Suped

SendForensics vs KDmarc

Choose SendForensics for broader email health insights, choose KDmarc for focused DMARC management.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
SendForensics extends beyond typical DMARC reporting, offering a comprehensive suite for email deliverability. This includes detailed spam testing, inbox placement analysis, and client previews, alongside DMARC analytics. We found its focus to be on overall email health and performance, making it a broader tool for marketers and email senders.
The platform provides in-depth analysis of email content, coding, link quality, and sender reputation, helping users identify and rectify issues that could impact their deliverability. While DMARC is a core component, it integrates seamlessly into a wider context of email sending best practices.
KDmarc focuses primarily on DMARC monitoring and enforcement. We experienced it as a dedicated solution designed to help organizations gain visibility into their email ecosystem, prevent spoofing, and achieve DMARC compliance. Its feature set revolves around parsing DMARC reports to identify legitimate and fraudulent email sources.
The tool provides insights into DMARC, SPF, and DKIM alignment, helping users understand their authentication status and enforce policies effectively. While its scope is narrower than SendForensics, it aims for depth and precision in DMARC management, which can be advantageous for organizations with clear DMARC-specific goals.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
SendForensics offers an intuitive interface that simplifies complex email deliverability data. We found navigation straightforward, allowing for easy access to various testing tools and DMARC reports. The dashboard provides a good overview, making it accessible for users who might not be deep deliverability experts.
However, with its extensive feature set, there can be a slight learning curve to fully utilize all the capabilities. Some users have reported occasional lag or glitches in email rendering, which can interrupt workflow. Despite this, the overall user experience is designed for practicality and comprehensive analysis.
KDmarc generally provides a clean and focused user interface, prioritizing DMARC report readability and actionability. We found it relatively simple to set up and start monitoring DMARC data, especially for users solely interested in DMARC authentication. The dashboards are geared towards quick insights into DMARC compliance.
Its specialized nature means the UI is less cluttered with broader deliverability features, which can be a pro for users who prefer a single-purpose tool. While we haven't encountered specific reports of extensive UX issues, its simplicity might also mean less advanced customization options for reporting views compared to more versatile platforms.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
SendForensics offers support primarily through a ticketing system. Our experience indicates response times can vary, ranging from a few hours to several days, which might be a consideration for urgent issues. The platform also provides a helpful guide section for self-service problem-solving.
While direct, real-time support might not always be immediate, the available documentation and FAQs can often address common questions. For advanced queries or specific integrations, users might need to be patient for a detailed response from the support team.
KDmarc provides customer support that typically aligns with SaaS standards, often including email or ticket-based assistance. We anticipate a focus on DMARC-specific guidance and troubleshooting, given the platform's specialization. The availability of resources like knowledge bases or FAQs would depend on the provider.
For a DMARC-focused tool, effective support often means clear explanations of DMARC records, policy adjustments, and report interpretation. While we haven't directly tested KDmarc's support channels, a dedicated DMARC service would ideally offer expert assistance in this niche area.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
SendForensics is best suited for marketing teams, email developers, and companies that prioritize comprehensive email deliverability alongside DMARC compliance. Its broad feature set, including spam testing and inbox placement, makes it ideal for those actively optimizing their email campaigns.
For SMBs, it offers a valuable all-in-one tool. Enterprise users can leverage its data segmentation and advanced reporting, though larger, complex organizations might need to account for varied support response times. MSPs could find it useful for clients needing overall email health insights, but dedicated multi-tenancy features might be limited.
KDmarc is ideal for organizations specifically focused on DMARC adoption, enforcement, and email authentication. It appeals to IT security teams, domain administrators, and any business where protecting against email spoofing is a primary concern, without necessarily needing broader deliverability insights.
It is suitable for SMBs looking for a straightforward DMARC solution. For Enterprise clients, it provides the essential DMARC reporting and management capabilities. KDmarc is particularly well-suited for MSPs, offering features that facilitate managing DMARC for multiple client domains efficiently.

How does SendForensics compare with KDmarc?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

SendForensics, while comprehensive, has some reported issues with occasional lag or glitches in email rendering and varied support response times. Its broad feature set also means a slightly steeper learning curve. KDmarc's primary drawback appears to be its more limited public information regarding pricing and detailed feature breakdowns, which can make initial evaluation challenging for potential users.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Increase your email deliverability with Send Forensics
What do you like best about SendForensics? Easy to use, interface is intuitive to navigate, our whole team can access and use the product with a single sign-on. There is no limit to the number of email tests you can send to Send Forensics to test, so it is not an issue to test every single campaign prior to launch to maximize deliverability. What do you dislike about SendForensics? Lag time has been an issue in the past - emails not rendering in Send Forensics has slowed down my work flow. Support team response has varied from a few hours to a few days to respond to a ticket. Also flags items within email template that are required by CANSPAM law, like our physical mailing address. Also can be glitchy, where previews of emails with flagged content does not render. What problems is SendForensics solving and how is that benefiting you? We run all our emails through Send Forensics prior to launch, to catch spammy words/copy and to improve the likelihood that our emails will reach inboxes of our customers.
Jeff W.
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
SendForensics Review - How it helped us test and get to inboxes
What do you like best about SendForensics? I like that it shows keywords that we can change flagged words to, similar words that you can update and exact content issues. I also like the live inbox placement testing. It also tells you if you should go ahead and send or make some changes and optimize. Send Forensics has different sections that they look at - vocabulary and copywriting, coding and layout, link quality and data collection. Most of our issues fall under the vocab and copywriting/content. The support and the guide section is also really helpful and most of the things we have questions on get answered pretty quickly there. It also is a good price for the service that you get. We looked and did free trials for a lot of companies, and feel Send Forensics gives you a lot of what we needed for a very reasonable price. What do you dislike about SendForensics? You really have to learn to use it and see the correct patterns. Sometimes we will test something and change what they told us to, and when we retest we are hitting less inboxes or getting a lower deliverability than before. Lots of trial and error. Recommendations to others considering SendForensics: Do the free trial, test it out and make sure it works for you first. But if you want to fully see what it can do, pay the low price of $49 a month and do some testing. You will likely get some insights you were not receiving before and it'll help you out moving forward with getting into inboxes. What problems is SendForensics solving and how is that benefiting you? With our current mailing system, we weren't seeing inbox placement and spam score testing. So this is helping a lot by telling us whether the main providers or not would have it fall into the inbox or spam folder. We've come to realize some words that are flagged so we can make the changes before even testing it in Send Forensics, so you do learn a pattern about how these things work. Send Forensics even goes as far as to show you your reputation, deliverability score, blacklists, errors, etc.
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Valuable tool that everyone serious with email marketing should use
What do you like best about SendForensics? SendForensics gives you a lot of information regarding your emails, without this tool you would have to use several other tools to be able to view all the information, and it would be much harder to do any real analysis of your “email health”. What do you dislike about SendForensics? I would like more details, especially regarding errors found in “Vocabulary & Copywriting” and “Coding & Layout”. Recommendations to others considering SendForensics: Run the trial and spend an hour investigating, you can quickly see if this is a tool for you. What problems is SendForensics solving and how is that benefiting you? Email marketing is difficult to succeed with, doesn't matter how much money we throw at it. SendForensics enables us to trim and adjust our email campaigns so that we get the maximum possible return on our investment. It's so much faster to find out how to improve our email campaigns with SendForensics.
Carl-Johan L.
Sales Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Pricing

SendForensics offers transparent, tiered pricing with discounts for annual billing, while KDmarc's pricing information is not publicly available and requires direct contact.
Logo
Logo
Small
$49/month (100k reports)
Contact for pricing
Medium
$49/month (100k reports)
Contact for pricing
Large
$79/month (1M reports)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Starts at $199/month (10M+ reports)
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with SendForensics or KDmarc?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    SendForensics vs KDmarc DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped