Suped

Send-Shield vs DMARC 25

Choose Send-Shield for comprehensive features, choose DMARC 25 for simplicity and Japanese market focus.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield offers a robust suite of DMARC reporting and monitoring features. We found its dashboard provides detailed insights into email authentication, helping to swiftly identify and mitigate threats. It moves beyond basic reporting to include proactive threat monitoring and automatic subdomain detection.
Beyond core DMARC, SPF, and DKIM checks, Send-Shield integrates features like SPF flattening and the ability to monitor multiple active domains, even with its starter plans. The platform aims to provide a comprehensive solution for managing email security postures, rather than just DMARC compliance.
DMARC 25, while focused primarily on DMARC report analysis, delivers a clear and concise overview of your email traffic. It excels in making DMARC data understandable, which is beneficial for users who want to implement DMARC without getting bogged down in an overly complex interface. We appreciate its streamlined approach.
The platform ensures that you can effectively monitor DMARC reports, identify sending sources, and detect potential spoofing attempts. While it may not boast the same breadth of advanced features as some competitors, its simplicity ensures that core DMARC functions are easily accessible and actionable.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Navigating Send-Shield is generally intuitive, especially once you become familiar with its layout. The dashboards are well-organized, offering various filtering and sorting options to drill down into specific data points. We found the setup process to be straightforward, aided by their implementation guides.
However, with its extensive feature set, there can be a slight learning curve for new users, particularly those unfamiliar with advanced email security concepts. The sheer volume of information presented can be a lot to process initially, but it rewards perseverance with deep insights.
DMARC 25 shines in its user experience through simplicity. The interface is clean and uncluttered, making it incredibly easy to get started with DMARC monitoring. We believe it's particularly appealing for users who prefer a direct, no-fuss approach to email security. The focus is on clarity and quick access to essential information.
Its straightforward design means less time spent learning the platform and more time understanding your DMARC reports. While it might lack some of the customization options found in more feature-rich tools, its ease of use for fundamental DMARC management is a significant advantage.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield offers tiered support, starting with basic email support for their Starter plan and escalating to email and meeting support for Core and Plus plans. Enterprise clients benefit from premium 24/7 support and a dedicated account manager, which is a significant plus for larger organizations.
Our experience indicates that response times are generally good, and their team is knowledgeable in guiding users through DMARC implementation and troubleshooting. The availability of meeting support in higher tiers allows for more personalized assistance when complex issues arise.
DMARC 25's support primarily operates through phone and web contact forms, with specific reception hours. This approach suggests a more direct, perhaps localized, support model. Given the Japanese contact details, it implies a strong focus on serving that specific market effectively.
While the explicit tiers of support are not detailed, the direct contact methods indicate a personalized approach, though potentially less immediate for users outside their primary operating hours or region. We appreciate the clear communication channels, even if they are regionally specific.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Send-Shield is highly suitable for organizations of all sizes, from SMBs to large enterprises, especially those looking for a comprehensive email security platform that goes beyond basic DMARC reporting. Its multi-tenancy capabilities make it a strong contender for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) who manage DMARC for multiple clients.
Its advanced features, such as proactive threat monitoring and dedicated account management in higher tiers, also cater well to enterprise-level needs where robust security and personalized support are paramount. It's a good fit for those who want to integrate DMARC deeply into their broader security strategy.
DMARC 25 is best suited for SMBs and individuals or organizations primarily operating within the Japanese market, given its localized contact information. Its emphasis on simplicity makes it an excellent choice for those who need straightforward DMARC monitoring without requiring a multitude of advanced features or complex integrations.
For enterprises, or MSPs managing a diverse portfolio of clients globally, DMARC 25 might be less ideal due to a potentially limited feature set for complex environments and its apparent regional focus. It truly excels as a reliable and easy-to-use DMARC solution for its target audience.

How does Send-Shield compare with DMARC 25?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Send-Shield's main drawback is that its comprehensive feature set can be overwhelming for users new to DMARC, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve. DMARC 25, while user-friendly, suffers from a lack of transparent pricing and a seemingly localized support model that might not suit international businesses or those needing advanced features.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Send-Shield offers clear, tiered pricing based on email volume and domains, billed annually, while DMARC 25 operates with a free trial but requires direct contact for all paid plan pricing.
Logo
Logo
Small
£19.99/month (billed annually)
Contact for pricing
Medium
£49.99/month (billed annually)
Contact for pricing
Large
£299.00/month (billed annually)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
From £699/month (billed annually)
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Send-Shield or DMARC 25?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Send-Shield vs DMARC 25 DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped