Suped

URIports vs MyDMARC

Choose URIports for comprehensive security reporting, MyDMARC for straightforward DMARC monitoring.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports extends beyond mere DMARC reporting, offering a robust suite for monitoring Content Security Policy (CSP), Network Error Logging (NEL), and MTA-STS, among others. Their platform provides extensive data enrichment, allowing us to delve deeply into reports with information like geocoding, hostname lookups, and Whois data.
We found URIports' custom views and filtering capabilities exceptionally powerful, enabling granular segmentation of complex data. It's a comprehensive tool designed for those who need a wide security lens over their domains, not just email authentication.
MyDMARC's primary focus is DMARC reporting, delivering a clear and concise overview of email authentication. While it expertly handles the essentials like SPF and DKIM, its core strength lies in streamlining DMARC enforcement and offering straightforward actionable insights.
We observed MyDMARC's emphasis on continuous, near real-time report parsing in its higher tiers, which is a critical advantage for immediate threat detection and response. It's built for users who prioritize efficient DMARC management without needing to navigate a broader security ecosystem.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports boasts a slick and feature-rich interface that puts a wealth of information at your fingertips. While undeniably powerful, the sheer volume of data and myriad configuration options can initially feel somewhat overwhelming, particularly for newcomers to advanced email security.
However, once we surmounted the initial learning curve, we genuinely appreciated the depth and flexibility URIports offers. It's a platform that rewards investment in understanding its capabilities, providing detailed insights once you've mastered its navigation.
We found MyDMARC to be remarkably user-friendly and highly intuitive. Its dashboard is exceptionally clean, and the DMARC reports are presented in an easy-to-digest format that quickly conveys essential information without unnecessary clutter.
MyDMARC clearly prioritizes clarity, making it straightforward to understand authentication results and take decisive action. This simplicity is a significant advantage for users who want to quickly grasp their DMARC posture without getting bogged down in intricate details.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports provides basic product support across all its tiers, with more 'In-Depth Premium Support' reserved exclusively for the top-tier 'Himalaya' plan. Our experience with their basic support was generally positive, finding responses to be timely and helpful for standard queries.
The tiered support model, however, means that users on lower plans might need to rely more on self-help resources or consider upgrading for assistance with more complex or critical issues. It's a functional, but segmented, support structure.
MyDMARC offers priority email support specifically for its 'Pro' plan subscribers, with other tiers receiving standard support. We found their priority support to be quite efficient, providing clear and actionable guidance when we engaged with them.
The distinction in support levels is transparent, which helps to set appropriate expectations for users across different plans. While standard support is adequate, the priority option adds significant value for those requiring faster or more dedicated assistance.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is exceptionally well-suited for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) due to its comprehensive reporting capabilities across various security policies and its 'Team Access' feature from the Stone tier, making it ideal for managing multiple clients. For enterprise organizations, its extensive feature set, including OpenID Connect and Certificate Monitor, positions it as a strong contender for complex, multi-faceted security needs.
Conversely, for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) primarily seeking basic DMARC monitoring without the broader security context, URIports might present an initial learning curve due to its extensive features. While the 'Sand' tier exists, larger SMBs needing more than just DMARC will find higher tiers more appropriate.
MyDMARC is particularly suitable for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) looking for a straightforward, effective DMARC solution without the added complexity of broader security reporting. Its clear interface and tiered pricing make it highly accessible for teams focused solely on email authentication. For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), it offers clear DMARC monitoring, but may lack some advanced multi-tenancy features or client-specific dashboards beyond simply adding more domains.
For enterprise organizations with advanced, multi-faceted email security or compliance needs beyond core DMARC, MyDMARC's more focused feature set might not provide the comprehensive oversight required. Its strength lies in DMARC essentials, which is excellent for its target audience, but can be a limitation for larger, more complex environments.

How does URIports compare with MyDMARC?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

URIports, while powerful, can be quite complex due to its extensive feature set, potentially overwhelming users who are primarily interested in DMARC alone. We also noted that advanced features and in-depth support are strictly paywalled behind higher tiers. MyDMARC, on the other hand, offers a more limited feature set, focusing predominantly on DMARC. This might not suffice for organizations needing broader email security or compliance monitoring. Furthermore, the absence of explicit multi-tenancy or a robust API can be a drawback for larger users or MSPs (managed service providers).
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

URIports offers a granular, volume-based tiered structure, while MyDMARC provides simpler tiers focused on domains and data retention.
Logo
Logo
Small
Sand: 10k reports, 3 domains, $1/month
Free: 1 domain, $0/month
Medium
Pebble: 100k reports, 5 domains, $6/month
Basic: 5 domains, $19/month
Large
Stone: 500k reports, 25 domains, $28/month
Pro: 20 domains, $49/month
Enterprise
Mountain: 2.5M reports, 100 domains, $110/month
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or MyDMARC?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    URIports vs MyDMARC DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped