Suped

Send-Shield vs DMARC Monitor

Choose Send-Shield for detailed reporting, choose DMARC Monitor for simplicity.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield offers a robust suite of features designed for comprehensive DMARC management. Its platform provides granular insights into email authentication, helping users quickly identify and resolve issues related to SPF, DKIM, and DMARC.
We found the system particularly strong in its automatic subdomain detection, which is crucial for organizations with complex domain infrastructures. The reporting capabilities are detailed, offering both basic and analytical views, depending on the plan, which helps in understanding email traffic patterns and potential threats.
DMARC Monitor focuses on providing straightforward DMARC reporting. While we couldn't delve into the specifics of all its paid plans, the core offering emphasizes monitoring SPF and DKIM authentication alongside DMARC reports.
It appears to streamline the process for users, making it accessible for those who need essential DMARC visibility without overwhelming them with advanced configurations. The mention of a 'DMARC Monitor Express' solution suggests specific tools for particular needs, although details on its functionality are limited.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield's user interface is professional and well-organized, offering a clear dashboard view of DMARC compliance. We found the navigation intuitive, allowing us to easily drill down into specific reports and identify problematic email sources. The setup process is self-guided, with clear instructions for initial DMARC record configuration.
However, the depth of features can sometimes present a steeper learning curve for new users. While beneficial for advanced users, those just starting their DMARC journey might take a little longer to become fully comfortable with all the available data points and settings.
DMARC Monitor seems geared towards a more simplified user experience. Based on the available information, it emphasizes ease of access to DMARC reports and core authentication monitoring. This approach suggests a clean, uncluttered interface that prioritizes essential information.
We anticipate that the setup would be straightforward for getting basic reports up and running, appealing to users who prefer a 'set it and forget it' solution for initial DMARC visibility. The trade-off, however, might be less depth in terms of advanced customization or forensic analysis, depending on the specific plan.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield offers tiered support based on the chosen plan. Basic email support is available for starter plans, scaling up to email and meeting support for core and plus plans. Enterprise customers benefit from premium 24/7 support, which is a significant advantage for large organizations.
This structured support system ensures that users receive assistance appropriate to their needs and complexity. We appreciate the clear outline of support channels, allowing organizations to select a plan that aligns with their internal IT resources and criticality of email operations.
The available information for DMARC Monitor highlights a 'FREE DMARC Report Plan' which explicitly states that 'your IT team needs to monitor DMARC,' implying a self-service approach for this tier. For paid plans, the details on support levels are not explicitly stated in the public information we reviewed.
This suggests that the primary support model might be more self-help or community-driven for the free tier, with dedicated support options likely available for premium subscribers. Organizations considering DMARC Monitor for advanced needs should inquire about specific support channels and response times for their paid plans.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield is highly suitable for enterprise-level organizations and MSPs (managed service providers) that manage multiple domains and require in-depth DMARC reporting and proactive threat monitoring. Its robust feature set, including automatic subdomain detection and advanced threat intelligence, caters to complex needs.
SMBs (small to medium businesses) can also benefit from Send-Shield, particularly with their starter and core plans, offering a scalable solution as their email infrastructure grows. We found it a strong contender for those prioritizing detailed analytics and a structured approach to DMARC implementation.
DMARC Monitor appears well-suited for SMBs looking for a straightforward entry into DMARC monitoring, especially with its free reporting plan. It provides essential visibility without the complexity that might overwhelm smaller teams or those new to email authentication.
For enterprise clients or MSPs with extensive requirements, DMARC Monitor's offerings might need to be evaluated in more detail, as the available information leans towards a more fundamental DMARC solution. We would recommend thorough inquiry into its advanced features and multi-tenancy capabilities for these larger organizations.

How does Send-Shield compare with DMARC Monitor?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Based on our review, Send-Shield's main drawback is its potential complexity for users unfamiliar with deep DMARC analytics, especially on its more advanced tiers. For DMARC Monitor, the primary limitation we observed is the lack of detailed public information regarding advanced features and pricing for its paid plans, making it harder for potential users to fully assess its capabilities beyond basic reporting.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Send-Shield offers tiered pricing with transparent annual costs, while DMARC Monitor provides a free plan and requires contact for details on its paid offerings.
Logo
Logo
Small
£19.99/month (1 domain, 10k messages)
Free DMARC plan available
Medium
£49.99/month (2 domains, 100k messages)
Contact for pricing
Large
£299.00/month (8 domains, 1M messages)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Starting from £699.00/month (15 domains, 5M messages)
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Send-Shield or DMARC Monitor?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions