We particularly appreciate its automated source detection, which helps identify legitimate and illegitimate sending sources efficiently, reducing the noise so we can focus on what matters most.
Parseddmarc is an open-source Python package designed for parsing DMARC reports. It is not a full-fledged hosted platform, but rather a utility that gives you raw data. We used it to process DMARC reports received via various input sources like IMAP, Microsoft Graph, and the Gmail API.
The output is flexible, providing JSON and CSV formats. For advanced visualization, it integrates well with tools like Elasticsearch or Splunk, which we set up ourselves to gain dashboard functionality. This requires more technical setup and maintenance on our end to truly get actionable insights.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
The URIports interface is clean and modern, making it quite user-friendly. Navigating through reports, setting up domains, and configuring alerts felt straightforward. We didn't encounter any major hurdles during our usage, making the initial setup and ongoing monitoring a relatively smooth process.
Its predefined views and custom filtering options significantly reduce the time needed to analyze DMARC data. The visual representation of data helps in quickly identifying trends and potential issues, which is crucial for staying on top of our email deliverability.
As a command-line interface (CLI) utility, Parseddmarc's "user experience" is inherently different. There's no graphical interface out of the box, which means we interacted with it through code and scripts. This requires a comfortable understanding of Python, shell scripting, and system administration.
Setting up the parsing, configuring output, and integrating with other tools like Elasticsearch demanded a hands-on approach. While powerful and customizable, it certainly requires a more technical user to get started and maintain, as it's less about clicking and more about coding.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers basic product support across all tiers, with "In-Depth Premium Support" available in their highest "Himalaya" tier. We found their basic support to be responsive enough for general queries and troubleshooting common issues, which is exactly what we needed to keep things running smoothly.
The documentation is quite extensive, which often allowed us to find answers without needing direct support. For critical issues, having the option for premium support is a clear advantage for larger organizations that require dedicated and immediate assistance.
Being an open-source project, Parseddmarc's support largely relies on the community and its GitHub repository. We found that most of our "support" came from reviewing the project's issues, documentation, and sometimes, the source code itself, which means we often had to be our own detectives.
There's no commercial support team, which means we were responsible for debugging and resolving any issues we encountered. This model works well if you have in-house expertise and enjoy delving into the code, but it can be challenging if you prefer a managed service with dedicated assistance.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is well-suited for a broad range of users, from small businesses (SMBs) to larger enterprises looking for a managed DMARC reporting service. Its ease of use and comprehensive features make it an attractive option for those who want a ready-to-use solution without significant internal resource allocation. It's especially good for organizations that value a hands-off approach to DMARC monitoring.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), URIports offers team access and multi-tenancy features, allowing them to manage multiple client domains from a single dashboard effectively. It simplifies DMARC compliance for their diverse client base, providing a consistent and scalable solution across all managed properties.
Parseddmarc is ideal for organizations with strong technical capabilities, specifically those who prefer self-hosting and have the resources to manage their own infrastructure. It's a cost-effective choice for developers and system administrators who want granular control over their DMARC data processing. SMBs without significant IT resources might find it overwhelming.
MSPs might find it suitable if they specialize in custom deployments and have the expertise to build and maintain the entire DMARC reporting stack for their clients. For enterprise, it might be a component of a larger, custom-built security system, offering flexibility for integration but requiring substantial in-house development and support.

How does URIports compare with Parseddmarc?

Logo
Parseddmarc
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

URIports offers a robust managed service, but its higher-tier pricing can become substantial for very large organizations, and the 30-day data retention on lower plans might be restrictive for some looking for longer historical data. Parseddmarc, while free and open-source, demands significant technical expertise and infrastructure investment for setup and ongoing maintenance, lacking a user-friendly interface or dedicated commercial support.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Parseddmarc

Pricing

URIports operates on a tiered subscription model with a free trial, whereas Parseddmarc is an open-source, self-hosted solution with no direct software cost.
Logo
Parseddmarc
Small
Sand: $1/month (10k reports, 3 domains)
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Pebble: $6/month (100k reports, 5 domains)
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Stone: $28/month (500k reports, 25 domains)
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Himalaya: $440/month (10M reports, 400 domains)
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or Parseddmarc?
Logo
Parseddmarc
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    URIports vs Parseddmarc DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped