Suped

Send-Shield vs DMARCAnalyzer

Choose Send-Shield for comprehensive reporting, choose DMARCAnalyzer for enterprise integration.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield offers robust DMARC reporting with a focus on ease of setup and ongoing monitoring. We found its interface provides clear visibility into email authentication results across SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, making it straightforward to identify authentication failures and potential spoofing attempts.
The platform includes automatic subdomain detection, which is crucial for a complete DMARC deployment, and generates analytical reports that help users understand email traffic patterns. While it covers the essentials, some advanced features found in larger enterprise solutions are not explicitly available or highlighted.
DMARCAnalyzer, now part of Mimecast, provides a broad suite of features designed for comprehensive email security and deliverability. Beyond core DMARC reporting, it excels in detailed source detection and forward detection, offering granular insights into email flows and potential vulnerabilities.
Its integration within the Mimecast ecosystem means it often provides a more holistic view of email security, including support for advanced protocols like BIMI and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT. We observed a strong emphasis on enterprise-grade capabilities, which extend to blocklist monitoring and extensive reporting options.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield prides itself on a user-friendly experience, and we found this to be largely true. The setup process for DMARC records is guided, which is a significant advantage for users new to email authentication. The dashboards are intuitive, presenting data in an easily digestible format with clear charts and graphs.
Navigation is straightforward, allowing users to quickly drill down into specific email sources or authentication failures. While effective, the interface may feel less customizable or visually modern compared to some competitors, but its simplicity contributes to its ease of use for everyday DMARC monitoring.
DMARCAnalyzer offers a professional and comprehensive user interface, reflecting its enterprise focus. The platform provides extensive data visualizations and reporting options, which can be configured to suit various stakeholder needs. We appreciated the depth of analysis available, though this can sometimes come with a steeper learning curve.
For experienced email administrators or security professionals, the detailed controls and customizable reports are highly valuable. However, those new to DMARC might find the initial setup and configuration slightly more complex, requiring a greater investment of time to master the platform's full capabilities.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield offers tiered support based on its pricing plans. For smaller businesses, basic email support is provided, while higher tiers include email and meeting support, and even 24/7 support for enterprise clients. We found their documentation to be helpful for self-service.
Our experience suggests that support responses are timely and knowledgeable, particularly for DMARC implementation and troubleshooting common authentication issues. This makes it a reliable choice for organizations that value accessible, direct assistance without unnecessary complexity.
As a Mimecast product, DMARCAnalyzer benefits from Mimecast's extensive support infrastructure. This typically means access to a broad range of resources, including comprehensive knowledge bases, online communities, and various levels of technical support. We would expect enterprise-level support to be robust.
While specific DMARCAnalyzer support details vary with Mimecast subscriptions, users generally report high-quality assistance for complex issues, integrations, and strategic DMARC policy adjustments. This makes it suitable for larger organizations needing integrated security and dedicated technical account management.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield is an excellent fit for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) looking for a straightforward, cost-effective DMARC monitoring solution. Its guided setup and clear reporting make it accessible even for those with limited DMARC experience. For enterprise clients, its higher tiers offer more capabilities, though it might not have the deeply integrated security ecosystem of a larger provider.
While not explicitly designed for MSPs, Send-Shield's ease of use and tiered structure could allow an MSP to manage multiple client domains, particularly for clients needing basic DMARC enforcement. It provides a solid foundation for protecting email against spoofing and phishing attacks without overwhelming features.
DMARCAnalyzer, particularly as part of the Mimecast suite, is highly suitable for enterprise organizations and MSPs that require a robust, integrated email security platform. Its comprehensive features, advanced reporting, and support for complex authentication protocols cater to larger environments with intricate email infrastructures and strict compliance requirements.
For MSPs, its multi-tenancy capabilities and deeper integrations within Mimecast's security stack make it a powerful tool for managing DMARC for numerous clients efficiently. SMBs might find its feature set more extensive than needed, and potentially more costly, but it offers unparalleled depth for organizations prioritizing advanced security and control.

How does Send-Shield compare with DMARCAnalyzer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Send-Shield's main drawback is its relatively narrower feature set compared to more established enterprise solutions, particularly lacking advanced integrations and security protocols like MTA-STS. DMARCAnalyzer, while feature-rich, can be less accessible for DMARC newcomers and its enterprise focus might mean higher costs and a more complex onboarding experience for smaller organizations. Both products also have limited public reviews, making it harder to gauge user satisfaction.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Send-Shield offers transparent, tiered pricing based on email volume, billed annually, while DMARCAnalyzer requires direct contact for a custom quote, reflecting its enterprise-focused sales model.
Logo
Logo
Small
£19.99/month
Contact for pricing
Medium
£49.99/month
Contact for pricing
Large
£299.00/month
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Starting from £699.00/month
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Send-Shield or DMARCAnalyzer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions