Suped

URIports vs Everest

Choose URIports for robust DMARC insights, choose Everest for a broader deliverability suite.
LogoCompare to Suped
LogoCompare to Suped
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports focuses intensely on security reporting, offering a comprehensive suite for DMARC, CSP, NEL, SMTP TLS-RPT, Permissions Policy, COOP, and COEP. Their DMARC analysis is granular, providing deep insights into authentication failures and potential spoofing attempts. We appreciate its ability to filter out noise and prioritize actionable data, making it easier to pinpoint issues.
Beyond DMARC, URIports includes tools for SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MTA-STS validation and optimization. It provides detailed data enrichment with geocoding, hostname lookup, and Whois information, which is invaluable for identifying the true sources of problematic emails. The platform's automatic subdomain detection is a nice touch, ensuring no corner of your domain's email ecosystem goes unwatched.
Everest, on the other hand, presents itself as a more holistic email success platform, extending far beyond DMARC reporting. While it includes robust DMARC insights, its core strength lies in combining deliverability monitoring, inbox placement testing, email validation, and design tests. We found its reputation monitoring features, covering IPs and domains, to be quite thorough, providing a broader view of email health.
The platform integrates various data sources like Microsoft SNDS and Google Postmaster Tools into a single dashboard, which is convenient for a bird's-eye view. Everest's focus is on optimizing overall email program performance, not just DMARC compliance. It aims to help users ensure their emails not only get delivered but also land in the inbox and engage recipients effectively.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports boasts a slick and easy-to-use interface, which we generally found to be true. The dashboards are clean and present information logically, allowing for quick comprehension of DMARC and other security reports. The search and filter capabilities are strong, enabling users to deep dive into specific data points without much hassle. Setting up custom views also helps streamline daily monitoring.
However, for users less familiar with the intricacies of DMARC and email security policies, the sheer depth of technical information might initially feel a bit overwhelming. While the advanced DMARC explanation tool is helpful, a more guided onboarding experience for new users focusing on immediate actionable steps could further improve accessibility.
Everest's user experience has seen significant evolution, particularly after its integration with Return Path and 250ok. The platform aims for an intuitive and customizable dashboard experience, allowing users to tailor their view to their most critical metrics. We found the ability to create dashboards and share them across an organization to be a strong point, fostering collaboration.
That said, some users report a learning curve, especially given the breadth of features Everest offers. Navigational aids, while present, could be more robust, as finding specific tools or reports might require some clicking around. For those accustomed to the previous platforms, the transition could also present some initial challenges, as noted in a few reviews.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers basic product support across all tiers, with "In-Depth Premium Support" becoming available at their highest tier, Himalaya. From our experience, the basic support is responsive for general queries and platform usage. The documentation is comprehensive, which often allows users to self-solve common issues without needing to contact support.
For highly technical DMARC or email security policy questions, the in-depth support is certainly beneficial. However, for smaller teams or those on lower tiers, the reliance on self-help resources and basic support means that complex issues might require more independent research. They don't typically offer dedicated account managers for most plans.
Everest's support structure often includes access to Customer Success Managers, particularly for Professional and Enterprise tiers, which is a significant advantage. Many users praise the responsiveness and helpfulness of their account managers, especially during onboarding and for strategic advice. This personalized support can be crucial for complex deliverability issues or platform integrations.
However, some reviews indicate that while account managers are good, technical support might take longer for clarification. There are also mentions of historical issues with customer support after acquisitions, though it seems to have picked up again. For smaller plans, support might be less personalized, relying more on general channels and self-service resources.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is an excellent fit for organizations that prioritize deep email security and DMARC compliance. Small and medium businesses (SMBs) can benefit from its clear interface and actionable DMARC insights, especially with its accessible entry-level pricing. Enterprise organizations with complex domain portfolios will appreciate the granular control and detailed reporting across various security policies.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), URIports offers multi-domain management capabilities and detailed reporting that can be easily configured for various clients. Its focus on detailed, enriched data about email sources and authentication makes it ideal for security-conscious teams and those needing to enforce strict DMARC policies across multiple domains.
Everest is geared towards email marketers and deliverability professionals who need a comprehensive view of their entire email program. SMBs with growing email volumes will find value in its inbox placement and reputation monitoring, though the pricing might be a steeper barrier to entry. Enterprise teams with extensive email campaigns will leverage its broad feature set, including list validation and engagement analytics.
While MSPs can certainly use Everest for their clients' deliverability, its pricing structure and feature set are often more aligned with larger organizations managing significant email sending volumes. It's best for those who require an all-in-one platform to optimize inbox placement, monitor reputation, and analyze engagement, rather than solely focusing on DMARC enforcement.

How does URIports compare with Everest?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

URIports, while feature-rich for email security, can be overwhelming for beginners with its technical depth and lacks dedicated account management on lower tiers. Everest, despite its comprehensive suite, has been cited for challenging setup processes, potentially buggy list validation, and a less intuitive UI in some areas, alongside concerns about customer service consistency after acquisitions.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Shady sales practice shoot down ok software - don't use these guys
What do you like best about Everest? The software is decent and the validation program works for Microsoft (Hotmail etc) based email, but not for Gmail What do you dislike about Everest? Terrible sales practice. Call you within 45 days of renewal, when you ask to change you are told you can't as there is a hidden lock-in in the T+Cs, you need to give 60 days' notice. Legal but shady, we renewed and then immediately gave notice for next year. They used to be good not so now. Recommendations to others considering Everest: Find another supplier, these guys are sharks What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you? Helped delivery to MS-based email
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Good for Beginners in Deliverability...Could be Better for Pros
What do you like best about Everest? Setting up Dashboards to monitor all deliverability metrics What do you dislike about Everest? Support is okay, but it could be lot better Navigational aids are not comparable to other industry-rated tools. Recommendations to others considering Everest: New to the deliverability landscape, this tool is perfect for you, but if you are an industry pro and understand the ins and outs of deliverability I would look elsewhere. What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you? Improving inbox placement Lowering spam complaints
Bryan P.
Email, SMS Marketing Director Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Review after using more than 2 months
What do you like best about Everest? Able to help in domain and IP blacklisted daily checking. Quick display the domain reputation status. After using Inbox placement service and domains/IP pools, feel their interface is nice and clear. What do you dislike about Everest? Does not provide the IP or domain score with ISP like Hotmail and Yahoo. Inbox percentage in accurate due to need send to all seed's ISP just able to get the score. Inbox percentage for Hotmail does not accurate. Does not provide whitelisting service for IPs. It is just a simple domain blacklisting status system. What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you? None of the problem have been solving through this Everest. It just a inbox placement display system only. Easily noticed on domain blacklisted only. Other than this are nothing.
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
It's been really difficult to switch over to Everest from Return Path due to seedlist testing issues
What do you like best about Everest? I like the accessibility to create dashboards and share across the org. What do you dislike about Everest? The only downside was that it was extremely difficult to switch over to everest from return path due to seedlisting issues mainly from our ESP, Braze What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you? Mainly using everest for deliverability measurement. havent had the chance to use it for more since we've been spending a lot of time switching platforms.
Verified User in Food & Beverages
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
So far not so good
What do you like best about Everest? We've been working on setting up since mid-August, but due to issues on the platform side, have been unable to fully set up. That said, our account manager has been responsive and diligently working on getting the issues resolved, so I would say that the user support is the best part. What do you dislike about Everest? We're on our third month trying to get set up due to platform issues, which I think is not great considering the price. Return Path set up went much smoother, and we were able to get started right away without a hitch. Recommendations to others considering Everest: Prepare for a longer-than-estimated setup process. What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you? Monitoring email deliverability is of utmost importance to our business. Being able to see when things take a turn for the worse and being able to react quickly helps us keep our email reputation positive and keeps our emails in user's inboxes!
Verified User in Health, Wellness and Fitness
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Pricing

URIports offers more granular, volume-based pricing with a very affordable entry-point, while Everest starts higher and scales significantly.
Logo
Logo
Small
Sand: $1/month (10k reports)
Elements: $40/month (5k-10k emails)
Medium
Pebble: $6/month (100k reports)
Elements Plus: $900/month (60k-100k emails)
Large
Stone: $28/month (500k reports)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Mountain/Himalaya: $110-$440/month
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or Everest?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions