Suped

URIports vs Centera DMARC Compliance

Choose URIports for robust features and transparent pricing, or Centera DMARC Compliance for a focused, enterprise-oriented solution.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers a wide array of features extending beyond DMARC, encompassing Content Security Policy (CSP), Network Error Logging (NEL), SMTP TLS-RPT, and more. This provides a comprehensive suite for both web and email security reporting, giving users a broader security overview.
We found their detailed data enrichment, including geocoding, hostname lookup, whois data, and abuse contact information, to be particularly useful for in-depth forensic analysis. The platform also includes SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MTA-STS tools for validation and optimization, along with advanced DMARC explanation features.
Centera DMARC Compliance focuses specifically on DMARC enforcement and reporting, offering core functionalities to help organizations achieve and maintain DMARC compliance. Its toolset is designed to simplify the process of DMARC analysis and policy implementation.
While more specialized in its scope, it provides the essential features needed to monitor DMARC aggregate reports, identify sending sources, detect spoofing attempts, and guide users toward an enforced DMARC policy effectively. The platform aims for a direct path to compliance without extensive additional features.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports presents a slick and intuitive interface that makes navigating complex DMARC reports surprisingly manageable. We appreciate the ability to create predefined and custom views, which allows for quick and efficient data analysis tailored to specific needs, reducing the 'noise' in reports.
The advanced DMARC explanation tool is a standout feature, simplifying the intricacies of DMARC authentication for users of all technical levels. While the breadth of features can initially seem overwhelming, the user interface guides us effectively through the data, from high-level summaries to deep dives.
Centera DMARC Compliance features a straightforward dashboard designed for clarity in DMARC monitoring. We noted its emphasis on presenting critical compliance data upfront, which is beneficial for users primarily focused on quick status checks and understanding their DMARC posture.
The user experience is geared towards efficiency in achieving DMARC enforcement. It streamlines the reporting process, making it easy to see which sources are passing or failing DMARC. This direct approach ensures that users can focus on actionable insights rather than getting lost in excessive data.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports provides basic product support across all tiers, ensuring that fundamental queries are addressed. For more complex issues or proactive assistance, in-depth premium support is available at higher tiers, such as the Himalaya plan. Their documentation is generally comprehensive and accessible.
Our experience suggests that their support team is responsive for general inquiries, helping users navigate the platform and understand their DMARC data. The tiered support structure means that larger organizations or those with more critical needs might benefit significantly from the premium options.
Centera DMARC Compliance offers support channels, but specific details on their support tiers, availability, or expected response times are not publicly detailed. This lack of transparency makes it challenging to evaluate the full scope of their support offerings without direct engagement.
Our understanding is that Centera likely provides a direct engagement model for its customers, possibly tailored for larger organizations. For users who prioritize clear and immediate access to support information, this might require a direct consultation to understand the level of assistance provided.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is highly suitable for SMBs and growing businesses due to its cost-effective and tiered pricing structure that allows for scalability. Its generous Sand tier (free tier) makes it an attractive option for individuals or very small businesses just starting with DMARC. MSPs will appreciate the multi-domain management capabilities provided through Team Access.
While its top tiers offer features for enterprise users, larger and more complex enterprise environments might need to leverage its API for deep integration. The platform's broad feature set beyond DMARC makes it ideal for organizations looking for a unified view of various security policies.
Centera DMARC Compliance appears to be geared more towards enterprise clients due to its focused approach on compliance and the need for direct engagement for pricing and setup. Its specialized tools are beneficial for larger organizations with stringent DMARC enforcement requirements and dedicated security teams.
While it can serve SMBs with complex DMARC needs, the absence of transparent pricing might be a barrier for those seeking quick comparisons or a self-service model. MSPs could find it suitable for managing DMARC for a specific set of enterprise clients, though public details on multi-tenancy are not available.

How does URIports compare with Centera DMARC Compliance?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering URIports, we found that while it offers extensive features, the data retention period is relatively short at lower tiers (30 days). This could be a limitation for organizations that require longer historical data for compliance or forensic analysis. The breadth of features, while powerful, can also create a steeper learning curve for beginners. For Centera DMARC Compliance, the most significant drawback we encountered is the complete lack of public pricing or detailed feature information. This opaqueness makes it challenging for potential users, especially SMBs, to evaluate its suitability without direct engagement and can be a barrier to entry.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

URIports offers transparent, tiered pricing starting very affordably, while Centera DMARC Compliance requires direct contact for all pricing information.
Logo
Logo
Small
USD 1/month (Sand tier)
Contact for pricing
Medium
USD 6/month (Pebble tier)
Contact for pricing
Large
USD 28/month (Stone tier, 500k reports)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
USD 110/month (Mountain tier, 2.5M reports)
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or Centera DMARC Compliance?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions