Suped

Send-Shield vs KDmarc

Choose Send-Shield for comprehensive features, or KDmarc for a focused approach.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield offers a robust suite of DMARC reporting features, encompassing detailed aggregate and forensic report analysis. Their interface provides a granular view into email authentication results, allowing us to quickly identify DMARC, SPF, and DKIM failures. It is quite effective at pinpointing problematic sending sources, which is crucial for achieving DMARC enforcement.
We've found Send-Shield's approach to include automatic subdomain detection, which helps prevent blind spots in DMARC coverage. The platform also includes proactive threat monitoring, attempting to flag potential spoofing attempts or malicious activity early. This comprehensive view helps us maintain a secure email ecosystem.
KDmarc focuses on providing clear and actionable DMARC insights. While perhaps not as feature-rich as some competitors, it excels in presenting DMARC aggregate report data in an understandable format. We appreciate its ability to differentiate between legitimate and suspicious traffic, which is vital when moving towards a p=quarantine or p=reject DMARC policy.
The platform includes essential features like source identification and detailed authentication results. It provides a solid foundation for DMARC implementation and monitoring without overwhelming users with excessive complexity. For those who need a straightforward DMARC solution, KDmarc hits the mark.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Navigating Send-Shield's dashboard is generally intuitive. The data visualizations are well-designed, making it relatively easy to grasp complex DMARC data. Setting up DMARC records and getting initial reports flowing feels streamlined, with clear instructions guiding us through the process. However, some advanced features can have a slight learning curve.
We've observed that while the core functionality is accessible, optimizing settings or diving deep into forensic reports might require some familiarity with DMARC concepts. The platform feels professional and capable, designed for users who want a high degree of control and insight, even if it means a few extra clicks for specific details.
KDmarc truly shines in its user experience, especially for those new to DMARC. The interface is clean, uncluttered, and focuses on presenting the most critical information upfront. We found the setup process to be remarkably straightforward, allowing us to get DMARC monitoring operational with minimal fuss.
The dashboards are designed for quick understanding, with summary views that provide an 'at-a-glance' overview of our domain's DMARC status. While it might offer fewer customization options than Send-Shield, this simplicity is a significant advantage for users who prioritize ease of use and rapid comprehension over granular control.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield offers varying levels of support based on the plan, ranging from basic email support to dedicated account managers for enterprise clients. We've experienced their email support to be responsive and knowledgeable, addressing our DMARC queries with practical advice. Having access to meeting support in higher tiers is a definite plus for complex configurations.
Their team generally understands the nuances of DMARC and email deliverability. While we've not needed 24/7 support frequently, its availability for enterprise plans indicates a commitment to high-stakes environments. The support structure scales with the business need, which is a sensible approach.
KDmarc provides solid support, particularly given its focus on simplicity. While it might not boast the same breadth of support channels or dedicated managers as Send-Shield's higher tiers, their team is effective in helping users navigate the platform and understand their DMARC reports. We found their responses to be clear and helpful.
For users who might be less technically inclined or new to DMARC, accessible and straightforward support is invaluable, and KDmarc delivers here. They seem to prioritize guiding users through the core DMARC journey effectively, ensuring that even with fewer resources, help is readily available for common issues.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield is highly suitable for organizations that require deep insights into their email authentication and deliverability. It's a strong contender for enterprise-level businesses or larger SMBs that handle significant email volumes and require comprehensive threat monitoring and reporting capabilities. Its feature set supports a proactive security posture.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), Send-Shield offers the tools needed to manage multiple client domains effectively, providing detailed reporting that can be white-labeled or easily integrated into client communications. While capable for MSPs, its multi-tenancy capabilities might need to be explicitly discussed with their sales team for specific needs.
KDmarc is an excellent choice for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) and organizations that are just beginning their DMARC journey. Its user-friendly interface and focus on core DMARC functionalities make it accessible for teams without dedicated email security experts. It helps achieve DMARC compliance without unnecessary complexity.
While KDmarc might not be explicitly marketed towards MSPs, its ease of use could appeal to smaller MSPs managing a limited number of clients who prioritize simplicity and clear DMARC reporting. For large enterprises requiring extensive customization, forensic analysis, or advanced integrations, KDmarc might feel somewhat basic, but it serves its target audience very well.

How does Send-Shield compare with KDmarc?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Send-Shield, while comprehensive, can present a steeper learning curve for users less familiar with advanced DMARC concepts. Its detailed features can sometimes lead to an overwhelming amount of information, potentially requiring more time to sift through for key insights. KDmarc, on the other hand, prioritizes simplicity, which means it might lack some of the granular controls or advanced threat intelligence features that larger enterprises or MSPs might desire. Its reporting might not be as customizable or as deep as Send-Shield's offerings.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Send-Shield offers tiered pricing based on email volume and domains, while KDmarc's pricing information is not publicly available and requires direct contact.
Logo
Logo
Small
£19.99 / month
Contact for pricing
Medium
£49.99 / month
Contact for pricing
Large
£299.00 / month
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
From £699.00 / month
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Send-Shield or KDmarc?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Send-Shield vs KDmarc DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped