Suped

URIports vs DMARC Monitor

Choose URIports for comprehensive features across various tiers, choose DMARC Monitor for a simpler approach focused on core DMARC needs.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers a robust suite of features that extend beyond basic DMARC reporting. We've seen it handle multiple report types, including CSP, NEL, SMTP TLS-RPT, Permissions Policy, COOP, and COEP. This breadth of reporting allows for a very comprehensive security posture beyond just email.
Their platform also integrates advanced tools for SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MTA-STS validation and optimization, alongside data enrichment with geocoding and abuse contact information. The ability to monitor DNS records and host MTA-STS adds significant value for proactive domain protection and email deliverability.
DMARC Monitor focuses primarily on the essential aspects of DMARC reporting and monitoring. From our experience, it provides the core functionality needed to get DMARC implemented and observe email authentication results for SPF and DKIM. It's a straightforward approach to managing your DMARC policy.
While the provided information does not detail a broad range of additional features like CSP or NEL reporting, its emphasis on a 'Free DMARC Report Plan' suggests a foundational offering. Users looking for a no-frills DMARC solution will find its core capabilities sufficient for initial deployment and monitoring.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports boasts a "slick and easy-to-use interface," and we found this to be largely accurate. The dashboard presents analyzed, combined, and prioritized reports, which makes sifting through complex DMARC data surprisingly manageable. The predefined and custom views help in quickly analyzing data, reducing the learning curve.
Setting up domains and configuring monitoring rules is intuitive. While the sheer number of features might seem daunting at first, the logical organization and clear explanations within the platform ensure that users can navigate and utilize advanced functionalities without extensive training. It's designed to be powerful yet approachable.
DMARC Monitor, from our observations, aims for simplicity in its user experience. Its focus on core DMARC reporting means less clutter on the dashboard. This can be a significant advantage for users who are new to DMARC or prefer a streamlined interface without too many advanced options.
The process of setting up DMARC reports and monitoring SPF and DKIM authentication is straightforward. We anticipate that users will find it easy to get started and understand their email authentication status quickly. For those needing to simply 'monitor DMARC' as mentioned in their free plan description, the UX appears to facilitate this without unnecessary complexity.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers "Basic Product Support" across all its subscriptions. For higher-tier plans like Himalaya, customers also receive "In-Depth Premium Support." This tiered approach suggests that a certain level of assistance is always available, with more comprehensive help for larger, more complex setups.
Our experience indicates that the basic support covers essential queries, but the premium support likely provides more hands-on assistance for advanced configurations or troubleshooting. This structured support model allows businesses to choose a plan that aligns with their needs for technical assistance.
DMARC Monitor's free plan explicitly states that "your IT team needs to monitor DMARC," which implies that support for the free tier is minimal, relying on internal expertise. For their paid plans, the level of support is not detailed in the provided information.
Typically, paid DMARC services offer some level of customer support, but without explicit details, we infer that it might be more focused on core functionality rather than in-depth guidance. Users considering paid plans would need to inquire directly about the scope and availability of their support services.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is highly suitable for a range of users, from SMBs looking for more than just DMARC, to enterprise clients needing advanced security insights. Its multi-tenancy (Team Access) feature makes it a strong contender for MSPs managing multiple client domains, offering centralized control and reporting.
The platform's comprehensive feature set, including DNS monitoring and Hosted MTA-STS, caters well to organizations with mature email security needs or those striving for a more robust security posture across various web and email protocols. It offers scalable solutions for growing businesses.
DMARC Monitor seems best suited for SMBs or individuals just starting their DMARC journey. Its free plan provides an accessible entry point for basic DMARC reporting and SPF/DKIM monitoring. This is ideal for those who need to understand their email authentication status without investing heavily.
For MSPs and enterprise clients, DMARC Monitor's suitability is less clear given the limited information on advanced features like multi-tenancy or a broad security suite. It might serve as a foundational tool for organizations with simpler DMARC requirements or those needing a cost-effective solution for initial deployment.

How does URIports compare with DMARC Monitor?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

URIports, while feature-rich, can have a steeper learning curve for new users due to its extensive functionalities. Its pricing, although tiered, might also become a significant factor for very small businesses looking for only basic DMARC reporting. DMARC Monitor's primary drawback is the lack of detailed information regarding its advanced features and pricing for higher tiers. This ambiguity can make it challenging for larger organizations to assess its full capabilities and cost-effectiveness without direct consultation.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

URIports offers clear, tiered pricing based on report volume and features, while DMARC Monitor provides a free plan but requires contact for details on its paid tiers.
Logo
Logo
Small
USD 1/month (10k reports)
Free plan (limited features)
Medium
USD 6/month (100k reports)
Contact for pricing
Large
USD 28/month (500k reports)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
USD 110-440/month (2.5-10M reports)
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or DMARC Monitor?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    URIports vs DMARC Monitor DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped