Suped

SendForensics vs.
DMARC-SRG in 2026

SendForensics dashboard screenshot
sendforensics.com logo
SendForensics
DMARC-SRG dashboard screenshot
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
vs.
We tested SendForensics and DMARC-SRG for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender connected. SendForensics gave us a managed reporting workflow with clearer commercial boundaries, while DMARC-SRG was useful for hands-on teams that want a free self-hosted parser and accept manual operations.
Published 5 Nov 2025
Updated 4 Jun 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
sendforensics.com logo
SendForensics
Managed DMARC reporting and deliverability testing
Starts at
From $49 / month
Best fit
Marketing-led teams that want DMARC reporting beside deliverability testing
In one line
SendForensics handled our approved senders cleanly, but policy movement still depended on a human operator interpreting the DMARC evidence.
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
Free self-hosted DMARC aggregate report viewer
Starts at
$0 software cost
Best fit
Technical teams that want direct control over parsing and storage
In one line
DMARC-SRG parsed aggregate reports reliably after setup, but classification, alerting, and enforcement planning stayed mostly manual.
suped.com logo
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped

Choose SendForensics for managed testing, DMARC-SRG for self-hosted control

Pick SendForensics if
Best for marketing and deliverability teams that also need DMARC reporting
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace became recognizable sources after the first reporting cycles.
SendGrid and Mailchimp sat in the same account as content and inbox placement checks.
The parked domain was easy to monitor for spoof attempts without running our own parser.
From $49 / month
Pick DMARC-SRG if
Best for technical operators who want a free DMARC report store
Mailbox ingestion worked after server, database, and cron setup were finished.
Raw DKIM and SPF details were available for the forwarded SPF failure case.
The unknown sender needed manual naming and owner notes outside the product.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Best when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter more than raw report storage
Guided fixes reduce manual translation after an authentication failure appears.
Automated issue detection helps teams catch new sender drift without reading every report.
MSP workflows and published starter pricing make ownership clearer before rollout.
Free plan available

The differences that actually change your week

sendforensics.com logo
SendForensics
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
suped.com logo
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate XML report parsing, review, and domain-level DMARC visibility.
Managed reporting
Self-hosted parser
Managed reporting
Source detection
Ability to identify sending services and separate approved senders from unknown traffic.
Partial manual workflow
Manual workflow
Automated classification
Forward detection
Support for understanding forwarded mail where SPF fails but DKIM still explains legitimacy.
Report drilldown
Raw evidence only
Guided explanation
Spoof detection
Ability to expose unauthorized use of a protected domain.
Visible in reports
Visible in reports
Visible with alerts
Notifications and alerts
Operational alerts for meaningful authentication changes and new risks.
Available, tuning needed
Not built in
Noise-controlled alerts
Reporting
Recurring reports, exports, and summaries suitable for stakeholders.
Advanced reporting on higher tiers
Summary reports
Recurring reports
API
Programmatic access for external workflows or internal reporting.
Not published
Not published
Available
Multi-tenancy
Account separation, client grouping, and clean boundaries between domains or customers.
Agency tier segmentation
Manual separation
MSP workflows
SPF flattening
Managed SPF optimization to avoid DNS lookup-limit problems.
Not tested
Not built in
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Hosted record management for DMARC policy changes.
Reporting only
Reporting only
Supported
Hosted SPF
Hosted SPF record management and controlled updates.
Not tested
Not built in
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted MTA-STS policy and TLS reporting workflow.
Not listed
Not built in
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist and blacklist visibility plus reputation monitoring signals.
Available in broader platform
Not built in
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Detection of new authentication failures, unauthorized senders, and authentication drift.
Partial
Manual workflow
Supported
AI copilot
Assistant-style guidance for interpreting DMARC evidence and next actions.
Not listed
Not built in
Supported
DNS monitoring
Monitoring for DNS record changes that affect authentication.
Not listed
Not built in
Supported
Self hostable
Ability to run the product on infrastructure controlled by the user.
SaaS
Self hostable
Not self hostable
Free trial/free tier
Free entry path for evaluation or low-volume monitoring.
No free plan listed
$0 self-hosted
Free plan available

Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10

We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric covering enforcement, support, source resolution, onboarding, MSP workflows, alerting, hosted records, blocklist and blacklist monitoring, pricing clarity, and time to enforcement. Higher is better in every row.

SendForensics scored higher for managed operations, while DMARC-SRG scored higher for self-hosted control.

SendForensics gave us a clearer path through Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender because the platform already had managed reporting patterns and commercial account structure. DMARC-SRG gave us direct access to parsed report evidence, but the unknown sender, forwarded SPF failure, alerting, and policy readiness all required outside notes or manual process.
SendForensics score
59/100
DMARC-SRG score
23.5/100
sendforensics.com logo
SendForensics
59/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
6.0
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
6.5
Alerting and integrations
5.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
6.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
6.5
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
23.5/100
DMARC enforcement
3.5
Customer support
1.5
Source resolution
3.5
Setup and onboarding
3.0
MSP workflows
2.0
Alerting and integrations
0.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
3.0

Feature set

Managed breadth vs parser control

SendForensics has the broader managed feature set. DMARC-SRG has the leaner reporting core.

SendForensics covered more of the week-to-week DMARC reporting workflow, especially when we compared approved senders, spoof evidence, and stakeholder reporting. DMARC-SRG was useful when we wanted a free report viewer, but buyers should decide whether they need guided fixes and automated issue detection before choosing a self-hosted parser.
sendforensics.com logo
SendForensics
SendForensics screenshot
Microsoft 365 grouped clearly
SendGrid drilldowns were usable
Mismatch case surfaced quickly
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC-SRG screenshot
Raw SPF detail visible
DKIM subdomain case clear
Mailchimp needed manual naming
SendForensics grouped Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic quickly enough for us to separate normal corporate mail from marketing mail, then gave us workable drilldowns for SendGrid and Mailchimp. The SPF pass with visible from mismatch was easy to spot, and the parked-domain spoof sample surfaced as a problem worth investigating, but the product still required us to write the final owner action for the unknown sender.
DMARC-SRG gave us the raw aggregate evidence we needed to inspect DKIM and SPF outcomes, including DKIM pass on a subdomain and forwarded mail with SPF failure. It did not turn Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, or the support desk sender into an ownership workflow by itself, so classification and next steps lived in our notes.

User experience

Guided account vs technical console

SendForensics was easier to run weekly. DMARC-SRG was easier to reason about technically.

SendForensics reduced setup friction across the three domains and made weekly review more approachable for a non-developer operator. DMARC-SRG gave us direct, plain report access, but the setup path and ongoing interpretation required a technical owner.
sendforensics.com logo
SendForensics
SendForensics screenshot
Three domains added cleanly
Unknown sender stayed visible
Forwarded SPF needed explanation
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC-SRG screenshot
Setup required server work
Raw evidence was clear
No guided sender naming
With SendForensics, adding the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain was straightforward once the DMARC rua records were in place. The unknown sender took a few report cycles to classify confidently, and the forwarded mail SPF failure needed manual explanation, but the interface kept those cases visible in one review flow.
With DMARC-SRG, onboarding started with infrastructure rather than a product wizard: PHP, database, mailbox ingestion, cleanup settings, and access control. Once live, the unknown sender was visible in the reports, and the forwarded SPF failure was explainable through raw authentication results, but there was no guided path for turning that evidence into a policy decision.

Support

Vendor help vs community operation

SendForensics has a clearer support path. DMARC-SRG expects technical ownership.

SendForensics had the more practical handoff model for DNS setup questions and escalation planning, especially once multiple domains and senders were in play. DMARC-SRG had no managed onboarding or commercial support tier in our review, so support expectations need to match self-hosted software.
sendforensics.com logo
SendForensics
SendForensics screenshot
Vendor escalation path exists
DNS handoff still manual
Enterprise scope needs sales
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC-SRG screenshot
No managed onboarding found
Admin owns DNS handoff
Community support expectation
For SendForensics, the support model made sense for a team that wants help validating DNS setup and interpreting the first reporting cycles. We still had to prepare a clean DNS handoff for the parked domain and marketing subdomain, and enterprise onboarding clarity depended on the paid tier, but escalation had an obvious vendor route.
For DMARC-SRG, support was an operational responsibility. We had to own database setup, mailbox ingestion, UI access, backups, and security maintenance, and the DNS handoff was just our own record-change checklist rather than a vendor-guided process.

Suitability

Marketing suite vs operator tool

SendForensics fits teams that value managed reporting. DMARC-SRG fits teams that value self-hosted control.

SendForensics is the better fit when a marketing, security, or IT team wants DMARC reporting beside deliverability checks and recurring stakeholder output. DMARC-SRG is the better fit when a technical operator wants a free parser, but MSP buyers should treat account separation, alert quality, and client handoff as required criteria before committing.
sendforensics.com logo
SendForensics
SendForensics screenshot
Good for marketing teams
Agency segmentation helps MSPs
Handoff notes need work
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC-SRG screenshot
Good for self-hosters
Weak client separation
Manual recurring reporting
SendForensics worked best for the primary corporate domain and marketing subdomain, where recurring reporting and recognizable sender groupings mattered more than raw database control. Agency-tier segmentation helped the MSP-style workflow, but client handoff notes still required work outside the product when we separated approved senders, the support desk, and the parked-domain spoof sample.
DMARC-SRG was a reasonable fit for an SMB or internal operator with a server, database skills, and comfort maintaining ingestion. It was weaker for MSP and enterprise scenarios because account separation, client grouping, recurring reports, and handoff context had to be built around the product rather than inside it.

What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use

sendforensics.com logo
SendForensics

A managed reporting option for teams already thinking about deliverability

SendForensics felt most useful when we reviewed DMARC evidence as part of a wider sender-health routine. Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender were easier to discuss with marketing and IT stakeholders because the reports sat beside deliverability testing context.
After 90 days, the main limitation was not raw visibility. It was the amount of interpretation still needed to move policy confidently, especially for the unknown sender, forwarded SPF failure, and the parked-domain spoof sample.
Where it wins
Clear SaaS onboarding path
Public starter pricing
Deliverability context beside DMARC
Agency segmentation available
Where it lags
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
Policy movement still manual
Free tier not listed
Enterprise extras need sales
Pricing
From $49 / month
Free tier
No free plan listed
Onboarding
SaaS setup
G2 rating
3.8 / 5
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG

A self-hosted parser for technical teams that want control

DMARC-SRG felt useful once the infrastructure was stable. It parsed incoming reports, gave us domain and reporting-organization filters, and let us inspect DKIM and SPF details without hiding the underlying evidence.
After 90 days, the operational cost was clear. We had to maintain ingestion, storage, access control, sender naming, alerting outside the tool, MSP-style separation, and stakeholder summaries ourselves.
Where it wins
Free software license
Self-hosted data control
Raw authentication evidence
No subscription gates
Where it lags
No built-in alerting
No managed onboarding
Manual sender classification
No blocklist or blacklist monitoring
Pricing
$0 software cost
Free tier
Free self-hosted
Onboarding
Manual server setup
G2 rating
0 / 5

Pricing

sendforensics.com logo
SendForensics
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
suped.com logo
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$49 / month
Brand covers 2 sending domains and up to 100,000 DMARC reports per month.
$0
Software is free when self-hosted, with server and admin costs outside the product.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$49 / month
Brand fits this volume if the domain and report limits stay within the listed plan.
$0
No published SaaS volume cap, but capacity depends on hosting, database, and ingestion setup.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$199 / month
Agency covers 15 sending domains and adds segmentation and advanced reporting.
$0
Software cost stays free, while operational limits depend on the deployment environment.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
From $349 / month
Enterprise starts publicly at this price, with custom integrations or SSO affecting final scope.
$0
No paid enterprise tier or commercial SLA was publicly listed.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
SendForensics prices are public monthly list prices. DMARC-SRG software price is public as $0 for self-hosting, while hosting, maintenance, storage, backups, and administrator time are estimated operational costs. Comparison pricing was normalized for the listed segments and checked as of May 15, 2026.

If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped

Suped dashboard
Turn reports into owner actions
SendForensics exposed the unknown sender, but we still had to write the owner action ourselves. Suped's product connects source identification with guided remediation steps.
Avoid self-hosted alert gaps
DMARC-SRG gave us parsed evidence, but no built-in alerting for the spoof sample or new sender drift. Suped's product adds operational alerts around authentication changes.
Reduce MSP handoff work
Both reviewed products needed extra work for client separation and recurring handoff notes. Suped's product has MSP workflows that keep domains, issues, and reports organized by account.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from SendForensics or DMARC-SRG?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.

Frequently asked questions

Here's why customers love Suped for DMARC monitoring

MONEYME cover

How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped

See how MONEYME uses Suped
Jam Cyber cover

How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped

See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
DigiBean cover

How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients

See how DigiBean uses Suped
Alliance Group cover

How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped

See how Alliance Group uses Suped
Maaser cover

How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement

See how Maaser uses Suped
G2 LeaderG2 Users Most Likely To RecommendG2 Easiest To Do Business WithG2 High PerformerG2 Best Estimated ROI
DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard
What you'll get with Suped
Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing