Suped

URIports vs DMARCEye

Choose URIports for comprehensive security reporting, choose DMARCEye for AI-powered DMARC insights.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers a broad suite of monitoring capabilities extending beyond just DMARC. We've found its strength lies in its ability to consolidate various security reports, including Content Security Policy (CSP), Network Error Logging (NEL), and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT, alongside DMARC. This makes it a robust platform for overall domain security posture, rather than solely email authentication.
The platform provides detailed data enrichment, offering insights like geocoding, hostname lookup, and Whois data, which we find invaluable for deep-diving into suspicious activities. Its tools for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation are comprehensive, helping us understand and troubleshoot potential issues quickly.
DMARCEye distinguishes itself with a strong focus on DMARC reporting and leveraging AI for analysis. We've experienced its AI-powered monitoring firsthand, which provides an extra layer of intelligence to DMARC reports, often simplifying complex data into actionable insights. This can be particularly beneficial for users who prefer a more guided approach to DMARC implementation and monitoring.
While its reporting might be more narrowly focused on DMARC compared to URIports, it excels in making DMARC data understandable. The platform prioritizes ease of use and clarity in presenting DMARC authentication results, helping us quickly identify legitimate senders and potential spoofing attempts.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports presents a slick and functional interface. Navigating through the various report types and drilling down into specific data points is straightforward. The custom views feature is a significant plus, allowing us to tailor our dashboard to the metrics that matter most to our operations. It feels like a tool built for security professionals who appreciate granular control and a wealth of data.
However, with great power comes a certain level of complexity. For those new to the nuances of email security and the various reporting standards, the sheer volume of information and options can be a bit overwhelming initially. While powerful, it requires some familiarity to harness its full potential efficiently.
DMARCEye is designed with ease of use at its core, something we appreciated during our evaluation. Its interface is clean and intuitive, making it accessible even for those with limited DMARC expertise. The AI-powered insights streamline the process of understanding report data, translating technical jargon into clear recommendations. This lowers the barrier to entry for DMARC adoption.
The onboarding process is smooth, guiding us through the initial setup steps efficiently. While highly user-friendly, the simplicity means it might offer less granular customization for advanced users who desire a deep dive into every single data point beyond DMARC. We found it strikes a good balance for those who want effective DMARC management without getting lost in excessive detail.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers basic product support across all tiers, which we found adequate for general queries and platform usage. For more complex issues or in-depth assistance, their "In-Depth Premium Support" is available only in the highest "Himalaya" tier. This tiered support approach means that smaller teams might need to rely on self-service documentation for advanced troubleshooting.
While we haven't personally engaged with their premium support, the general documentation and tooltips within the platform are quite helpful. For urgent, business-critical DMARC issues, the absence of 24/7 phone support or dedicated account managers in lower tiers could be a consideration for large enterprises.
DMARCEye provides community support across all plans, with priority support included from their "Scale" tier upwards. For the highest "Enterprise" tier, they offer 24/7 phone support, an SLA guarantee, and a dedicated account manager. This structured approach to support ensures that businesses can scale their support needs alongside their domain count and complexity.
We found the priority support responsive and knowledgeable, addressing our DMARC-specific questions effectively. The availability of 24/7 phone support for enterprise clients is a significant advantage for critical issues, providing peace of mind for larger organizations with extensive email infrastructure. This indicates a strong commitment to customer assistance as clients grow.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is highly suitable for organizations with a comprehensive security strategy that extends beyond just email authentication. Its wide array of security reports and monitoring capabilities make it an excellent choice for enterprises looking to consolidate various security policies under one roof. We see it as a powerful tool for security teams managing multiple facets of their digital presence.
For MSPs, its robust multi-tenancy features (Team Access and OpenID Connect in higher tiers) make it viable for managing multiple client domains efficiently. SMBs might find the "Sand" or "Pebble" tiers sufficient for basic DMARC monitoring, but the full breadth of features shines most brightly for larger, more security-conscious organizations.
DMARCEye is an excellent fit for businesses primarily focused on robust DMARC implementation and compliance, especially those who appreciate AI-driven insights to simplify the process. Its user-friendly interface makes it particularly appealing for SMBs and organizations with limited dedicated email security personnel who need clear, actionable guidance.
For MSPs, the "Scale" and "Enterprise" tiers offer multi-account and user management capabilities, allowing for efficient client DMARC monitoring. Enterprises managing a large number of domains will benefit from the "Enterprise" plan's scalability, advanced support options, and custom limits, ensuring their DMARC posture is continuously optimized without overwhelming internal resources.

How does URIports compare with DMARCEye?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

URIports offers extensive features but can be complex for new users, and its most advanced support is reserved for top tiers. DMARCEye, while user-friendly and AI-enhanced, is more singularly focused on DMARC and has less comprehensive domain security features beyond that scope. We've noticed that DMARCEye's lowest tier has no email notifications, which can be a drawback.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
A seamless DMARC monitoring experience
What do you like best about DmarcEye? Ease of Use: DMARCeye is engineered with the end-user in mind, making it an ideal choice for those who are not necessarily tech-savvy. What do you dislike about DmarcEye? Sometimes it might be hard to understand DMARC errors, but I guess this is more of a DMARC problem itself. What problems is DmarcEye solving and how is that benefiting you? DMARCeye makes it easy to monitor and understand DMARC reports.
Jan P.
Programmer Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

Pricing

URIports offers a more granular tiered pricing structure starting very low for personal use, while DMARCEye has a simpler domain-based model that offers significant discounts for annual billing.
Logo
Logo
Small
Sand tier: $1/month (10k reports, 3 domains)
Basic tier: $7.50/month (1 domain, unlimited emails)
Medium
Pebble/Pebble Plus tiers: $6-$11/month (100k reports, 5 domains)
Scale tier: $6/domain/month (2-50 domains, unlimited emails)
Large
Stone tier: $28/month (500k reports, 25 domains), custom for more
Scale tier: $6/domain/month (2-50 domains, unlimited emails)
Enterprise
Mountain/Himalaya: $110-$440/month (2.5M-10M reports, 100-400 domains)
Enterprise tier: From $300/month (50+ domains, custom limits)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or DMARCEye?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions