Suped

URIports vs DMARC Manager

Choose URIports for comprehensive features and detailed reporting, choose DMARC Manager for a simpler approach to DMARC enforcement.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers a robust suite of tools extending beyond basic DMARC monitoring. Their platform provides detailed insights into various reporting types, including CSP, NEL, and TLS-RPT, making it a powerful choice for holistic security monitoring. We found their data enrichment, with geocoding and whois data, particularly useful for identifying suspicious sources.
The platform excels in providing granular control over report analysis, allowing users to configure custom block rules and thresholds to filter out noise. Its advanced DMARC explanation tool is a standout feature, simplifying complex policy decisions and helping us understand the impact of our configurations.
DMARC Manager focuses primarily on DMARC reporting and enforcement, offering a streamlined interface for managing email authentication. While it may not delve into the broader security reporting of URIports, its core DMARC functionalities are solid. We appreciate its clear presentation of aggregate and forensic reports, making it easy to track DMARC compliance.
The emphasis here is on simplicity and efficiency in achieving DMARC enforcement. It provides the necessary tools for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC alignment, helping users move towards a stricter DMARC policy. We found its approach to identifying legitimate and unauthorized senders to be straightforward and effective for standard DMARC implementation.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our experience, URIports presents a slick and easy-to-use interface, which is commendable given the depth of features it offers. The dashboard provides a quick overview, and navigating through various report types and analysis tools feels intuitive. The search and filter capabilities are strong, allowing us to quickly pinpoint specific data points.
However, with great power comes a slightly steeper learning curve. For users new to email security, the sheer volume of data and options could initially be overwhelming. Once accustomed, though, the custom views and configurable thresholds become invaluable for efficient monitoring and management.
DMARC Manager prides itself on simplicity, and we can confirm its user experience is indeed straightforward. The interface is clean, uncluttered, and focuses on essential DMARC data, making it very accessible for users who prefer a less complex dashboard. Getting started and understanding the basic DMARC flow is very quick.
While its simplicity is a strength, it might leave advanced users wanting more customisation or deeper dives into non-DMARC security aspects. The predefined views are helpful, but the options for tailoring the experience to very specific analytical needs are less extensive compared to URIports.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers basic product support across all tiers, with in-depth premium support reserved for their highest 'Himalaya' tier. We found the basic support to be responsive enough for general queries and guidance on using the platform's extensive features. Their documentation is also quite thorough, which helps in self-service troubleshooting.
For those managing critical email infrastructure, the tiered support model means that truly in-depth assistance might require a higher investment. While the platform is generally stable, having access to premium support for complex issues is a consideration for larger organizations or MSPs.
Information on DMARC Manager's support structure isn't prominently displayed on their public pages, suggesting a more standard, perhaps email-based, support channel. We anticipate a level of support suitable for guiding users through DMARC setup and basic troubleshooting, consistent with its streamlined approach.
Without explicit details on different support tiers or response times, it's challenging to compare directly with URIports's offerings. Users considering DMARC Manager for complex environments might want to inquire about their specific support channels and SLAs prior to commitment.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is exceptionally well-suited for enterprises and technically savvy organizations that require comprehensive security monitoring beyond just DMARC. Its multi-tenancy features and team access make it a strong candidate for MSPs looking to manage multiple client domains under one roof. The platform's advanced tools cater to those who need deep analytical capabilities.
While feature-rich, its pricing tiers and extensive functionality might be overkill for very small businesses or individuals only needing basic DMARC compliance. However, for those with evolving security needs or a large number of domains, URIports provides a scalable and powerful solution.
DMARC Manager is ideal for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and organizations that prioritize a clear, focused, and user-friendly DMARC enforcement solution. It's also suitable for businesses just starting their DMARC journey, providing an accessible entry point without overwhelming complexity.
For MSPs, its potential for multi-tenancy or scaled management would need further investigation, as its public information doesn't highlight these aspects as strongly as URIports. Large enterprises with highly complex email ecosystems and a desire for broader security reporting might find DMARC Manager's scope too narrow, preferring a more comprehensive platform.

How does URIports compare with DMARC Manager?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

URIports, while feature-rich, can have a steeper learning curve for new users due to its extensive functionality. Deeper, in-depth support is only available at its highest pricing tiers, which might be a consideration for smaller teams with critical needs. Its pricing structure for larger email volumes or domain counts can also scale up quickly. DMARC Manager's primary drawback is its relative lack of detailed public information on advanced features, multi-tenancy, or specific support levels. While simple, its focus might be too narrow for organizations seeking a broader email security monitoring suite or extensive customisation options.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

URIports offers transparent tiered pricing with a generous free plan, while DMARC Manager emphasizes a free trial and requires direct contact for detailed enterprise-level costs.
Logo
Logo
Small
$1/month (Sand tier, 10k reports)
Contact for pricing
Medium
$6/month (Pebble tier, 100k reports)
Contact for pricing
Large
$110/month (Mountain tier, 2.5M reports)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
$440/month (Himalaya tier, 10M reports)
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or DMARC Manager?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions