Suped

Send-Shield vs ELK DMARC

Choose Send-Shield for a managed DMARC service or ELK DMARC for a self-hosted solution.
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield positions itself as a comprehensive DMARC monitoring and reporting platform. It includes core functionalities like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC checks, along with automated subdomain detection. We found its feature set to be well-rounded for businesses seeking a hands-off approach to email security.
The platform provides various reporting options, moving from basic to analytical and enterprise-level reports depending on the plan. Features such as proactive threat monitoring and advanced threat intelligence are geared towards maintaining a secure email ecosystem without requiring extensive in-house expertise.
ELK DMARC, on the other hand, is an open-source solution that leverages the robust Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana (ELK) stack to process and visualize DMARC reports. Its primary strength lies in its customizable analytical capabilities, offering a powerful toolkit for those familiar with the ELK ecosystem.
While not an out-of-the-box DMARC service, it provides the building blocks for sophisticated analysis and reporting, including source detection, forward detection, and spoof detection through detailed log parsing. Users gain complete control over their data and how it is presented, though this requires significant technical involvement.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield offers a more commercial, polished user interface. We found the setup process to be guided, making it relatively straightforward for users to onboard their domains and begin monitoring DMARC reports. The dashboards are intuitive, presenting data in an easily digestible format with clear visualizations.
This platform aims for a hands-off experience, minimizing the need for deep technical DMARC knowledge. Its design focuses on accessibility, ensuring that even those less familiar with email authentication protocols can effectively manage their DMARC compliance.
ELK DMARC, being a self-hosted, open-source solution, demands a significantly higher level of technical proficiency. The user experience is less about a pre-built interface and more about configuring and navigating Kibana dashboards. This requires familiarity with the ELK stack and Docker environments.
While it offers unparalleled customization, the initial setup and ongoing management can be challenging for those without strong sysadmin skills. It's a powerful tool if you enjoy tinkering under the hood, but it's not for the faint of heart or those seeking a simple point-and-click solution.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield provides structured support tiers, ranging from basic email assistance to premium 24/7 support. Higher-tier plans include access to dedicated account managers, offering personalized guidance and troubleshooting. This ensures that users have direct access to expertise when navigating complex DMARC challenges.
The commercial nature of Send-Shield means that resolving issues and seeking advice is typically a straightforward process through official channels. This level of dedicated support is a significant advantage for organizations that prefer vendor assistance over self-reliance.
ELK DMARC, as an open-source project, relies primarily on community support. Users can seek assistance through GitHub issues, forums, and other public knowledge bases. While the community can be helpful, there's no official vendor support or dedicated team to assist with setup, configuration, or troubleshooting.
This model suits organizations with strong internal IT capabilities or those willing to invest time in self-learning and community engagement. However, it can be a barrier for businesses lacking the in-house expertise to resolve issues independently, as external support often comes at an additional, separate cost.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield is well-suited for a broad range of organizations, from SMBs to enterprises, and particularly Managed Service Providers (MSPs). Its managed service model and user-friendly interface reduce the operational burden, making it ideal for businesses that want reliable DMARC enforcement without the need for extensive in-house email security expertise.
The structured plans and dedicated support cater to companies prioritizing ease of management, proactive monitoring, and guaranteed vendor assistance. For MSPs, its multi-domain management capabilities can streamline client DMARC initiatives.
ELK DMARC targets organizations with robust internal IT teams, particularly those already utilizing or proficient in the ELK stack. It is best for enterprises with specific compliance needs or a strong desire for complete control over their data and infrastructure, as it runs on their own servers.
It is less suitable for SMBs or MSPs looking for an out-of-the-box, fully managed solution, due to its demanding technical requirements and lack of dedicated vendor support. If your team thrives on customization and open-source solutions, ELK DMARC offers powerful analytical potential.

How does Send-Shield compare with ELK DMARC?

Logo
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Send-Shield offers a managed DMARC solution but lacks a perpetual free tier, relying instead on trials. Its data history is limited in lower plans, and there are currently no public G2 reviews to gauge broader user sentiment. ELK DMARC, while free and self-hostable, demands significant technical expertise for setup and ongoing maintenance. It incurs infrastructure costs for the required memory (8GB minimum) and offers no official vendor support, relying on community forums.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
ELK DMARC

Pricing

Send-Shield provides a tiered subscription model based on email volume and domains, offering increasing features and support with higher plans, while ELK DMARC is an open-source solution with no direct software cost, but requires users to cover their own hosting infrastructure expenses.
Logo
ELK DMARC
Small
£19.99/month, 1 domain
Self-host, resource cost
Medium
£49.99/month, 2 domains
Self-host, resource cost
Large
£299.00/month, 8 domains
Self-host, resource cost
Enterprise
Starting from £699.00/month, 15 domains
Self-host, resource cost

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Send-Shield or ELK DMARC?
Logo
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions